I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65695781 United States 04/25/2016 11:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space Dr. Astro gave a far more complete answer to the radiation question. Predictably you ignored it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65695781 I answered simply that the radiation is not the same type. That is the truth. You want more then YOU find it. So far it looks like you don't really want an answer, you just want to argue. I though you didn't care what I think; what happened to that? I don't. If I did then I wouldn't be saying YOU need to find it and I wouldn't be saying YOU just want to argue. What part of that don't you get? Lol... you don't care but you keep talking at me. Replying when addressed and caring about someone who quickly resorted to the shill gambit are not the same thing. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 04/25/2016 11:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space Remember that the formula for gravitational force only concerns mass and distance, not motion. Cent. force is motion, ergo unaffected by gravity as long as the speed is constant. Quoting: Darth Snarkiest Here, you want the math? Here's the math. Gravity is only slightly countered by the centripetal force of earth's rotation. At the equator where the velocity is greatest, 1,700 km per hour, the corresponding centripetal acceleration is equal to v^2/r where v = 1,700 km per hour and r = 6,378,000 m. Converting that to meters per second you get v = 472.222 m/s, so the acceleration would be 0.03 m/s^2. Earth's gravity provides an acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2, the amount it is offset by earth's rotation is essentially negligible. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70238440 United States 04/25/2016 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space You're taking the analogy too far to the point it breaks down. The car is driving around inside a thick atmosphere, which is why you feel the wind if you take the doors off. That doesn't apply to the earth. Earth is effectively surrounded by a vacuum, there's nothing to give the sensation of motion if you take the atmosphere away. Quoting: Dr. Astro Then please explain this to all who claim that the atmosphere stuck to the earth's surface is why we don't experience the sensation of speed. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72096861 South Africa 04/25/2016 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space ... Quoting: Darth Snarkiest Irrelevant; the moon is spinning on its axis, thus centripetal force should fling off anything not attached to its surface. the centripetal force from one rotation every month is far, far smaller than the 1/6 g at the surface. Again, irrelevant. No, it isn't. If the centripetal force is less than the surface gravity then it's not a function of "time." The force is insufficient to overcome the surface gravity. Astro, do you not get tired of fighting with these brain dead turds day after day. Their stupidity tires me out just reading it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70238440 United States 04/25/2016 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space Remember that the formula for gravitational force only concerns mass and distance, not motion. Cent. force is motion, ergo unaffected by gravity as long as the speed is constant. Quoting: Darth Snarkiest Here, you want the math? Here's the math. Gravity is only slightly countered by the centripetal force of earth's rotation. At the equator where the velocity is greatest, 1,700 km per hour, the corresponding centripetal acceleration is equal to v^2/r where v = 1,700 km per hour and r = 6,378,000 m. Converting that to meters per second you get v = 472.222 m/s, so the acceleration would be 0.03 m/s^2. Earth's gravity provides an acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2, the amount it is offset by earth's rotation is essentially negligible. You're confusing vertical acceleration with angular momentum. Gravity pulls toward center mass, whereas cent. force is a perpendicular motion. And it still remains that gravitational force is ONLY concerned with mass and distance. Show me where the formula for gravitational force includes the motion of the two objects. If the earth stopped spinning, gravity would be unaffected. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72096861 South Africa 04/25/2016 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space Remember that the formula for gravitational force only concerns mass and distance, not motion. Cent. force is motion, ergo unaffected by gravity as long as the speed is constant. Quoting: Darth Snarkiest Here, you want the math? Here's the math. Gravity is only slightly countered by the centripetal force of earth's rotation. At the equator where the velocity is greatest, 1,700 km per hour, the corresponding centripetal acceleration is equal to v^2/r where v = 1,700 km per hour and r = 6,378,000 m. Converting that to meters per second you get v = 472.222 m/s, so the acceleration would be 0.03 m/s^2. Earth's gravity provides an acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2, the amount it is offset by earth's rotation is essentially negligible. You're trying to explain basic physics to types that you would not even talk to in real life, because you would just be able to see the moron in their brain dead eyes. