You are not him | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2644086 United States 06/14/2016 10:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | :hmmm: Quoting: Facts>feelings So objectively observing and discussing these attributes apparently makes you tptb and/or some kind of enemy. Interesting. It's also interesting how they all view those attributes as making that person "safe". No matter what they say or and do and something else I've always noticed is the ones who think they are the one only argue with those who don't also think they are the one. The situation is a bit more complex than that and it derived from the very shaping of the character/archetype. I think that the arguing is strongly tied with a need of validation not only as a "physical carrier" of the archetype but also as a validation of the archetype's/character's traits/qualities. I may be wrong on this of course, as i didn't take as much time as you did to observe the cause and the effects related to the subject. My best method is emotionless. I only watch stimuli and reactions. I end up with a list of hard facts that can be applied. That gives me a set of facts that at first I don't know why they work necessarily because I hadn't researched it from that angle purposely, that wasn't my objective, but they work just the same with or without my understanding why regardless. It's a means to strip a problem away from the distractions meant to cloak others from its basic building blocks. Why do I like the idea of being hyper-analyzed? You're a pervert? Lol. Idk. Maybe it's flattering in some way? Or maybe looking for confirmation from an objective third party about something to do with yourself you think may be true? |
S__ User ID: 72167800 Russia 06/14/2016 10:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My best method is emotionless. I only watch stimuli and reactions. I end up with a list of hard facts that can be applied. Quoting: Facts>feelings That gives me a set of facts that at first I don't know why they work necessarily because I hadn't researched it from that angle purposely, that wasn't my objective, but they work just the same with or without my understanding why regardless. It's a means to strip a problem away from the distractions meant to cloak others from its basic building blocks. Basically I treat something like a thing. An alien. I apply stimuli and record reactions. I end up with a do and don't type list of information. Though I may still not know what I'm studying sometimes I know what it reacts to and in what ways. Quoting: Facts>feelings Yeah. I've figured out something on that line :-) On the other hand, you too are a piece of the architecture (in making) of this archetype - through the "experiments" you are conducting on the subjects related to it. You may say that even the observers are part of the architecture and i can't disagree with that :-) It's an interesting situation - with both sad and funny sides of it :-) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2644086 United States 06/14/2016 10:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My best method is emotionless. I only watch stimuli and reactions. I end up with a list of hard facts that can be applied. Quoting: Facts>feelings That gives me a set of facts that at first I don't know why they work necessarily because I hadn't researched it from that angle purposely, that wasn't my objective, but they work just the same with or without my understanding why regardless. It's a means to strip a problem away from the distractions meant to cloak others from its basic building blocks. Basically I treat something like a thing. An alien. I apply stimuli and record reactions. I end up with a do and don't type list of information. Though I may still not know what I'm studying sometimes I know what it reacts to and in what ways. Quoting: Facts>feelings Yeah. I've figured out something on that line :-) On the other hand, you too are a piece of the architecture (in making) of this archetype - through the "experiments" you are conducting on the subjects related to it. You may say that even the observers are part of the architecture and i can't disagree with that :-) It's an interesting situation - with both sad and funny sides of it :-) Yes I imagine I can feel like the eye of sauron bearing down and disecting a target to some ppl sometimes. But that in itself is a stimuli with measurable reactions. :eyeofsauron: |
S__ User ID: 72167800 Russia 06/14/2016 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just realized that this thread now has beaten my record (for longest). Quoting: I_am_who_I_am Not that it even remotely compares to the amazing quality of things that people posted in my second longest: Thread: I almost hate posting this because it is sad. How do we escape this viscous soul sucking reality? Congrats ! Meh. I am well over 500x prouder of the other one. But maybe this has potential. UM's thread is quite a feat to live up to though. TBH i still don't understand the purpose of the thread - except for gathering attention from the already known participants to these kind of threads (And if that was the case, you should be proud of the achievement). |
