Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,747 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,994,286
Pageviews Today: 2,689,655Threads Today: 494Posts Today: 10,476
06:27 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....

 
Steve Martin (GW)
10/14/2004 08:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
The top floors (above impact) were breaking away at a sharp angle as they began to topple.

I have a set of still photos showing clearly a drastic increase in the angular momentum of this block of floors as it breaks off from the rest of the tower. In the first still, it shows a 15 degree deviation from true vertical. This increases dramatically to 21.5 degrees in the last still.

Would one of you goverment shills like to tell me what prevented those floors from breaking off from the rest of the building, falling alone into the plaza, and leaving the rest of the tower standing?

WHAT CAUSED THAT!?!?!?

(This should be interesting.)
Steve Martin (GW)
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
No rebuttal at all? I´m stunned....

This is the key to proving intentional demolition and to blowing the lid off the whole government 9/11 cover story.
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
When I was watching the actual event, I said the top of the building is gonna slide off and fall into the street. And guess what... nope, didn´t happen. It was a no brainer if you watched the footage. Top of building should have slide right off.
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
KA-BOOOOM!!!
Blackclaw
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Well that´s when we used our secret gravity beam to move the debris. Cause you know, we might be willing to kill thousands of people but we didn´t want to cause any extra damage.
Undead
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
You´re preaching to the chior boss.

Did you see the satilite pics of the pentagon I posted on Uncle Bob´s?
Steve Martin (GW)
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Uncle Bob´s what? I´ve seen thousands of Pentagon pics. Is there something unique about these? TIA...
wow
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
[link to www.unclebobs.com]
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Uncle Bob´s Forum

[link to unclebobs.infopop.cc]

GLP Threads can be found in "Time Out".
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
The top floors of the south tower fell onto #4 WTC and some of the Marriott hotel on the other side.
As the top floors fell the building was already giving out. I was at the south street sea port and you could see a definate lean to the building 20 minutes before it went down. There was a sense among the people standing near me of "when" the tower would fall not "if". Of course we thought it would tip over and not mostly collapse in on itself. But the tower was definatly collapsing when the top floors fell off into the street.
Better than you
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Why don´t you guys get a life instead of reading tea leaves in your precious pictures?
Undead
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Check this out.

You´ll like it.

This is a satellite pic of the pentagon on 9/12.

[link to www.spaceimaging.com]

The ´plane´ punched through at that small very dark spot to the left of the helipad.
(The most northern part of the damage the way this photo is oriented)

If you look close you can see the smaller hole through the C ring. (Left of the larger area of fire damage)

The plane came in what would be almost due south on this photo, and punched through that dark spot and reached the hole in the C ring.

Once you have a feeling for where the plane hit and which direction it came from, look at this.

[link to www.spaceimaging.com]

It´s the same image but from 5 days earlier.

Do you see what I see on the grass?

It looks like an aerial marker placed to guide the plane in to the pentagon.
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Did you see the satilite pics of the pentagon I posted on Uncle Bob´s?

link??????????????????????
1111
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
It was a scam to bring their blood for oil ´non-war´ of herr shrubs, "mission accomplished"


It is rather humorous that the shrub was the only pres to dress in the military flight gear and ride shotgun(definitely no Top Gun material)to declare Mission Accomplished.





So saddam really did blow the towers-


Geez, bush is truly a hollow ´male´---poor Laura


gwdance rocket :wino:
freemind
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
>WHAT CAUSED THAT!?!?!?<



GRAVITY!?!?!?!?
Steve Martin (GW)
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Freemind...you need to free your mind. Those floors should have crashed down ALONE in the plaza. Something caused the rest of the tower to crash straight down, pulling those floors more back into line with the true vertical the rest of the way as they fell.

Given that the weight and force of those upper floors was originally throwing itself out and away from the lower floors, what made those lower floors collapse?? The obvious answer...well-placed high explosives.

P.S. To others: This thread is not about the Pentagon...please start your own on that subject elsewhere. Thanks.
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
As mentioned before and as illustrated in this photo. [link to 911research.wtc7.net]
The building was already collapsing when the top floors tipped over.
controlled demo.
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
[link to www.plaguepuppy.net]
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
AC 10:14,

You´re dead wrong. The rest of the building definitely was not collapsing at all until well AFTER the top stories started toppling away. I have the whole thing on a good close-up video, and I´ve watched carefully a dozen times since you posted.
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Plague Puppy is still kicking ass I see!

Kudos!
God
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Hey Steve, would you please take the 1 train all the way downtown, get off, and then walk to the river and drown yourself. PLEASE!
Undead
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
"P.S. To others: This thread is not about the Pentagon...please start your own on that subject elsewhere. Thanks."

Well, you did ask for it. :)
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
The OP has provided a very compelling argument that the South Tower was "pulled" just as Silverstein is on record as ordering to be done to Building #7 .

I see their is no intelligent rebuttal of his evidence...just name calling and childish ranting from the naysayers.

I might add that it looks like TPTB have recruited a new batch of paid hacks...lots of new avatars that weren´t here before the site wnet down.

Also, does anyone know what happened to "Anders"? He and the OPer were two of the only posters on this site worth reading.
Undead
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
"I might add that it looks like TPTB have recruited a new batch of paid hacks...lots of new avatars that weren´t here before the site wnet down."

LOL

You have Way too high of an opinion of yourself.

Do you really think that everyone that disagrees with you is a snake person, I mean goverment agent?
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Undead,

You are precisely the type of person I was referring to. What are your benefits like?
Undead
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
The dental isn´t as good, but the retierment package is a lot beter than it was working for the snake people.
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
Steve, you mention, "angular momentum". Perhaps you should go away and find out what angular momentum is before you post here using the term. It just proves you do not know what you are talking about, making anything you have to say worthless.
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
AC 11:22,

Just looked it up. It applies here. Shut up!
Payment will be made.
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
I was there you stupid fuck. I saw it all, ALL! I don´t know what network you were watching on while having that 3rd cup of coffee. I was under a bread truck watching from about 300 yards. All this shit deserves to be posted on this Special Ed web site. Don´t jump out of any windows Einstein if it ever comes to your building. It makes a strange splat.
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
11:26.

You´re a moron too then?

Angular momentum measures an object´s tendency to continue to spin.

Yeah, you looked it up alright.
Anonymous Coward
12/08/2005 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top floors of the South Tower WERE breaking away at a sharp angle, then....
AC 11:53,

Those top floors were breaking away at an angle and they WERE BEGINNING TO SPIN towards the lowest fracture point of the impact. Get off your high horse asshole, and learn to discern the major point of a thesis before you choose a minor corollary that even if proven wrong (which this point hasn´t been) will have no affect at all upon the veracity of the original assumption.

News