This is no lens flare! It IS the Red Kachina

I'd prefer a RubeTube video. /sarcasm



I stand corrected.

Can you now explain how you get red Cherenkov radiation and how you focus it into an almost point-like source?

Oh and can you explain why our oceans and lakes don't glow all the time with all the neutrinos hitting the water?

.

name of the game is distraction

:asboy2:

Sure.

Explain how these "Kachinas"s" show up where one would expect a lens flare, while also having the ability to shine through mountains. Why do they disappear as they rise into the sky? Why can't we go out and observe said Kachina right now? Let's start there.

Last Edited by Setheory on 04/20/2016 04:19 PM

Avoidance actually......from the facts.....

And by the way, I'm not at all afraid of considering alternative ideas.

See here:

Thread: NASA validates "WTF - Impossible" space drive. Interesting...UPDATED - 8/14/2017 (Page 15)

This actually has promise and is backed by data and testing. Some scientists don't like the thought of it. Me? I don't care.

It IS here...

Nibiru with it's plasma wings Caught on 3 German web camera's at the time 4/20/2016


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Now bugs on a Webcam dome are winged planets for the Nibiru tards.



.

Ok, ok. Let's assume that really is Nibiru. When do you stop going in to work? When will you stop paying your bills? When will you take your children out of school? Leave your home to head to safer ground?

You truthers love posting this shit and spreading fear and doom, but not a single one of you has any intention of backing it up with actions. If you truly believed that this video was 100% accurate and genuine, you would not be posting on this website, and still paying your mortgage, and still showing up for work. Hypocrite.

Starts off with GN 05.39.2 as well. Clearly he has no idea what it actually takes to see that nebula. You need something a bit more powerful than a webcam...

Even the T5 telescope couldn't really see it. It took T24 for it to really show up.
[link to www.itelescope.net]
Captured a real beauty of a picture of it though, still where it was in "Google Sky."
[link to nova.astrometry.net]

Last Edited by Astromut on 04/20/2016 05:19 PM

I'm still chuckling about the "Looks Like Hank Hill" name change.

I thought the exact same thing.

WOW

Go away for a few hours and miss the unveiling\unmasking

of the one and only Dr Asstroll

AKA

Looks Like Hank Shill.

This thread is comedy gold.

Thanks to the AC'S For showing us that smart is the new stupid.
A wee boy that loves playing with his rocket and trash talking anyone that mentions his small rocket.

Thanks AC.

Best laugh i have had in ages on these threads.

Looks Like Hank Shill and his Smearleaders took a kicking from you.

Very Noble of you AC.

If you can be bothered?
What is your thoughts on these videos.?





Especially this one.

And another one who contributes no substance at all. See, this is why the AC (and you) cannot "hurt me" at all. You offer nothing against the substance I provided.

Comedy gold? are you fucking kidding me?
So not only do you nibirutards believe in flares as a harbinger of doom but you also believe an AC who showed himself up was funny?
get the fuck out of here.

mocking someone because you have run out of flare videos as your proof is very funny

Ban this idiot already, he shouldnt be posting from school anyway.
:bane:

The only response you will ever get from me kid.

Of course, because you have nothing of substance to offer.

Another video showing that this is no joke people.

Something IS here...


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Potato face here explains how they all know about it.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

WOW - "CATALINA V4 IS NIBIRU"

Comet C/2013 V4 (Catalina) is Nibiru?

You never give up, Bulgaria OP, do you? - I mean you never give up in exposing your stupidity.


A quick search on C/2013 V4 (Catalina) would have exposed the maker of the video as a complete idiot.

C/2013 V4 (Catalina):

Hyperbolic orbit (e = 1.00271), one time visitor never coming back - isn't Nibiru supposed to have a 3600 year orbit?
Closest approach to the sun on Oct, 7, 2015 at 5.18 AU - isn't Nibiru supposed to approach the sun within 1 AU ( pass between Earth and the sun)?
Closest approach to Earth on Dec, 2, 2015 at 4.5 AU - isn't Nibiru supposed to approach Earth within some million kilometers or even hit it?
And just now the comet is 5.75 AU from Earth. [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov]

C/2013 V4 (Catalina) got never brighter that mag 14, was never visible to the naked eye and could be only captured with high tech equipment.
Here a photo of the comet around the time when it was at it's brightest: [link to www.aerith.net]

And don't all the videos you post show Nibiru within some degrees from the sun?
Where is the sun in said video? Oh wait, it's almost 65° to the left.

.

Can you give a short summary? - I don't waste 50 minutes of my time on the stupid guy who also made the Catalina V4 video.

.

^^^ Very profound answer ^^^
Run out of arguments?

.

NASA / ISS- TWO SUN ! NIBIRU /PLANET X ?? 16-04-20

Check this out...


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Look, four niburus. You are aware that this is filmed through a window?

And how can Nibiru be next to the sun, when it was 65° left of the sun in the video you posted two hours ago: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Again exposing your stupidity?

.

Tracking NIbiru as it travels West to East across two camera 4/23/2016

More for you to consider...


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

APRIL 22ND W.T.F. IS THIS IF IT'S NOT NIBIRU OR NEMESIS ??

Mhmm...


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]