NASA caught using Green Screen to fake ISS footage

I don't believe much from NASA but the ISS is real and experiments on human DNA etc in space.

busted

They kept mentioning in the video that the "guitar man" astronot was going home. Who picks him up, and how do they pick him at the fake ISS to take him home??

Great catch!

It doesn't matter what you believe.

This is unreal....crazy. Great find!

wait a minute... something seems to be going on. I noticed something:

This particular thread and:

link: Thread: Show me one (1) photograph of earth from space

I think some posts seemed to be either deleted or remodified/reedited then reinserted, etc.

Maybe not... idk. Im likely wrong, maybe just my imaginations or something like that.

Can anyone answer why Peakes face looks so strained like he is squeezing out a huge turd. I would have thought if you are weightless you would not be straining as if you were hanging upside down.

Found this vid on Independant website where he does a 360 degree backflip, the end where he lands it looks crap.

[link to www.independent.co.uk]

Another video on YouTube showing super red faced Peake very strained indeed. Watch first few seconds to see his face, beetroot!

[link to m.youtube.com (secure)]

A chessboard chroma key???

That's the most unspeakably stupid video I've ever watched.

Unless it's another FEs deliberate job to make conspiracy theorists look retard.

That's the reason why ****THEY***** are astronauts and you are NOT.

Some people have balls to live a life of hazardous situations in space, while others have the balls to stay 24/7 in a controlled opposition forum saying they are in front of a chroma key.

That's not a green screen. Pretty sure he was filming that as an educational segment for school kids regarding Newton's 1st law of motion:
[link to principia.org.uk (secure)]
[link to nationalspaceacademy.org]
You can see a picture of the green ball he's swinging on a string here:
[link to nationalspaceacademy.org]
The grid is no doubt intended to be used to measure the velocity of the ball and demonstrate the conservation of momentum.

For reference here is the original NASA TV video with George Bush Sr. and Tim Peake in the background, apparently in the Columbus module doing his filming for the Principia educational outreach event.
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

I was at a conference yesterday with a lot of scientists working behind the scenes sending experiments to and from ISS. The deep, dark, dirty secret is NOT that "space is fake" or other bullshit. Actually what they are quite concerned about are genetic mutations occurring in microorganisms carried by the astronauts. Microbes grow better in microgravity and the immune system is impaired in microgravity, a double whammy. Combined with long duration flights on the ISS and a higher radiation environment and you have a recipe for novel mutations not seen before where microbes have a chance to improve their adaptations to our defenses, even our antibiotics (experiments are underway to test the dosing and efficacy of antibiotics in orbit). There was a very real sense of concern with some of the scientists that new mutations in this environment could create a deadlier bug brought back by astronauts accidentally.

Damn Doc! You giving a doom scenario now.

A) I wasn't the one who deleted your bullshit posts calling me out, insulting me, and calling me a shill.
B) Calling any mod a shill and insulting them is a really good way to get your ass banned.

Now, fuck off.

Why wouldn't they just put him in a fake fucking spaceship?

They would need to have one anyways to get the footage to fill in the green screen.

Or maybe they just like doing things the hard way?

I've some questions based on some simple experiments I did on some NASA pictures.

Why is it that when over-expoursing/over-hue-saturating certain of NASA pictures of moon landing and other in outer space, I'd get pink/cyan/purple and / or just plainly addition of whiteness in/on the outer space area?

I mean, I bucket-painted an empty image (filled with pitch black) and over-expoursed/over-hue-saturated it.. the result: no change state of colour or addition of whiteness as expected. Yet some NASA pictures have cyan-pinkness-purple or addition of whiteness in/on the outer space area when over-expoursed?

Is it because the camera(s) which the astronauts used; captured the spectrum of light information from sun shining through everywhere or something like that?

The outer space itself is void in some sense, and doesn't have any colour of sort.. right? It is only the light from the sun which the cameras captured, something like that?

its all fake---
all of it
there is evidence everywhere

Ok im confused, so its a momentum experiment and that grid screen thing is for measuring it even though there is no number references and the ball is on a piece of string effecting its momentum by human interaction, because?

Also on further examination the screen after a pan back with Peake has been removed/changed the only one i might add and the center screen has two astronauts? waiting to talk to Bush, but then the zoom to camera is with a different set of people, note the colour of the t-shirts. WTF?

I love how this post encapsulates several of the things that the paranoid troglodytes of GLP are afraid of.

Stop being afraid of everything and just live your life. You will most likely die of old age just like billions of other people.

There are no conspiracies.

Bump for later viewing

This is interesting:

link: [link to history.nasa.gov]

Try to over-expourse the picture above to max setting in ps or other img editing program.

What I got was: the Earth got overexpoursed along with variety of colours surrounding it in almost a perfectly square or rectangle way. And over-expoursed stars in the outer space, but no addition or change of white/colours in outer space. This is inconsistance and in contrast with other over-expoursed pictures I did and what I said previously:



Why?

What about this one? link: [link to history.nasa.gov]

When set to over-expoursed to max, addition of enormous whiteness light everywhere even the shadow area. This vastly contrasts with the picture and comment I said above.

What is the fuck going on?

You think "bucket painting" in a program is the same as actually taking pictures? Tell me, do you get any unusual colors when you "over-exposure" my photos?

When over-expoursing those pictures you provided, I got bright and variety of bright colours all over. Makes sense. Indeed from the light information.

But check out my last recently posted message. A contradiction of sort. I can't seem to figure it out.

You seem to be missing the point. You seem to think that some great information can be obtained by fucking up the contrast on a compressed picture which was scanned from an original film picture. It can't. Here's another scan of the same photo:
[link to spaceflight.nasa.gov]
And another:
[link to images.ksc.nasa.gov]
And another:
[link to www.flickr.com (secure)]
All different, all will yield a different result from "over-exposure" (aka, adjusting the histogram). What does that tell you? Your method of research is flawed.

Last Edited by Astromut on 03/02/2016 12:40 PM

A gridded background can not be used for chroma key. one color is selected and not 2. If it was chroma keyed, then the video would show up with either big blocks or lines depending on the color that is selected to be keyed in. I work in television for over 30 years now and know for a fact that it is not keyed in.

NASA is at it,stay back from all there footage and pictures,best of all they pay some to take false footage at ISS and pass it on to those who will watch there fake ufo videos

Flawed, eh? No problem at all. I acknowledge that now.. but another question:

Am I correct in assuming that all pictures on this [link to history.nasa.gov] or from NASA were edited (for compression, resolution size, file size, etc) to make viewing experience easier on the internet?