When you hear "Australia hasn't had any mass shootings since 1996", it is a lie.

The sheep are biding there time. They will attack when the time is right,

most of them were depressed farmers..... Sad.

lol what brings you to this conclusion?

Are you new to GLP?

That's disrespectful to the people that have fought alongside american troops in every war.
You should show Aussies more respect you fucking prick.

FUCK YOU CUNT!

Another example of pencil-necked, gender confused, clipboard-popping control freaks making up shit as they go along.

Last Edited by everLearner on 06/16/2016 08:25 AM

Kangaroos! They like to jump when they don't need to.

I know you are. But what am I?

trollololololol

Our work here is done.

Australia is just a really big Seattle or Austin.

That ass licker Howard begged Bush to get Australia on board the killing machine.

the PM that ban the semi autos thinks (and the most people believe him) that banning semi autos reduced the suicide rate.
i guess lots of people needed two rounds to the head.

FIVE STARs

Great Post OP -

I would like to add to the conversation.

In addition to the LIE that there have been ZERO mass shootings since the gun ban I recently discovered this little fact everyone should know as well as what you have posted.

I recently brushed up on the Port Arthur massacre itself and discovered another LIE the US Politicians like to tell. That gun ownership reduction is the reason for their first lie of zero mass shootings since.

Australia has more guns than before the Port Arthur massacre!!, and at the same time crime levels are still dropping!!!

THIS IS A HUGE FACT EVERYONE NEEDS TO REMEMBER - Links below

[link to www.smh.com.au]

[link to www.abc.net.au]

The Aussie AC brigade is out in full force. Ban this filth.

for truth.

We're like herpes nothing will get rid of us.

lmao at the canadian arsefag getting upset.
fuck you, you left wing Hillary supporting jamrag.

Jamrag! Haha! That's a new one on me. I will include that in my insult reference.

At least we walk on the footpath.

But most of usa believe in the bible........ and over half think earth is 6000 years old

Last Edited by Kakarot_ on 06/16/2016 08:44 AM

shhhh. they think its australian... lolz

He didn't specify the average IQ in yankeeland, it's closer to 80 due to large population of naggers and beakers

I've got friends who are U.S. Marines and IQ100...
Pfft

The Earth is 6,000 Years Old.

It's a sad thing that many Christians have an appalling lack of biblical understanding, that at times enables our enemies to run rings around us. To take one example: You often see or read of mockers in the media saying words to the effect that: "The bible is inaccurate because it says that the earth is only 6,000 years old."

But the bible also says...2Pe 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

You can easily work out for yourself that if you multiply 360 days (lunar years) x 6,000 x 1,000 that you get a figure of well over 2 billion years. Which also leaves plenty of room for quite a few 1,000 year periods to pass as single days.

No doubt some carping evolutionist will start whingeing that "the bible is still inaccurate because the earth is 6 billion (or whatever) years old. And I've got two good answers to that one.

Firstly: Just because you have blind faith in (a) the inherent accuracy of their scientific instruments. (b) The true scientific integrity of those doing the laboratory work. (c) That they cannot be fooled by false readings and/or assumptions. Pleeeeeeeeze do not expect me to take your shaky assumptions at face value. I know for a fact that false science is being used to bamboozle everyone into believing what they say about 'global warming', so why should I give you the benefit of the doubt.

Secondly: Try and explain this one away. We are told in the story of creation that the earth was formed from the small stuff that was left over after the creation of the universe. Therefore it should be quite reasonable to expect that for instance one group of about 500 million cubic miles of rock that outcrops on the earth's surface is perhaps 6 billion or so years old. Another outcrop of perhaps 200 million cubic miles could be 3 or 4 billion years old. And so on.

To sum up. If the material that was used to make the earth was in existence before the earth was formed, then obviously it is older than the earth.

So if in the future you hear some idiot spouting off about "the bible being inaccurate because it says that the earth is only 6,000 years old," you can correct them.

Very interesting articles. The only issue with the Sydney Morning Herald piece is their mention of "no mass shootings since 1996".

Not saying they were 100 just saying you have a low bar there

If you include domestic violence as part of mass shooting then the number of mass shootings in america would rise a lot..... it is already at an average of 1 a day without including domestic violence aka family killings.