I_am_who_I_am (OP) User ID: 58352135 United States 06/14/2016 10:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: S__ The situation is a bit more complex than that and it derived from the very shaping of the character/archetype. I think that the arguing is strongly tied with a need of validation not only as a "physical carrier" of the archetype but also as a validation of the archetype's/character's traits/qualities. I may be wrong on this of course, as i didn't take as much time as you did to observe the cause and the effects related to the subject. My best method is emotionless. I only watch stimuli and reactions. I end up with a list of hard facts that can be applied. That gives me a set of facts that at first I don't know why they work necessarily because I hadn't researched it from that angle purposely, that wasn't my objective, but they work just the same with or without my understanding why regardless. It's a means to strip a problem away from the distractions meant to cloak others from its basic building blocks. Why do I like the idea of being hyper-analyzed? You're a pervert? Lol. Idk. Maybe it's flattering in some way? Or maybe looking for confirmation from an objective third party about something to do with yourself you think may be true? I am not going to think too deep about it. Who knows. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2644086 United States 06/14/2016 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Facts>feelings My best method is emotionless. I only watch stimuli and reactions. I end up with a list of hard facts that can be applied. That gives me a set of facts that at first I don't know why they work necessarily because I hadn't researched it from that angle purposely, that wasn't my objective, but they work just the same with or without my understanding why regardless. It's a means to strip a problem away from the distractions meant to cloak others from its basic building blocks. Why do I like the idea of being hyper-analyzed? You're a pervert? Lol. Idk. Maybe it's flattering in some way? Or maybe looking for confirmation from an objective third party about something to do with yourself you think may be true? I am not going to think too deep about it. Who knows. You asked |
S__ User ID: 72167800 Russia 06/14/2016 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My best method is emotionless. I only watch stimuli and reactions. I end up with a list of hard facts that can be applied. Quoting: Facts>feelings That gives me a set of facts that at first I don't know why they work necessarily because I hadn't researched it from that angle purposely, that wasn't my objective, but they work just the same with or without my understanding why regardless. It's a means to strip a problem away from the distractions meant to cloak others from its basic building blocks. Basically I treat something like a thing. An alien. I apply stimuli and record reactions. I end up with a do and don't type list of information. Though I may still not know what I'm studying sometimes I know what it reacts to and in what ways. Quoting: Facts>feelings Yeah. I've figured out something on that line :-) On the other hand, you too are a piece of the architecture (in making) of this archetype - through the "experiments" you are conducting on the subjects related to it. You may say that even the observers are part of the architecture and i can't disagree with that :-) It's an interesting situation - with both sad and funny sides of it :-) Yes I imagine I can feel like the eye of sauron bearing down and disecting a target to some ppl sometimes. But that in itself is a stimuli with measurable reactions. Hahaha :-)) You evil, you ! Eye of Sauron, aye ? On a more serious note, that sauron eye resembles so well to a mandorla (aureola). |
I_am_who_I_am (OP) User ID: 58352135 United States 06/14/2016 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just realized that this thread now has beaten my record (for longest). Quoting: I_am_who_I_am Not that it even remotely compares to the amazing quality of things that people posted in my second longest: Thread: I almost hate posting this because it is sad. How do we escape this viscous soul sucking reality? Congrats ! Meh. I am well over 500x prouder of the other one. But maybe this has potential. UM's thread is quite a feat to live up to though. TBH i still don't understand the purpose of the thread - except for gathering attention from the already known participants to these kind of threads (And if that was the case, you should be proud of the achievement). I was annoyed at them all after reading the camo thread and just wanted to vent that they are not this dude, especially if they have had not a single obstacle in their lives. What percentage of them just have seen a few weird things, or think they know special information, or just feel special... and assume that means they are going to save the world? I dunno there really was no purpose besides me venting. |
I_am_who_I_am (OP) User ID: 58352135 United States 06/14/2016 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You're a pervert? Lol. Idk. Maybe it's flattering in some way? Or maybe looking for confirmation from an objective third party about something to do with yourself you think may be true? I am not going to think too deep about it. Who knows. You asked Yeah I did and you are right. But maybe there is a bit more to it. But yeah. |
~Lumminessa~ User ID: 70334001 United States 06/14/2016 10:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wow the temps in here sure changed. Where did everyone go? Hope everyone is doing well. Last Edited by ~Lumminessa~ on 06/14/2016 10:34 PM Easing the Burden of the Mystery ... “Men argue. Nature acts.” ~Voltaire ~Stella Maris~*~Nurture Nature~ Just a Taste of Some of My Art: [link to imgur.com] [link to imgur.com] [link to imgur.com] [link to imgur.com] [link to imgur.com] [link to imgur.com] [link to imgur.com] I am not out to compete, I hope we all make it. Thread: Wild Horse Shenanigans - Management Into Extinction - UPDATED |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2644086 United States 06/14/2016 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My best method is emotionless. I only watch stimuli and reactions. I end up with a list of hard facts that can be applied. Quoting: Facts>feelings That gives me a set of facts that at first I don't know why they work necessarily because I