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 04/25/2016 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space You're taking the analogy too far to the point it breaks down. The car is driving around inside a thick atmosphere, which is why you feel the wind if you take the doors off. That doesn't apply to the earth. Earth is effectively surrounded by a vacuum, there's nothing to give the sensation of motion if you take the atmosphere away. Quoting: Dr. Astro Then please explain this to all who claim that the atmosphere stuck to the earth's surface is why we don't experience the sensation of speed. I'm explaining it to you since you tried to make that argument just now. I don't know anyone else who makes that claim. If you do, great, now you can explain it to them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70716888 Sweden 04/25/2016 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space ... Quoting: Darth Snarkiest How much cent. force does it take to throw fine dust off the surface of a rock with no atmosphere? The atmosphere is not the issue. Surface gravity is. Atmosphere is supposed to be keeping things on earth's surface "contained" such that it's like riding in a car and not being aware of the windspeed due to this containment. No it isn't. That's not how it works at all. The atmosphere has nothing to do with it. Can we humans ruin our atmosphere and still continue living as before? If the atmosphere doesnt matter? Our air will stay put because of gravity? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70238440 United States 04/25/2016 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space Astro, do you not get tired of fighting with these brain dead turds day after day. Quoting: Anonymous Coward Their stupidity tires me out just reading it. What's stupid is continuing to read "brain dead turds" that make you tired. So is brown-nosing. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 04/25/2016 12:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space Remember that the formula for gravitational force only concerns mass and distance, not motion. Cent. force is motion, ergo unaffected by gravity as long as the speed is constant. Quoting: Darth Snarkiest Here, you want the math? Here's the math. Gravity is only slightly countered by the centripetal force of earth's rotation. At the equator where the velocity is greatest, 1,700 km per hour, the corresponding centripetal acceleration is equal to v^2/r where v = 1,700 km per hour and r = 6,378,000 m. Converting that to meters per second you get v = 472.222 m/s, so the acceleration would be 0.03 m/s^2. Earth's gravity provides an acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2, the amount it is offset by earth's rotation is essentially negligible. You're confusing vertical acceleration with angular momentum. No, I'm not. Gravity pulls toward center mass, whereas cent. force is a perpendicular motion. Quoting: SnarkiestCentripetal force is in the opposite direction of gravity. But it's insignificant compared to gravity. And it still remains that gravitational force is ONLY concerned with mass and distance. Show me where the formula for gravitational force includes the motion of the two objects. Quoting: SnarkiestI can't believe I even have to explain this. I just showed you that the centripetal force is insignificant COMPARED to gravity. Do you not understand what it means to COMPARE two values calculated separately? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70238440 United States 04/25/2016 12:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space You're taking the analogy too far to the point it breaks down. The car is driving around inside a thick atmosphere, which is why you feel the wind if you take the doors off. That doesn't apply to the earth. Earth is effectively surrounded by a vacuum, there's nothing to give the sensation of motion if you take the atmosphere away. Quoting: Dr. Astro Then please explain this to all who claim that the atmosphere stuck to the earth's surface is why we don't experience the sensation of speed. I'm explaining it to you since you tried to make that argument just now. I don't know anyone else who makes that claim. If you do, great, now you can explain it to them. I could go back through the thread, or other similar threads, and list them, but surely you've seen it many times. They claim that the atmosphere moving with the earth's surface is why we aren't sensing the speed. That's not my claim, and I didn't make it up. I made no such argument; I've argued against it. So, back to the OP: Since the atmosphere is irrelevant, then how would you convince the OP that the earth is indeed moving at a speed of 67,000 mph? |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 04/25/2016 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space You're taking the analogy too far to the point it breaks down. The car is driving around inside a thick atmosphere, which is why you feel the wind if you take the doors off. That doesn't apply to the earth. Earth is effectively surrounded by a vacuum, there's nothing to give the sensation of motion if you take the atmosphere away. Quoting: Dr. Astro Then please explain this to all who claim that the atmosphere stuck to the earth's surface is why we don't experience the sensation of speed. I'm explaining it to you since you tried to make that argument just now. I don't know anyone else who makes that claim. If you do, great, now you can explain it to them. I could go back through the thread, or other similar threads, and list them, but surely you've seen it many times. No, I haven't. They claim that the atmosphere moving with the earth's surface is why we aren't sensing the speed. Quoting: SnarkiestWell that is one reason. That's not the same as claiming that the atmosphere is what PREVENTS us from sensing the motion. If the atmosphere were not moving with earth but earth was instead plowing through it at high velocity, yes, you would certainly sense earth's motion. Considering that OP is a troll posting mathematical fallacies (seriously, he posted that "2+2=5" - how can you not realize that he's being insincere?), there is no convincing him. It would be a waste of time to talk about astronomy, and how distances and velocities to the sun, other planets and other stars can be measured. Last Edited by Astromut on 04/25/2016 12:10 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71512323 France 04/25/2016 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space 67,000 miles per hour miles per hour is a comcept made up by man. the earth doesnt give a fuck about your low level awareness imagine a bee flying around that bee is you. you land on a human that is walking 5 mph. as a bee, you wont even notice that you are moving because its slow compared to your normal speed time is