GLP ON THE BALL AGAIN

link

Re: Statins regarding Cholesterol.

Screw Cholesterol.

Worse is the Bleached White flour ground and pulverized to such small particles that it causes

Athersclerosis:

Clogged arteries etc.

Non-Bleached, Stone ground flour is BEST.

Read up folks.

Best oils to use:

Cocoanut oil
Olive oil
butter

If it comes in a clear, unshaded bottle - it's NO Good - the good properties of the oil have been processed out.

Cooking at high temps Destroys the Good properties of oils and are then
NO GOOD FOR YOU

Daniel

THANKYOU DANIEL. ONLY MORONS NEED A LINK TO RENSE.

A CLASSIC CASE OF THE USELESS EATER TROLLS RUNNING AROUND HEADLESS AND CLUELESS AGAIN.

MY THEIR MASTER MUST BE PISSED.

GL

More like a classic case of a thread without any information to classify its existence.

I THINK YOU WILL LIKE THIS DANIEL. IT NOT ONLY RIPS STATINS BUT THE FAKE PEER REVIEW PROCESS AS WEEL. BEST OF ALL ITS IN THEIR OWN PUBLISHED WORKS.

QUOTE IN PART

A BOMBSHELL DROPS ON CHOLESTEROL MEDICATION'S GLASS HOUSE





By Byron J. Richards, CCN

November 19, 2006

NewsWithViews.com

It had to happen sooner or later. On October 3, 2006, after extensive review of all studies relating to cholesterol-lowering benefits by statin drugs, scientists reporting in the Annals of Internal Medicine pulled the rug out from under the current government-sanctioned cholesterol levels for reducing cardiovascular disease. Their conclusion, “current clinical evidence does not demonstrate that titrating lipid therapy to achieve proposed low LDL cholesterol levels is beneficial or safe.”

This is not a trivial issue. Many billions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted on the cholesterol drug scam. The health and well being of millions of Americans may have been compromised by reckless lowering of cholesterol, a substance that is vital to health and energy production.

It has long been recognized that adults who have naturally lower cholesterol levels during their 40s and 50s have less heart disease as they grow older. A large body of science supports the notion that LDL cholesterol levels lower than 130 mg/dL is an excellent goal for one and all. How a person should arrive at this goal is a matter of considerable debate. A good diet and exercise is the foundation for any person’s health program and for many this approach is adequate.

The use of nutritional supplements to help lower cholesterol, products that have virtually no side effects and may be highly effective, is considered by the FDA to be an illegal health claim. Instead, the FDA expects Americans to use statin drugs to accomplish this goal, even though the medications have a general anti-energy effect and long list of potentially serious side effects that are not clearly explained to those taking the medications or even to the doctors giving them out.

To make matters worse, several years ago the government-funded National Cholesterol Education Program promoted new guidelines for the use of these drugs. It was recommended that individuals at high cardiovascular disease risk attain LDL levels < 100 mg/dL and individuals at very high cardiovascular risk attain LDL levels < 70 mg/dL. These are abnormally low levels of cholesterol, meaning drugs must be used to create an artificially low level of LDL cholesterol, an unnatural physiological condition. This is very difficult to do and requires high doses of statins, doubling or tripling the dose, oftentimes combined in dangerous combinations with other drugs (like fibrates).


UNQUOTE

PHEW,

EDIT

SEEMS EDGAR CANT READ OR LOOK UP RENSE EITHER.


GL

PART 2

QUOTE

These therapies are extremely expensive and often do not work. These guidelines immediately boosted the sales of statins from fifteen billion per year when the report was released in 2004 to over twenty-two billion in 2005. And now we come to find out there is not a shred of scientific evidence to support that lowering cholesterol in this manner will reduce cardiovascular disease, compared to simply having an LDL lower than 130.

Statins are also being pushed for prevention of a first heart attack in people with only moderate cardiovascular risk. A careful analysis of the statistical data shows that such statin use may very slightly reduce cardiovascular death in this preventive population over a ten year period. However, the drugs kill 1% as a side effect, due to accidents, suicide, and infection, completely canceling out any benefit. This means there is no value at all, from a societal point of view, in wasting billions of dollars of taxpayer money on this pointless preventive strategy.

The amount of money spent on this fraudulent scheme is at least seven billion dollars a year, money that is in essence stolen from hard working Americans. Class-action lawsuits have already been filed against Pfizer for illegal Lipitor promotion, many are sure to follow.