hadn't researched it from that angle purposely, that wasn't my objective, but they work just the same with or without my understanding why regardless. It's a means to strip a problem away from the distractions meant to cloak others from its basic building blocks. Basically I treat something like a thing. An alien. I apply stimuli and record reactions. I end up with a do and don't type list of information. Though I may still not know what I'm studying sometimes I know what it reacts to and in what ways. Quoting: Facts>feelings Yeah. I've figured out something on that line :-) On the other hand, you too are a piece of the architecture (in making) of this archetype - through the "experiments" you are conducting on the subjects related to it. You may say that even the observers are part of the architecture and i can't disagree with that :-) It's an interesting situation - with both sad and funny sides of it :-) Yes I imagine I can feel like the eye of sauron bearing down and disecting a target to some ppl sometimes. But that in itself is a stimuli with measurable reactions. :eyeofsauron: Hahaha :-)) You evil, you ! Eye of Sauron, aye ? On a more serious note, that sauron eye resembles so well to a mandorla (aureola). :yum: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71574211 Germany 06/14/2016 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2644086 United States 06/14/2016 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Facts>feelings You're a pervert? Lol. Idk. Maybe it's flattering in some way? Or maybe looking for confirmation from an objective third party about something to do with yourself you think may be true? I am not going to think too deep about it. Who knows. You asked Yeah I did and you are right. But maybe there is a bit more to it. But yeah. I just measure what moves ;) |
Almega User ID: 45593920 United States 06/14/2016 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2644086 United States 06/14/2016 10:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71574211 Germany 06/14/2016 10:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2644086 United States 06/14/2016 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
I_am_who_I_am (OP) User ID: 58352135 United States 06/14/2016 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i am who i am, both you and facts have stated on the mad world thread, that you are indeed satanists. as such, your motives can be viewed in the light that the nobody meme presents a threat to you both. you may be right! lol Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71574211 I do not post on that thread. Nor have I said that anywhere else. |
S__ User ID: 72167800 Russia 06/14/2016 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71574211 Germany 06/14/2016 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
I_am_who_I_am (OP) User ID: 58352135 United States 06/14/2016 10:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Observer Effect. "In science, the term observer effect refers to changes that the act of observation will make on a phenomenon being observed. This is often the result of instruments that, by necessity, alter the state of what they measure in some manner. " In Quantum Mechanics... "Once one has measured the system, one knows its current state; and this prevents it from being in one of its other states−−it has apparently decohered from them without prospects of future strong quantum interference. This means that the type of measurement one performs on the system affects the end-state of the system." One example... "An experimentally studied situation related to this is the quantum Zeno effect, in which a quantum state would decay if left alone, but does not decay because of its continuous observation." |
I_am_who_I_am (OP) User ID: 58352135 United States 06/14/2016 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2644086 United States 06/14/2016 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71574211 Germany 06/14/2016 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Quoting: I_am_who_I_am Observer Effect. "In science, the term observer effect refers to changes that the act of observation will make on a phenomenon being observed. This is often the result of instruments that, by necessity, alter the state of what they measure in some manner. " In Quantum Mechanics... "Once one has measured the system, one knows its current state; and this prevents it from being in one of its other states−−it has apparently decohered from them without prospects of future strong quantum interference. This means that the type of measurement one performs on the system affects the end-state of the system." One example... "An experimentally studied situation related to this is the quantum Zeno effect, in which a quantum state would decay if left alone, but does not decay because of its continuous observation." thinking about both of you! lol |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2644086 United States 06/14/2016 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Quoting: I_am_who_I_am Observer Effect. "In science, the term observer effect refers to changes that the act of observation will make on a phenomenon being observed. This is often the result of instruments that, by necessity, alter the state of what they measure in some manner. " In Quantum Mechanics... "Once one has measured the system, one knows its current state; and this prevents it from being in one of its other states−−it has apparently decohered from them without prospects of future strong quantum interference. This means that the type of measurement one performs on the system affects the end-state of the system." One example... "An experimentally studied situation related to this is the quantum Zeno effect, in which a quantum state would decay if left alone, but does not decay because of its continuous observation." Yerp |
