British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70305458 United States 01/10/2016 08:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8965063 Ireland 01/10/2016 08:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English So does anyone disagree there were Africans in the roman army and they came to garrison at hadriens wall when Rome invaded Briton? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63748998 Because that's the story. Anyone want to call bullshit on that fact? "Eminent historian Sir Roy Strong said: ‘The only Africans who came here were a few with the Romans who came and then left! I find it disturbing that our children should be taught something that is clearly designed to feed into contemporary problems rather than tell our island’s story properly." He's confirming the story. Are you saying it's bullshit? The PC brigade are spinning the arrival of a few African soldiers (who didn't even stay) to make children believe the whole fucking civilization was African! What is it with you autistic liberals? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71202436 United States 01/10/2016 08:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71204100 Serbia 01/10/2016 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English Negros are the natural born rulers of Earth. They are so smart and adaptable. We should all just admit it and bow down to their superiority. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71182606 No such thing as superior. If we do not kill each other for our differences, of course. Maybe it seems radical, but "color of your herd" depends on where you are, it's almost like geomagnetic fields of the Earth "shapes" and "controls" cosmic radiation and affects level of melanin, among other things. It's slow process, happens through generations, but it works, it's obvious. There are more and more experiments that proves this. I'm not saying that Britain is not for it's own people, just think that all of them sometime in the past lived in Africa, too... There was an Ice age man, do you know how many people live in Antarctica? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70926659 Belgium 01/10/2016 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70926659 ?? From the article: ... refers to a Roman legion of North Africans briefly stationed on Hadrian’s Wall in the 3rd Century, before the arrival of Anglo-Saxons. ... But there is no evidence they ever settled there. Sir Roy Strong said: ‘The only Africans who came here were a few with the Romans who came and then left! And nobody wants to teach they settled there. Do you see? Cognitive dissonance. Sorry but that's not the issue here. inhabitant (ɪnˈhæbɪtənt) n 1. a person or animal that is a permanent resident of a particular place or region inˈhabitancy inˈhabitance n The word inhabitant is not used by the Marxist professor who is advocating teaching about an African garrison of the roman army, that was based in briton. Read it carefully and untangle the dissonance. Whose? Mine or the Daily Mail's? I think you're teaching to the choir here. (I must admit I hadn't read the DM article before I wrote my first post - it was based on the OP.) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70926659 Belgium 01/10/2016 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63748998 United Kingdom 01/10/2016 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English So does anyone disagree there were Africans in the roman army and they came to garrison at hadriens wall when Rome invaded Briton? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63748998 Because that's the story. Anyone want to call bullshit on that fact? "Eminent historian Sir Roy Strong said: ‘The only Africans who came here were a few with the Romans who came and then left! I find it disturbing that our children should be taught something that is clearly designed to feed into contemporary problems rather than tell our island’s story properly." He's confirming the story. Are you saying it's bullshit? The PC brigade are spinning the arrival of a few African soldiers (who didn't even stay) to make children believe the whole fucking civilization was African! What is it with you autistic liberals? And what's with you, you elitist shill using the daily mail as an information source? You'll be quoting murdochs illuminuti zionist shit next. We see you for what you are. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63748998 United Kingdom 01/10/2016 08:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63748998 And nobody wants to teach they settled there. Do you see? Cognitive dissonance. Sorry but that's not the issue here. inhabitant (ɪnˈhæbɪtənt) n 1. a person or animal that is a permanent resident of a particular place or region inˈhabitancy inˈhabitance n The word inhabitant is not used by the Marxist professor who is advocating teaching about an African garrison of the roman army, that was based in briton. Read it carefully and untangle the dissonance. Whose? Mine or the Daily Mail's? I think you're teaching to the choir here. (I must admit I hadn't read the DM article before I wrote my first post - it was based on the OP.) I know we agree. That's the thing though,why would the OP want to push the twisted agenda? |
