These 17 panoramas and GIFs show the first moon landing in unbelievable detail

moon suits made of clothes should explode out of pure vacuum

British special effects artists are the best and Elstree is the home of the sci-fi blockbuster, that's why Kubrick moved there at the beginning of the American space programme in 1961.

Kubrick:

Spielberg:

My cellphone has more processing power than all the computers they used back then to reach the moon, think about it.

Funny you should mention 2001. Its moon scenes look nothing like Apollo and show signs of full gravity and no vacuum.

Completely digital effects prove what exactly about Apollo in 1969?

Kubrick was provably in England and busy with other projects when Apollo happened.

My cellphone has more processing power than all the computers they used back then to reach the moon, think about it.

And neither should they. Too pull off the Apollo hoax Kubrick had to make a film that was clearly inferior to his Apollo masterpiece and bring it out before the landings to give plausible deniability when questioned about Apollo. He could always point to 2001 and and say "Look, this is what I could do in 1968, clearly inferior to Apollo special effects footage".

I hate to break it to you but that sequence from Spielberg's Star Wars is almost entirely model shots and physical sets. There was no photorealistic CGI until Jurassic Park in 1993.

Obviously Kubrick was in England, he lived just a few miles from Elstree where he filmed Apollo.

 

That has him stumped

Or the far more likely, Kubrick wasn't involved. Apollo has clear evidence of vacuum and low gravity which could not be duplicated then.


Except that clip was from the special edition which was first redone in 1997 and touched up a few times later. The original with the models was not available in 1080p

And there is no evidence Apollo was filmed there.

Yes because Spielberg didn't shoot in 1080p

Star Wars was filmed on 35mm film stock, what you are looking at there is the original sequence made with full size sets for the actors and models for the long shots. There are a handful of added CGI effects, blink and you miss them.

They re-used the sets a number of times [link to supermania78.com]

 

Moon Zero Two, filmed at Elstree. That Lunar Lander look familiar?

[link to www.davidsissonmodels.co.uk]

And the space battle was redone in CGI. I watched it in the theater. The version with models was never available in 1080p because it was last released on DVD.
And it STILL proves NOTHING about Apollo

It is hilarious that you think that looks anything like Apollo. Are you trying to prove yourself a troll?

It's the Moon surface, not Superman dumbass.

When Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the Moon, they did what any tourist would do — take hundreds of photos.
A few of these images are more famous than others, like the one of Aldrin with Armstrong reflected in his visor, and the one of Aldrin looking at the American flag.

But people at NASA and contributors to the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal have painstakingly uploaded every single one of the photos from all six moon landings onto the Journal's website and Flickr page.

And what they've done that's really cool is figure out how some of them fit together to assemble larger photos, showing the lunar surface in unprecedented detail.

They even animated a few consecutive photos into GIFs, making you feel like you're on the Moon with Armstrong and Aldrin.

Here are 17 unbelievable constructed panoramas and GIFs from the historic Apollo 11 moon landing.
[link to www.businessinsider.com]

Doesn't look like Apollo. If you think it does you're either blind or a troll.

And it STILL doesn't look like Apollo, troll.

That is an actual original set from the 1969 landings, that's what you saw on TV back then.

 

It's not supposed to look as good as Kubrick's work, it was filmed in 1969 to distract attention from what he was doing next door and to explain why the Elstree model makers were so busy making a load of Apollo models. Plausible deniability remember.

 

Earth was about the same size as the moon is when we look at it from earth--it should be four times larger.

No blast hole under 10,000 lb thrust rockets on lunar lander.

No dust on legs on lunar lander from rocket blast.

Astronaut climbing down stairs of lunar lander is backlit.

A few photos with shadows not parallel.

Those are a few of anomalies just off the top of my head. If we went there, they faked these photos, but it's doubtful Apollo did go there.

I truly feel sorry for all you dumb notherfuckers that honestly believe we never went to the moon and all the photos are fake or whatever. You people either have been raised by idiots or are really retarded. Seriously. I can not understand what you must think reality is. It scares the hell out of me to think people like you will actually run this country one day. I hope you all wear a patch with the lunar lander in a circle with a line through it so if the shit ever hits the fan I can locate my first targets easily.

I truly feel sorry for all you dumb notherfuckers that honestly believe we never went to the moon and all the photos are fake or whatever. You people either have been raised by idiots or are really retarded. Seriously. I can not understand what you must think reality is. It scares the hell out of me to think people like you will actually run this country one day. I hope you all wear a patch with the lunar lander in a circle with a line through it so if the shit ever hits the fan I can locate my first targets easily.

Nobody is really dumb enough to believe we didn't go to the moon.
They just like to make sport.

Wrong