relative |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 04/25/2016 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65695781 the centripetal force from one rotation every month is far, far smaller than the 1/6 g at the surface. Again, irrelevant. No, it isn't. If the centripetal force is less than the surface gravity then it's not a function of "time." The force is insufficient to overcome the surface gravity. Astro, do you not get tired of fighting with these brain dead turds day after day. Their stupidity tires me out just reading it. Personally I'm done trying to explain facts to trolls. It's a waste of time and it's not even like they actually believe the things they post. They're just here to try to wind people up. Had a particularly nasty troll last week who went too far trying to accuse me of rape. I'm done with those fucktards. I'm much more interested in discussing science with people who at least appear to be sincere and interested in an honest discussion. Sure, some of them might be trolls as well, but if they're not even going to invest the effort to at least look like a sincere poster then they're not worth debating. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70238440 United States 04/25/2016 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space My apologies for writing "centripetal" instead of "centrifugal". Centrifugal force is perpendicular to the centripetal force. It goes in a circular path around a center point. In that experiment where you put a weight on a string and whirl it around over your head, then let go of the string, the weight does not fly in a circle and does not fly towards your hand; it flies away at a tangent to the circle. But you are in error about centripetal force; it IS the direction of gravity: In Newtonian mechanics, gravity provides the centripetal force responsible for astronomical orbits. Quoting: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] You said centripetal force is opposite, whereas it's the same. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2338725 Canada 04/25/2016 12:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69463905 United States 04/25/2016 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72096861 South Africa 04/25/2016 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space Astro, do you not get tired of fighting with these brain dead turds day after day. Quoting: Anonymous Coward Their stupidity tires me out just reading it. What's stupid is continuing to read "brain dead turds" that make you tired. So is brown-nosing. Typical brain dead reply. Why? Because like a moron you assume that I (and others) would read every single post of your little mind trying to get a grasp on reality. No, I normally read the first post and then the last. In this case I can only shake my head. SIX PAGES OF STUPIDITY. Let me explain it to you like I explained it to my 5 year old daughter. Firstly image you can see the atoms of all matter. Thus you do not see land, or air, but you see a massive ball of atoms. The denser atoms are in the center and the less denser atoms are on the surface of the ball. In this case the less denser atoms is the air. Take into consideration that the whole ball of atoms are spinning uniformly in the VACUUM OF SPACE. Now if cannot understand this, you are either a troll or seriously retarded, in which case I would advise you to kill yourself in order to extinguish your blood line. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 04/25/2016 12:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space My apologies for writing "centripetal" instead of "centrifugal". Centrifugal force is perpendicular to the centripetal force. It goes in a circular path around a center point. In that experiment where you put a weight on a string and whirl it around over your head, then let go of the string, the weight does not fly in a circle and does not fly towards your hand; it flies away at a tangent to the circle. But you are in error about centripetal force; it IS the direction of gravity: In Newtonian mechanics, gravity provides the centripetal force responsible for astronomical orbits. Quoting: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] You said centripetal force is opposite, whereas it's the same. You're deeply, deeply confused. It's not the same. If it were the same then you're saying that objects that are quickly rotating will hold onto objects on their surface more tightly. Why don't you get this? You just went from claiming that objects on the moon and earth should be flung off by rotation to making an even more senseless claim that they should be held onto by rotation. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70238440 United States 04/25/2016 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space Astro, do you not get tired of fighting with these brain dead turds day after day. Quoting: Anonymous Coward Their stupidity tires me out just reading it. What's stupid is continuing to read "brain dead turds" that make you tired. So is brown-nosing. Typical brain dead reply. Why? Because like a moron you assume that I (and others) would read every single post of your little mind trying to get a grasp on reality.... Now if cannot understand this, you are either a troll or seriously retarded, in which case I would advise you to kill yourself in order to extinguish your blood line. And this is supposed to be the writing of an intelligent non-troll, whose opinion should count. Wow. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72096861 South Africa 04/25/2016 12:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space No, it isn't. If the centripetal force is less than the surface gravity then it's not a function of "time." The force is insufficient to overcome the surface gravity. Astro, do you not get tired of fighting with these brain dead turds day after day. Their stupidity tires me out just reading it. Personally I'm done trying to explain facts to trolls. It's a waste of time and it's not even like they actually believe the things they post. They're just here to try to wind people up. Had a particularly nasty troll last week who went too far trying to accuse me of rape. I'm done with those fucktards. I'm much more interested in discussing science with people who at least appear to be sincere and interested in an honest discussion. Sure, some of them might be trolls as well, but if they're not even going to invest the effort to at least look like a sincere poster then they're not worth debating. Google Dunning/Kruger. They are too stupid to realize that they are stupid. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70238440 United States 04/25/2016 12:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space My apologies for writing "centripetal" instead of "centrifugal". Centrifugal force is perpendicular to the centripetal force. It goes in a circular path around a center point. In that experiment where you put a weight on a string and whirl it around over your head, then let go of the string, the weight does not fly in a circle and does not fly towards your hand; it flies away at a tangent to the circle. But you are in error about centripetal force; it IS the direction of gravity: In Newtonian mechanics, gravity provides the centripetal force responsible for astronomical orbits. Quoting: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] You said centripetal force is opposite, whereas it's the same. You're deeply, deeply confused. It's not the same. If it were the same then you're saying that objects that are quickly rotating will hold onto objects on their surface more tightly. Why don't you get this? You just went from claiming that objects on the moon and earth should be flung off by rotation to making an even more senseless claim that they should be held onto by rotation. I gave a link to the article I quoted; if it's in error, perhaps you could correct it. They said that gravity provides the centripetal force , meaning gravity = centripetal force, so it can't be opposite. They are the ones who are confused; I only quoted them. I never said anything on the surface of a spinning ball should be held on by rotation; nothing even close to that. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72096861 South Africa 04/25/2016 12:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space Astro, do you not get tired of fighting with these brain dead turds day after day. Quoting: Anonymous Coward Their stupidity tires me out just reading it. What's stupid is continuing to read "brain dead turds" that make you tired. So is brown-nosing. Typical brain dead reply. Why? Because like a moron you assume that I (and others) would read every single post of your little mind trying to get a grasp on reality.... Now if cannot understand this, you are either a troll or seriously retarded, in which case I would advise you to kill yourself in order to extinguish your blood line. And this is supposed to be the writing of an intelligent non-troll, whose opinion should count. Wow. LOL Fuck off cunt. I do not debate stupid. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72096861 South Africa 04/25/2016 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space My apologies for writing "centripetal" instead of "centrifugal". Centrifugal force is perpendicular to the centripetal force. It goes in a circular path around a center point. In that experiment where you put a weight on a string and whirl it around over your head, then let go of the string, the weight does not fly in a circle and does not fly towards your hand; it flies away at a tangent to the circle. But you are in error about centripetal force; it IS the direction of gravity: In Newtonian mechanics, gravity provides the centripetal force responsible for astronomical orbits. Quoting: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] You said centripetal force is opposite, whereas it's the same. You're deeply, deeply confused. It's not the same. If it were the same then you're saying that objects that are quickly rotating will hold onto objects on their surface more tightly. Why don't you get this? You just went from claiming that objects on the moon and earth should be flung off by rotation to making an even more senseless claim that they should be held onto by rotation. I gave a link to the article I quoted; if it's in error, perhaps you could correct it. They said that gravity provides the centripetal force , meaning gravity = centripetal force, so it can't be opposite. They are the ones who are confused; I only quoted them. I never said anything on the surface of a spinning ball should be held on by rotation; nothing even close to that. I mean listen to this brain dead fuckwit. Centripedal force is caused by SPIN moron. Sorry Astro, I'm out of here, as I do not debate stupid. All you can really do with stupid is to mock and insult. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70238440 United States 04/25/2016 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space ... Quoting: Darth Snarkiest My apologies for writing "centripetal" instead of "centrifugal". Centrifugal force is perpendicular to the centripetal force. It goes in a circular path around a center point. In that experiment where you put a weight on a string and whirl it around over your head, then let go of the string, the weight does not fly in a circle and does not fly towards your hand; it flies away at a tangent to the circle. But you are in error about centripetal force; it IS the direction of gravity: ... You said centripetal force is opposite, whereas it's the same. You're deeply, deeply confused. It's not the same. If it were the same then you're saying that objects that are quickly rotating will hold onto objects on their surface more tightly. Why don't you get this? You just went from claiming that objects on the moon and earth should be flung off by rotation to making an even more senseless claim that they should be held onto by rotation. I gave a link to the article I quoted; if it's in error, perhaps you could correct it. They said that gravity provides the centripetal force , meaning gravity = centripetal force, so it can't be opposite. They are the ones who are confused; I only quoted them. I never said anything on the surface of a spinning ball should be held on by rotation; nothing even close to that. I mean listen to this brain dead fuckwit. Centripedal force is caused by SPIN moron. Sorry Astro, I'm out of here, as I do not debate stupid. All you can really do with stupid is to mock and insult. I'm in awe of your ignorance. Go to the link and see for yourself; centripetal force pulls toward center mass. If it didn't, the circular force would stop and the forward momentum of the object would take it off the circle at a tangent. When you whirl a weight around above your head by a string, your arm and the string are supplying centripetal (center-directed) force, which keeps the object from flying off. Centrifugal force is trying to pull the object away in a straight line. This is elementary physics. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72096861 South Africa 04/25/2016 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space ... Quoting: Darth Snarkiest My apologies for writing "centripetal" instead of "centrifugal". Centrifugal force is perpendicular to the centripetal force. It goes in a circular path around a center point. In that experiment where you put a weight on a string and whirl it around over your head, then let go of the string, the weight does not fly in a circle and does not fly towards your hand; it flies away at a tangent to the circle. But you are in error about centripetal force; it IS the direction of gravity: ... You said centripetal force is opposite, whereas it's the same. You're deeply, deeply confused. It's not the same. If it were the same then you're saying that objects that are quickly rotating will hold onto objects on their surface more tightly. Why don't you get this? You just went from claiming that objects on the moon and earth should be flung off by rotation to making an even more senseless claim that they should be held onto by rotation. I gave a link to the article I quoted; if it's in error, perhaps you could correct it. They said that gravity provides the centripetal force , meaning gravity = centripetal force, so it can't be opposite. They are the ones who are confused; I only quoted them. I never said anything on the surface of a spinning ball should be held on by rotation; nothing even close to that. I mean listen to this brain dead fuckwit. Centripedal force is caused by SPIN moron. Sorry Astro, I'm out of here, as I do not debate stupid. All you can really do with stupid is to mock and insult. One more... You probably do not realize that I was mocking your use of the word centripedal. |
thisisathirtycharacternickname User ID: 71998480 Belgium 04/25/2016 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 55240075 United States 04/25/2016 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space My apologies for writing "centripetal" instead of "centrifugal". Centrifugal force is perpendicular to the centripetal force. It goes in a circular path around a center point. In that experiment where you put a weight on a string and whirl it around over your head, then let go of the string, the weight does not fly in a circle and does not fly towards your hand; it flies away at a tangent to the circle. But you are in error about centripetal force; it IS the direction of gravity: In Newtonian mechanics, gravity provides the centripetal force responsible for astronomical orbits. Quoting: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] You said centripetal force is opposite, whereas it's the same. You're deeply, deeply confused. It's not the same. If it were the same then you're saying that objects that are quickly rotating will hold onto objects on their surface more tightly. Why don't you get this? You just went from claiming that objects on the moon and earth should be flung off by rotation to making an even more senseless claim that they should be held onto by rotation. I gave a link to the article I quoted; if it's in error, perhaps you could correct it. They said that gravity provides the centripetal force , meaning gravity = centripetal force, so it can't be opposite. They are the ones who are confused; I only quoted them. I never said anything on the surface of a spinning ball should be held on by rotation; nothing even close to that. By claiming gravity is in the same direction you ARE claiming that anything on the surface of a spinning ball should be held on by rotation sir. If on the other hand you agree with me that rotation works to counter gravity than you must accept my calculations showing it's insignificant compared to gravity, sir. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70238440 United States 04/25/2016 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space No need to believe, you can try and prove or disprove it for yourself. Quoting: thisisathirtycharacternickname Simple experiment as I've mentioned twice: put a weight on the end of a string. Start whirling the object in circles over your head. Let go of the string. The object will fly off in a straight line. Centrifugal force is the angular momentum or circular motion; centripetal force is the string and arm holding the object from flying off. Gravity is the centripetal force; the spin of the earth is the centrifugal force. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72096861 South Africa 04/25/2016 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: I really have a hard time believing that the Earth is moving at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour through space No need to believe, you can try and prove or disprove it for yourself. Quoting: thisisathirtycharacternickname Simple experiment as I've mentioned twice: put a weight on the end of a string. Start whirling the object in circles over your head. Let go of the string. The object will fly off in a straight line. Centrifugal force is the angular momentum or circular motion; centripetal force is the string and arm holding the object from flying off. Gravity is the centripetal force; the spin of the earth is the centrifugal force. Astro we have signs of brain activity. Now Einstein, you just need to work out which force is bigger and you have your answer. |