Éireann User ID: 47148959 Ireland 01/10/2016 08:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English What is this shit? Who is allowing or ordering people with a a socio-political agenda to rewrite national history? What happened to evidence-based science? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70926659 In a healthy society this would be sorted out by sending an open letter to the responsible minister, signed by the best scientists and historians in the country. The ensuing public outcry would have the intended effect of undoing the ridiculous falsification of history and the minister getting the sack. Any chances of this happening? All the evidence is there were Africans garrisoned at hadriens wall. No scientist disagrees with this. I think lots of people have caught cognitive dissonance from not reading the article. ?? From the article: ... refers to a Roman legion of North Africans briefly stationed on Hadrian’s Wall in the 3rd Century, before the arrival of Anglo-Saxons. ... But there is no evidence they ever settled there. Sir Roy Strong said: ‘The only Africans who came here were a few with the Romans who came and then left! And nobody wants to teach they settled there. Do you see? Cognitive dissonance. Then who was here before the Africans that Rome came here to conquer? Was it an empty land before the Anglo and Saxon invasions? Nope. Let's not forget the Picts and the Celts. Eireann~ I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63748998 United Kingdom 01/10/2016 08:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63748998 All the evidence is there were Africans garrisoned at hadriens wall. No scientist disagrees with this. I think lots of people have caught cognitive dissonance from not reading the article. ?? From the article: ... refers to a Roman legion of North Africans briefly stationed on Hadrian’s Wall in the 3rd Century, before the arrival of Anglo-Saxons. ... But there is no evidence they ever settled there. Sir Roy Strong said: ‘The only Africans who came here were a few with the Romans who came and then left! And nobody wants to teach they settled there. Do you see? Cognitive dissonance. Then who was here before the Africans that Rome came here to conquer? Was it an empty land before the Anglo and Saxon invasions? Nope. Let's not forget the Picts and the Celts. Of course the ancient briyons were here. Rome didn't come to conquer Africans,Africans were part of the conquering roman army. Some professor wants to teach this fact and OP is twisting in her shill ways. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70229246 United Kingdom 01/10/2016 09:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English Despite Roman, Anglo-Saxon, Norman and Viking invasions, British dna hasn't really altered that much from pre Roman conquest. So much for there being no native Britons, as is usually the lie trumpeted very loudly by the anti-whites. Everybody should mention this when challenged by the claim we are all immigrants and have no more right to our land than someone that arrived in a canoe carrying 60 people last week: [link to www.ancient-origins.net] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8965063 Ireland 01/10/2016 09:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English ... Quoting: Tess. "Eminent historian Sir Roy Strong said: ‘The only Africans who came here were a few with the Romans who came and then left! I find it disturbing that our children should be taught something that is clearly designed to feed into contemporary problems rather than tell our island’s story properly." He's confirming the story. Are you saying it's bullshit? The PC brigade are spinning the arrival of a few African soldiers (who didn't even stay) to make children believe the whole fucking civilization was African! What is it with you autistic liberals? And what's with you, you elitist shill using the daily mail as an information source? You'll be quoting murdochs illuminuti zionist shit next. We see you for what you are. Here we go... "shill" crap. Here's the original book they're referring to: [link to sharenews.com] and here's the actual GCSE syllabus: : “There were Africans in Britain before ... period when the Phoenicians frequented those regions. [PDF]Specification (Accredited) - GCSE History A - J410 (PDF, 3MB) - OCR www.ocr.org.uk › Images › 207163-spec... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63748998 United Kingdom 01/10/2016 09:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English The PC brigade are spinning the arrival of a few African soldiers (who didn't even stay) to make children believe the whole fucking civilization was African! What is it with you autistic liberals? And what's with you, you elitist shill using the daily mail as an information source? You'll be quoting murdochs illuminuti zionist shit next. We see you for what you are. Here we go... "shill" crap. Here's the original book they're referring to: [link to sharenews.com] and here's the actual GCSE syllabus: : “There were Africans in Britain before ... period when the Phoenicians frequented those regions. [PDF]Specification (Accredited) - GCSE History A - J410 (PDF, 3MB) - OCR www.ocr.org.uk › Images › 207163-spec... Nothing to do with the story.nice try shill. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70926659 Belgium 01/10/2016 09:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70926659 Sorry but that's not the issue here. inhabitant (ɪnˈhæbɪtənt) n 1. a person or animal that is a permanent resident of a particular place or region inˈhabitancy inˈhabitance n The word inhabitant is not used by the Marxist professor who is advocating teaching about an African garrison of the roman army, that was based in briton. Read it carefully and untangle the dissonance. Whose? Mine or the Daily Mail's? I think you're teaching to the choir here. (I must admit I hadn't read the DM article before I wrote my first post - it was based on the OP.) I know we agree. That's the thing though,why would the OP want to push the twisted agenda? It's a good question, but here the tangle of tendentious reporting originates with the Daily Mail. Their article is doing the twisting to fit a certain agenda. It is true though that the OP seems intelligent enough to see it exactly for what it is and he/she decides to push it none the less. Does make you think. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69906121 United Kingdom 01/10/2016 09:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Comedian :D User ID: 48699091 United States 01/10/2016 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English GCSE students are to be taught that some of our nation’s earliest inhabitants were Africans who arrived here long before the English. Quoting: Tess. Saint Comedian, Patron Saint of Bringing the Butthurt to Dipshits ‘There are some assholes in the world that just need to be shot.’ - General Mattis, USMC, Secretary of Defense [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] "Subterfuge and social pressure are the wheel and fire of the 21st century" - Some asshole Legal Disclaimer: All comments are intended as humor and/or fiction and not advice, and not to be confused with any event or person, living or dead. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8965063 Ireland 01/10/2016 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English ... Quoting: Tess. The PC brigade are spinning the arrival of a few African soldiers (who didn't even stay) to make children believe the whole fucking civilization was African! What is it with you autistic liberals? And what's with you, you elitist shill using the daily mail as an information source? You'll be quoting murdochs illuminuti zionist shit next. We see you for what you are. Here we go... "shill" crap. Here's the original book they're referring to: [link to sharenews.com] and here's the actual GCSE syllabus: : “There were Africans in Britain before ... period when the Phoenicians frequented those regions. [PDF]Specification (Accredited) - GCSE History A - J410 (PDF, 3MB) - OCR www.ocr.org.uk › Images › 207163-spec... Nothing to do with the story.nice try shill. Yes it fucking is! NEW YEAR RESOLUTION - Never reply to village idiots who keep using the word shill because they haven't got the IQ to make a sensible argument. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66284208 United States 01/10/2016 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
saviour12631 User ID: 50986303 United Kingdom 01/10/2016 09:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63748998 And what's with you, you elitist shill using the daily mail as an information source? You'll be quoting murdochs illuminuti zionist shit next. We see you for what you are. Here we go... "shill" crap. Here's the original book they're referring to: [link to sharenews.com] and here's the actual GCSE syllabus: : “There were Africans in Britain before ... period when the Phoenicians frequented those regions. [PDF]Specification (Accredited) - GCSE History A - J410 (PDF, 3MB) - OCR www.ocr.org.uk › Images › 207163-spec... Nothing to do with the story.nice try shill. Yes it fucking is! NEW YEAR RESOLUTION - Never reply to village idiots who keep using the word shill because they haven't got the IQ to make a sensible argument. Yeh you tell the shill Tess Del Boy: All the things that we've ever got out of life have come from my intelligence and my foresight Rodney: Well, I'm glad somebody's owned up, ....He who dares wins Rodders ...eekerstard also |
Kootenai Kid User ID: 2892325 United States 01/10/2016 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English The first inhabitants of the british isles arrived in the waning years of the glacial period. They were maritime hunters of marine mammals. Asiatic eskimo types that hunted from skin covered kayaks. They wrre small, dark haired and brown skinned. They were genetically similar to the Sami in finland. Laplanders. Siberian eskimos. They existed along edges of ice sheets and continent edges throught the northern hemisphere, east to west and west to east. As ice free lands emerged in the isles some of these moved inland and became the Picts, hunted to extinction by later arriving peoples who would become Celtic Gaelic language people who arrived from eurasia via the mediterranean, Portugal and spain. The marine mammal eskimo types became migrant reindeer peoples were the first inhabitants since last ice age. We don't know who may have been there prior to the last ice age.It didn't take long for later arrivals to hunt and push out these smaller statured migrant hunter and gatherers to extinction. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12178884 United States 01/10/2016 09:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English So does anyone disagree there were Africans in the roman army and they came to garrison at hadriens wall when Rome invaded Briton? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63748998 Because that's the story. Anyone want to call bullshit on that fact? Do you have any idea, any idea at all at how immensely large the continent if Africa is? By that standard does your dim mind have any understanding that everyone from Africa is not a dim witted bubble lipped Negroe? Im not even going to waste my time anymore, pfft. Calm down fruit loop. The story is saying there were Africans in the roman army. Are you calling that bullshit? You're saying Rome never made it to Africa? Look ditmwit you are trying to spin a lie Africans = Negroes, which isn't true today and certainly was far from being true in Rome's African colonies. Negroes spreading around Africa is a recent development. Analogous to scats, rats and dogs tagging along in neolithic times Go fuck a duck, dumbfuk |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71087986 United Kingdom 01/10/2016 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English In the early 1800's the British took some African troops to Ceylon but their offspring died before adulthood. I do not understand why the Africans want all the karma associated with the Old British Empire anyway. It is the utter stupidity I cannot bear. It just shows how low the education of the country has sunk. In the good old days the perpetrators of this nonsense would have had their rubbish crossed out and told to do the work again. Their plan isn't even subtle propaganda. I would like to point out that the African troops may not even be genetic black Africans anyway. Do we know what people lived in these lands before the Muslim invasion? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71209696 United Kingdom 01/10/2016 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71204100 Serbia 01/10/2016 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English Despite Roman, Anglo-Saxon, Norman and Viking invasions, British dna hasn't really altered that much from pre Roman conquest. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70229246 There's many things that causes DNA changes/mutations. Reproducing with similar one makes smallest ones. I'm telling you that external factors, like cosmic radiation (which has different properties in different part of the world due to geomagnetic field) gives some of the crucial changes to DNA. Ask Monsanto how they are doing some DNA changes if you don't believe in external factors. Everybody should mention this when challenged by the claim we are all immigrants and have no more right to our land than someone that arrived in a canoe carrying 60 people last week Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70229246 That's should not be in question at all. Of course that we should have rights to have our own land, because this comes from complex history, the goal is always to have your own freedom in your own land. I'm just asking myself what will be when some time in the future ice age comes to power again (and Milankovic and others proves that it will happen some day). Would you tell your grandchildren to stay where they are? And that's how I think of this: territory was EMPTY, because of cold and objective reasons, and someday somebody comes there. They were all from Africa, science says. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71193298 United Kingdom 01/10/2016 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4301951 United States 01/10/2016 09:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24124419 United States 01/10/2016 09:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39518785 United States 01/10/2016 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
faint User ID: 68695271 United States 01/10/2016 09:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English Let me guess, next they say Issac Newton, Charles Babbage and James Watt were black? God forbid that white British geniuses made the world a better place. Do children even learn about them? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71208641 Black people are already starting to claim Mozart and George washington as black. What a joke. Seriously? As in the "one drop" test or fully black men? Formerly faint |
Éireann User ID: 47148959 Ireland 01/10/2016 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: British pupils to be taught that the nation's earliest inhabitants were Africans who were in Britain before the English ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63748998 And what's with you, you elitist shill using the daily mail as an information source? You'll be quoting murdochs illuminuti zionist shit next. We see you for what you are. Here we go... "shill" crap. Here's the original book they're referring to: [link to sharenews.com] and here's the actual GCSE syllabus: : “There were Africans in Britain before ... period when the Phoenicians frequented those regions. [PDF]Specification (Accredited) - GCSE History A - J410 (PDF, 3MB) - OCR www.ocr.org.uk › Images › 207163-spec... Nothing to do with the story.nice try shill. Yes it fucking is! NEW YEAR RESOLUTION - Never reply to village idiots who keep using the word shill because they haven't got the IQ to make a sensible argument. They just don't want to see how it is connected. They read the narrative of the news article and base their conclusions on the spoon fed "facts". They don't want to know HOW the establishment is going to wiggle in the bullshit, or how long ago it started, or by whom it was started by. They just look at the news article and think, "Well that doesn't sound too unreasonable." without considering the underlying sources, people and agendas in play for which these changes are required in school curriculum. And to amend my earlier post about Picts and Celts. Dumb me forgot about the native Britons! My deepest apologies, England! Eireann~ I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20 |