Big Pharma Concocts an Authentic Appearance

The National Cholesterol Education Program is part of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), meaning that it is part of our federal government and has an operating budget of about one million dollars per year. In 2004 it selected a panel of nine “experts” to review statin drug use and make recommendations as to guidelines doctors should follow to reduce cardiovascular disease.

On July 13, 2004, these nine experts published their findings in Circulation, a journal of the American Heart Association. Their paper lists the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association as coauthors – meaning these various groups supported the findings. It doesn’t appear to be very difficult to get published in your own marketing magazine.

Circulation failed to disclose that six of the nine authors had direct financial ties to the makers of statin drugs. Those drugs include Pfizer's Lipitor; Bristol-Myers Squibb's Pravachol, Merck's Lovastatin, and AstraZeneca's Crestor. For example, Newsday.com reported on July 14, 2004, “Dr. H. Bryan Brewer, a physician-scientist at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, was one of the guidelines' authors. He was the subject of a letter to the director of the National Institutes of Health last week from a consumer watchdog, Public Citizen's Health Research Group. The advocacy organization charged that Brewer had failed to disclose his ties to AstraZeneca. Brewer, according to the letter, had written a glowing report in a medical journal about Crestor without disclosing that he is a paid consultant and had presided over a company-sponsored symposium.”

Even though these connections were slightly exposed in the media at the time, no action was taken to review the credibility of the statin science by other less biased researchers. Instead, the public relations buzz was that the statin “science” was solid.

The October 3 review in the Annals of Internal Medicine tears this “solid science” to shreds, something that should have been done two years ago. The review explains the deceitful manipulation of statistics and how not one study proves that lowering LDL cholesterol to the super low levels recommended has any benefit in reducing cardiovascular disease. Simply put, this report is shocking.

The bottom line: there is no credible science, and there never was, that offered proof that lowering cholesterol levels to physiologically abnormal levels reduced cardiovascular risk. Thus, basing a broad governmental public health recommendation on no solid science is flat out wrong. Why aren’t these faulty recommendations being reversed?

UNQUOTE

GL

YAY !
Grey's a Mod Grey's a Mod ! YAY !!!



Now start a thread about Jamie's school dinners again !

and pin it !

"Stay away from the doctors, lawyers, and bankers, and you'll be all right."

Quote from my great grandfather over 100 years ago...advice given to my father.

Just remember, "Don't do drugs."

To which I would add, "drink at home"

THESE THINGS ARE SELF FULLFILLING PROPHECY. OH DEAR YOU HAVE HIGH CHOLESTEROL. TAKE THESE.

OH DEAR HE DIED, HEART ATTACK DID NOT GIVE HIM THE PILLS SOON ENOUGH.

GL

POSSIBLY, WHY GLP IS NOT LIKED, WE KEEP POSTING STUFF LIKE THIS.

WHAT EVER YOU DO DONT QUESTION THE STATUS QUO AND ITS MONEY MAKING MACHINE SCAMS.

GL

as a person who is for the development of drugs and supports synthetic drugs, i agree with the OP. its long known that statins are shit

Hey GL,

You might change the title of this thread to make it more accurate:

Cholestrol of 130 is OK ~~ Statins are KILLING you!!!

Just a suggestion.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Above thread can Save Your LIFE.

Cayenne Pepper can stop the damage from Strokes.

Cayenne Pepper by 6 months can SAFELY Ream out those arteries and blockages.

Cayenne Pepper = Truly AMAZING !!!

Daniel

I do not like food that is already half digested before I eat it.

Too much heavily processed food is very bad.

How much is good? I could eat more than I do now, but I'd hate to have to eat a pound a day, I'd rather go with the stroke, LOL.

Yeah, sadly my mom's on one of those toxins, and sis and I think it's starting to show -re: cognitive skills.


Hey GL - Are you 'Optically Inclined' ? It just strikes me as a bit of a strange handle... Are you a glass-pusher or maybe a ray bender ?? If so you DO know what 'grey' means, right ?

DOC EE SMITH

GL

SHR

A POUND A DAY, LORDY NO

I THINK JUST A TEASPOON A DAY OF HIGHEST HEAT UNIT YOU CAN GET. NEED TO CHECK

GL

SORRY IT TOOK SO LONG

CAYENNE, ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW

[link to www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com]

HOT STUFF, GROW MY OWN.

GL