3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California.

Users Online Now: 1,694 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 38,224
Pageviews Today: 53,047	Threads Today: 34	Posts Today: 274
12:25 AM

Page 1 Bottom Search Replies Previous Page Next Page
Search Terms: Highlight Matches
3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33260253 United States 05/23/2016 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California. [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] M3.5 - 7km NW of Rancho Cucamonga, California III DYFI? IV ShakeMap Location Contributed by CI1 last updated 2016-05-24 02:30:33 (UTC) 100 km 50 mi 34.170°N 117.633°W depth=10.5 km (6.5 mi) View interactive map Time 2016-05-24 02:28:26 (UTC) 2016-05-23 22:28:26 (UTC-04:00) in your timezone

Anonymous Coward User ID: 70754183 United States 05/23/2016 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70434034 United States 05/23/2016 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California. Is that very strong? (For the area) Seems like maybe not a big deal. WHY the BS flag??? It's listed, it happened.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70754183 United States 05/23/2016 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California. Is that very strong? (For the area) Seems like maybe not a big deal. WHY the BS flag??? It's listed, it happened. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70434034 Because I get paid to debunk social media comments and posts about all the increased earthquake activity around the globe. I know, I know...but it's not like we can do anything about it and until it happens, I still gotta pay the mortage.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39232377 United States 05/23/2016 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California. Felt it. Not a big deal, in the scheme of things...but it has been pretty quiet here lately. This could definitely be a sign of bigger things to come as the San Andreas warms up to let loose the Big One.
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 33260253 United States 05/23/2016 10:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California. Is that very strong? (For the area) Seems like maybe not a big deal. WHY the BS flag??? It's listed, it happened. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70434034 It a precursor to something bigger
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64115268 United States 05/23/2016 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California. I am 35 miles to the South and my couch vibrated seriously, but no a big deal,, for now !!

Anonymous Coward User ID: 45272837 United States 05/23/2016 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California. That's my favorite city name. RANCHO...CUcaMONGAAAHHH
Wookiee666 User ID: 62421844 United States 05/23/2016 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California. 3.5? that ain't nuthin', things start rollin at about 5.5. Warning: JustSomeGuy_42 is a publicly confessed unvaxxed neophiliac . If the number 666 is considered evil. then technically, 25.8069758 is the root of all evil.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70434034 United States 05/23/2016 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California. Is that very strong? (For the area) Seems like maybe not a big deal. WHY the BS flag??? It's listed, it happened. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70434034 It a precursor to something bigger Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33260253 HOPE NOT! Praying for you folks in CA, Op.
tucson ranger User ID: 68473522 United States 05/23/2016 11:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga, California. Geez barely an earth fart, Probably on the San Jacinto Fault or the Rancho Cook fault... I Live in Crestline about 0.5 mile from the SAF as the crow flies..this is nothing
Page 1 Top Previous Page Next Page

Related Threads

GLP