The best 911 explanation available | |
Fool User ID: 142889 Canada 12/15/2006 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 170188 China 12/15/2006 11:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thundercheeks User ID: 169897 Australia 12/15/2006 11:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 166159 United States 12/15/2006 11:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have heard/thought about this before. It was readily apparent to me that we were all supposed to have been in detention camps by now. Thinking that actually inspires hope because TPTB have, in a way, already lost. Specifically the idea of flight 93 decapitating the structure of government hence leading to martial law has been mentioned among 911 thinkers a while ago. I believe it was Col. Don de Grand-Pre (ret.) that first floated the idea a couple years ago. The twist of operational screwups changing the foreign invasion plans does seem new though. And a nuclear or "all out" strike does fit in well with the psychopathic profile of those in charge. The invasions as they were done would clearly never succeed long term. I have also heard, but not bothered to note, which Air National Guard unit the fighter pilot that shot down Fl 93 came from. Anyhow, none of this is for the uninitiated. The 911 Truth movement of today, as a whole, isn't interested in speculation. But it's just so much fun for those of us bored by typical discourse. In closing, just remember to have no fear. Things did not go as the psychopaths planned. They are not invincible. The fact that we aren't already in labor camps means that we can win. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 153788 United States 12/15/2006 11:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Fool User ID: 142889 Canada 12/15/2006 11:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 160235 United States 12/15/2006 11:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | not only that there were two crash sites in Pennsylvania over eight miles of wreckage was discovered and this has been hushed up,and under reported in the media there were good people working for America that day who shot down two planes and sent a missile into the pentagon to stop the shadow government from running the operation any further |
Fool User ID: 142889 Canada 12/16/2006 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nineor nli User ID: 29943 United States 12/16/2006 12:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Daniel User ID: 170213 United Kingdom 12/16/2006 12:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have also heard, but not bothered to note, which Air National Guard unit the fighter pilot that shot down Fl 93 came from. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 166159It was N or S Dakota Natl Guard - out of Newark. My First solid evidence was the FLT 93 Shoot down. The evening of 9/11 I found a CHEAP website, typewritten. A HAM radio operator who listened to the F16 pilot banter. And Posted that the Dakota Ntl Grd Pilot SHOT DOWN FLT 93. A fellow HAM friend confirmed through a friend that he knew -An Officer in the Dakota Natl Grd. FLT 93 was Indeed SHOT DOWN. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ FWIW - FLT 93 Takeoff was delayed and finally - just 2 mins before the First HIT at WTC 1. That delay FOULED up the Plans of Cheney who was Running the 9/11 Operation from the War Room of the Underground Bunker!!! Daniel |
Daniel User ID: 170213 United Kingdom 12/16/2006 12:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | there were good people working for America that day who shot down two planes and sent a missile into the pentagon to stop the shadow government from running the operation any further Quoting: Anonymous Coward 160235Expanding on that Possibility: There was the warning to Junior bush on AF #1 on a "SECURE LINE" - showing they had the "CODES" to the innermost workings of DOD and Nuke Codes - then it was hushed up. Could be they were Constitution Supporters - as opposed to the NWO Bush Cabal. +++++++++++++++++++++++++ IMHO - Pgon WAS most likely a MISSLE HIT - The hit was Naval Intelligence - the OLDEST Intel agency - next was OSS - then CIA - Navy had Ports ALL over the World, thus their Intel Capability. I thought the Pgon NI HIT was a message or warning to those Constitution Supporters - or destroy their capabilities. Daniel |
j.s.g. User ID: 170249 United States 12/16/2006 12:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 163551 United States 12/16/2006 12:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Agreed, which is why I am so adamant about the fact that chasing conspiracy theories at the WTC is rather pointless at this point - the true focus should be on Flights 77 and 93, and all the "Let's Roll" bullshit. Where are all the independent accounts of eyewitnesses to the Pentagon strike, a la the TWA800 eyewitnesses (of whom I spoke with a few personally). They can bullshit the masses, but get down to the nitty gritty and it becomes quite apparent what really happened just from that info. There were also eyewitnesses in PA who reported massive AIRBORNE debris, which obviously fucks up the whole story since there should not have been ANY airborne debris according to the official story. Conspiracy researchers just continue to bark up all the wrong trees IMO... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 160219 United States 12/16/2006 01:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I thought the missile in the pentagon was to destroy the accounting offices and staff, after rummy announced the day before that 2.3 trillion was missing. OK, check out the report from the washington post just hours after the attack. What part of this was not pre-scripted? It was a fucking brilliant plan! Security Officials Trying to Identify Culprit By Steven Mufson Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2001; 1:01 p.m. [link to a188.g.akamaitech.net] Suspicions turned immediately to the former Saudi businessman Osama bin Laden, who has been coordinating terrorism attacks against the United States from bases in Afghanistan and who the United States tried unsuccessfully to target in cruise missile attacks during President Bill Clinton’s administration. “My view is it’s probably a bin Laden operation, given the complexity of the operation and given the targets’ high visibility,” said Blitzer, who noted that bin Laden has issued calls for his followers to bring war home to Americans. And many other terrorism experts said that the nature of the attacks -- coordinated, probably involving pilots, involving people willing to commit suicide during the attacks and requiring substantial financial resources -- pointed to bin Laden, Iraq or some other similar group. But other security experts warned against leaping to judgment, noting that the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 that was carried out by Americans was initially suspected to be the work of foreign agents. When the United States figures out who to blame, however, the retaliation is likely to be fierce and may call for a new level of mobilization by U.S. forces. “This is the Pearl Harbor of American terrorism,” said Larry Johnson, a former CIA and State Department terrorism official. “Just as occurred with Pearl Harbor, we’ll get through this. But as Pearl Harbor awakened the United States to a war that it was unwilling to fight, this will have a similar effect. These groups that have called for killing Americans and gone unscathed are going to pay the price. We will overcome the grief, but after the grief, there’s a rage.” |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 160219 United States 12/16/2006 01:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.angelfire.com] The following is snipped from Government plans to use Flight 93 cockpit tapes in Moussaoui trial "An official for NetJets, a company that sells shares in private business aircraft, confirmed that the plane tracking Flight 93 belonged to the company. The official, who asked not to be identified by name, said the company was asked not to comment on the Sept. 11 flight but would not say who made the request." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ END SNIP ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The owner of NetJets is one Warren Buffet who has already been linked to 9-11 due to the fact that A) GW went to see Warren first, at USSTRATCOM at Offut AFB and B) Buffet has his hands in remote pilotting via Mitre Corporation AND Berkshire Hathaway (pertinent given the experts that have sworn that the 9-11 planes were remote pilotted) and C) Buffet was entertaining at least one CEO from the WTC on 9-11 at USSTRATCOM whose command has been merged with USSPACECOM's (NORAD - explaining the synchronous convenience to the perpetrators of that terrorism that NORAD never reacted) to provide a singular command system under the technical management of SI International. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 92280 United States 12/16/2006 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21470 United States 12/16/2006 01:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 166671 China 12/16/2006 01:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 166671 China 12/16/2006 03:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 166671 China 12/16/2006 05:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 166671 China 12/16/2006 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28401 United States 12/16/2006 10:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 166671 China 12/16/2006 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 170362 United Kingdom 12/16/2006 10:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Shadow User ID: 167681 Canada 12/16/2006 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When you realise this truth, suddenly many of the loose ends click into place. Suddenly, so much makes sense. So many of the Bush "incompetancies" are shown to be not incompetance, but quickstepping out a contingency. The inept neoCon scrambling and bumbling of the invasion is suddenly very clearly a group of well rehearsed, well disciplined, well planned people wrongfooted by the most unexpected of cockups. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 170188Yeah. It explains a lot. Over the side and damn the barracuda |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 166671 China 12/16/2006 11:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When you realise this truth, suddenly many of the loose ends click into place. Suddenly, so much makes sense. So many of the Bush "incompetancies" are shown to be not incompetance, but quickstepping out a contingency. The inept neoCon scrambling and bumbling of the invasion is suddenly very clearly a group of well rehearsed, well disciplined, well planned people wrongfooted by the most unexpected of cockups. Quoting: ShadowYeah. It explains a lot. I agree, 911 makes a lot more sense when you read the OP. I wish this was pinned. |
SHR Forum Administrator User ID: 166322 United States 12/16/2006 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I always have to ask this question to the Martial Law people...WHY? Why would our Gov't or any Gov't want to have to herd all you tards into camps and then be forced to take care of you, why? It would instantly train wreck the economy, there would be shit for work, and in case you don't keep track of current events, the frikin Gov't already controls us all in most ways already. What do you think they think they would gain from it? Shut down the press? Woopty fuckin do, most of you already believe they own and control it already so what good would that do? What're you doing or were doing that is so scary important that the evil shadow gov't would gain from enacting martial law and shutting your activities down? What, bitching on the internet? I got news for you, the powerfull are already powerfull, super wealthy already super wealthy and it's been business as usual for a hundred years, you don't really think you were fucking up their game and they are afriad or something do you? LOL, puleeze. So I ask again, what is there to gain? Unless you believe that we were going to be herded into camps to be processed for alien food or something the answer is squat, everything the elite have going for them now lost and dick to gain except having to take care of a bunch of sheeples that can no longer generate the wealth and power that make the elite what? elite. Use your brain, it's a shit plan. ____________________________________________________ E-mail anytime [email protected] Inquiring about a ban?, include the IP address found here. [link to www.showmemyip.com] Ooooh, see the fire is sweepin' Our very streets today... Burns like a red coal carpet, Mad bulls lost the way... War, children, it's just a shot away...it's just a shot away.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 163934 United States 12/16/2006 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The "best" 911 explanation is bullcrap. First of all, the gov't was attacked; the pentagon was hit. So martial law could have been declared because of that. Secondly, if martial law was the objective, there has been plenty of opportunities to stage other attacks in 5+ years. Also, martial law could be invoked in other ways -- by crashing the economy or the stock market for instance. Instead, the economy and stock market are CONTINUALLY propped. TPTB are doing everything to avert martial law at this point. It's not a goal. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 167360 United States 12/16/2006 11:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Fool User ID: 142889 Canada 12/16/2006 11:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ok... about martial law... have you ever considered the idea that it's not really about the U.S.? It's global, so I could see martial law as being enforced to control all information, I assume internet is part of that... From there, they can launch more attacks on the U.S. and all over the world. I would guess it's to take full and complete control in one giant sweep. That way everyone feels attacked and it all goes to war, and from the ashes rises a new world government. Unknown to the public is that the war was against the public, and not countries/religions "striking" them No doubt they media is controlled, and all is being watched, but that is still a step away from complete lockdown/control. During 9/11... I doubt there were sincerely that many people that would indeed be jailed because the conspiracy stuff expanded as the 9/11 truth shit started. Most likely they wouldn't really keep prisoners, they'd just kill em, and the enconomy would go full steam ahead based on supplying for war. In that way, it would be easy to blame any countries, including Iran, and then self defense would be shown to be as actually attacking. That's my quick guess as to why they'd want martial law As for why they haven't done it again since that time, I have no idea, they are boasting about how secure the nation is, so perhaps they're setting it up to fall through the economy/stock market as has been said in posts above me |