NOBODY User ID: 72385505 Canada 06/16/2016 12:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72199474 Canada 06/16/2016 12:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Meh. I am well over 500x prouder of the other one. But maybe this has potential. UM's thread is quite a feat to live up to though. TBH i still don't understand the purpose of the thread - except for gathering attention from the already known participants to these kind of threads (And if that was the case, you should be proud of the achievement). I was annoyed at them all after reading the camo thread and just wanted to vent that they are not this dude, especially if they have had not a single obstacle in their lives. What percentage of them just have seen a few weird things, or think they know special information, or just feel special... and assume that means they are going to save the world? I dunno there really was no purpose besides me venting. You're right...funny weird things..I go now. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70346871 Moldova 06/16/2016 12:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let's pretend there is a man who is suppose to save us, rule us, judge us, unite us...or whatever else you might have in mind. Quoting: I_am_who_I_am Well there is MUCH more going on than he just happens to be chosen. So if you think you are him, just because of the weird things you have seen, you are wrong. This person would need to actually have a different character and greatness that would have had to be beaten into him. I mean BEATEN. By now, he would have had to go through more pain than most any one of you could ever fathom. And he will have even more pain to go through. This includes physical, psychological, emotional (and more) pain and torture. That is what makes someone great, if they can overcome and grow from it. It also makes them realize their own greatness. I am not just referring to a messed up childhood or something. No no no... the level of these experiences...you guys just have no clue. You would not want to wish this on yourself. No one, not even his female counterpart, will ever go through the level of pain he has, and also what he will have to. The respect EVERY single being in the entire Universe will have for him, when this is all said and done, will be unfathomable. The ones that observe him now, already have that awe. Do you really think that right now you are seen in such incredibly high regard right now for the ACTIONS you have taken in spite of the PAIN you have been put under? It is in a way disrespectful to try and claim to be someone who has been infinitely more bruised than your imagination could understand. And it is foolish of you. There are tons and tons of psych-ops being done to try and convince you all that you are him. You are being deluded by these controllers. If they care enough to do this to you personally, you might have a role to play soon...but you are not him. But many of you just have a power complex and have convinced yourself you are awesome enough to be chosen. This is WAY WAY WAY more complicated than just someone being chosen. This is earned. And stop using this stupid "Nobody" label. It is just a meme. Another retarded thread by the loser that goes by I am who I am, I.E coward to even admit he's an anonymous coward :) 1 million comedians out of work and he's trying to be funny. :)) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70346871 Moldova 06/16/2016 12:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Quoting: I_am_who_I_am Observer Effect. "In science, the term observer effect refers to changes that the act of observation will make on a phenomenon being observed. This is often the result of instruments that, by necessity, alter the state of what they measure in some manner. " In Quantum Mechanics... "Once one has measured the system, one knows its current state; and this prevents it from being in one of its other states−−it has apparently decohered from them without prospects of future strong quantum interference. This means that the type of measurement one performs on the system affects the end-state of the system." One example... "An experimentally studied situation related to this is the quantum Zeno effect, in which a quantum state would decay if left alone, but does not decay because of its continuous observation." Yerp Oh shut up kid you've no even a single idea about any quantum physics, nor does I am who I am. -_- woooow any physicist could tell. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71598638 United States 06/16/2016 12:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Quoting: I_am_who_I_am Observer Effect. "In science, the term observer effect refers to changes that the act of observation will make on a phenomenon being observed. This is often the result of instruments that, by necessity, alter the state of what they measure in some manner. " In Quantum Mechanics... "Once one has measured the system, one knows its current state; and this prevents it from being in one of its other states−−it has apparently decohered from them without prospects of future strong quantum interference. This means that the type of measurement one performs on the system affects the end-state of the system." One example... "An experimentally studied situation related to this is the quantum Zeno effect, in which a quantum state would decay if left alone, but does not decay because of its continuous observation." Yerp Oh shut up kid you've no even a single idea about any quantum physics, nor does I am who I am. -_- woooow any physicist could tell. That is a real thing you idiot. I don't doubt for one second you know jack shit about quantum anything. Stop proxy jumping to show your ignorance and stalk posters. Also: :obsessedwithme: |