The US Navy just developed an answer to one of the biggest threats from Russia and China | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71395241 United States 06/19/2016 04:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And that's where the SeaRAM antiship cruise missile could potentially be a game changer. Building upon the already capable Phalanx close-in weapons system, a computer-controlled 20 mm gun system that automatically tracks and fires on incoming threats, the SeaRAM system simply replaces the gun with a rolling airframe missile launcher. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72312108 [link to www.businessinsider.com] Buhahaha... What you know about modern Russian missiles? Or may be about elderly soviet anti-ship missiles? Nothing, so if you know not write this ... Khow many armor can penetrate this SeaRAM missile? This missile can not penetrate missile armor total. You missile can not shot down elderly antiship missile "P-500" f.e. So 70mm armor is 70mm armore. Read about this missile [link to sovpl.forum24.ru] and think khow SeaRAM can shot down this elderly anti-sip missile f.e. Lol. Missile armor. That is an oxymoran and a half. Extra weight equals slower speed retard. 70mm is the size of the missile, like a hydra7. Not the amount of armor it has... Lololololololol. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72421358 Russia 06/19/2016 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And that's where the SeaRAM antiship cruise missile could potentially be a game changer. Building upon the already capable Phalanx close-in weapons system, a computer-controlled 20 mm gun system that automatically tracks and fires on incoming threats, the SeaRAM system simply replaces the gun with a rolling airframe missile launcher. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72312108 [link to www.businessinsider.com] Buhahaha... What you know about modern Russian missiles? Or may be about elderly soviet anti-ship missiles? Nothing, so if you know not write this ... Khow many armor can penetrate this SeaRAM missile? This missile can not penetrate missile armor total. You missile can not shot down elderly antiship missile "P-500" f.e. So 70mm armor is 70mm armore. Read about this missile [link to sovpl.forum24.ru] and think khow SeaRAM can shot down this elderly anti-sip missile f.e. Lol this tard and his Kremlin links crack me up. He doesn't even realize the Kremlin blocks the links to modern American tech so he is doing all this research on last generation American tech thinking he's in the the know and educated on the subject In Russia internet uses you. Lol this tard very stupid. Anyone know about modern US weapons? I know that no one. Last generation US weapons is elderly generation Russian weapons mainly. Hey tard - say how this fake SeaRAM missile can penetrate armor anti-ship missiles? F.e. elderly "P-500" missile. I wait. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71200287 United States 06/19/2016 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem is they'd need 10 of these running at once for just a single typical volley of an old granit etc. because they hunt in packs and come in from different directions and completely overwhelm any defensive armament. The window of interception is so small they simply can't handle it especially with the new ones that do mach 3+. Meanwhile there is a backfire bomber and a shore launched, and a sub doing the same thing at the same time... In China they have ones that fly in from orbit at something like mach 10 from straight above. A ship these days stands ZERO hope of any long term survival. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72421358 Russia 06/19/2016 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And that's where the SeaRAM antiship cruise missile could potentially be a game changer. Building upon the already capable Phalanx close-in weapons system, a computer-controlled 20 mm gun system that automatically tracks and fires on incoming threats, the SeaRAM system simply replaces the gun with a rolling airframe missile launcher. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72312108 [link to www.businessinsider.com] Buhahaha... What you know about modern Russian missiles? Or may be about elderly soviet anti-ship missiles? Nothing, so if you know not write this ... Khow many armor can penetrate this SeaRAM missile? This missile can not penetrate missile armor total. You missile can not shot down elderly antiship missile "P-500" f.e. So 70mm armor is 70mm armore. Read about this missile [link to sovpl.forum24.ru] and think khow SeaRAM can shot down this elderly anti-sip missile f.e. Lol. Missile armor. That is an oxymoran and a half. Extra weight equals slower speed retard. 70mm is the size of the missile, like a hydra7. Not the amount of armor it has... Lololololololol. Yes - heavy Soviet and Russian missiles have armor. Various missiles have various armor. From 20mm to 70mm. All heavy anti-ship missiles from "P-500" and newer. And "P-700" and "P-1000" and "Granit-2" have armor. And SeaRAM can not made nothing, so can not penetrate armor. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64803050 United States 06/19/2016 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And that's where the SeaRAM antiship cruise missile could potentially be a game changer. Building upon the already capable Phalanx close-in weapons system, a computer-controlled 20 mm gun system that automatically tracks and fires on incoming threats, the SeaRAM system simply replaces the gun with a rolling airframe missile launcher. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72312108 [link to www.businessinsider.com] Buhahaha... What you know about modern Russian missiles? Or may be about elderly soviet anti-ship missiles? Nothing, so if you know not write this ... Khow many armor can penetrate this SeaRAM missile? This missile can not penetrate missile armor total. You missile can not shot down elderly antiship missile "P-500" f.e. So 70mm armor is 70mm armore. Read about this missile [link to sovpl.forum24.ru] and think khow SeaRAM can shot down this elderly anti-sip missile f.e. Lol this tard and his Kremlin links crack me up. He doesn't even realize the Kremlin blocks the links to modern American tech so he is doing all this research on last generation American tech thinking he's in the the know and educated on the subject In Russia internet uses you. Lol this tard very stupid. Anyone know about modern US weapons? I know that no one. Last generation US weapons is elderly generation Russian weapons mainly. Hey tard - say how this fake SeaRAM missile can penetrate armor anti-ship missiles? F.e. elderly "P-500" missile. I wait. Lol this fucking dude is like a monkey with a keyboard. He doesn't even know what he is saying Don't worry Russia I'll just assume one of your village idiots wandered over here and that your not all this fucking clueless. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64803050 United States 06/19/2016 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And that's where the SeaRAM antiship cruise missile could potentially be a game changer. Building upon the already capable Phalanx close-in weapons system, a computer-controlled 20 mm gun system that automatically tracks and fires on incoming threats, the SeaRAM system simply replaces the gun with a rolling airframe missile launcher. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72312108 [link to www.businessinsider.com] Buhahaha... What you know about modern Russian missiles? Or may be about elderly soviet anti-ship missiles? Nothing, so if you know not write this ... Khow many armor can penetrate this SeaRAM missile? This missile can not penetrate missile armor total. You missile can not shot down elderly antiship missile "P-500" f.e. So 70mm armor is 70mm armore. Read about this missile [link to sovpl.forum24.ru] and think khow SeaRAM can shot down this elderly anti-sip missile f.e. Lol. Missile armor. That is an oxymoran and a half. Extra weight equals slower speed retard. 70mm is the size of the missile, like a hydra7. Not the amount of armor it has... Lololololololol. Yes - heavy Soviet and Russian missiles have armor. Various missiles have various armor. From 20mm to 70mm. All heavy anti-ship missiles from "P-500" and newer. And "P-700" and "P-1000" and "Granit-2" have armor. And SeaRAM can not made nothing, so can not penetrate armor. Bahahahaha |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71395241 United States 06/19/2016 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And that's where the SeaRAM antiship cruise missile could potentially be a game changer. Building upon the already capable Phalanx close-in weapons system, a computer-controlled 20 mm gun system that automatically tracks and fires on incoming threats, the SeaRAM system simply replaces the gun with a rolling airframe missile launcher. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72312108 [link to www.businessinsider.com] Buhahaha... What you know about modern Russian missiles? Or may be about elderly soviet anti-ship missiles? Nothing, so if you know not write this ... Khow many armor can penetrate this SeaRAM missile? This missile can not penetrate missile armor total. You missile can not shot down elderly antiship missile "P-500" f.e. So 70mm armor is 70mm armore. Read about this missile [link to sovpl.forum24.ru] and think khow SeaRAM can shot down this elderly anti-sip missile f.e. Lol this tard and his Kremlin links crack me up. He doesn't even realize the Kremlin blocks the links to modern American tech so he is doing all this research on last generation American tech thinking he's in the the know and educated on the subject In Russia internet uses you. Lol this tard very stupid. Anyone know about modern US weapons? I know that no one. Last generation US weapons is elderly generation Russian weapons mainly. Hey tard - say how this fake SeaRAM missile can penetrate armor anti-ship missiles? F.e. elderly "P-500" missile. I wait. Scroll up. Your talking about a 70mm missile which are shot down by the us, russia and even fucking estonian's. You don't know what your talking about at even a basic level. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71395241 United States 06/19/2016 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem is they'd need 10 of these running at once for just a single typical volley of an old granit etc. because they hunt in packs and come in from different directions and completely overwhelm any defensive armament. The window of interception is so small they simply can't handle it especially with the new ones that do mach 3+. Meanwhile there is a backfire bomber and a shore launched, and a sub doing the same thing at the same time... In China they have ones that fly in from orbit at something like mach 10 from straight above. A ship these days stands ZERO hope of any long term survival. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71200287 THAAD, made to counter granit. You can call them p-?00 or s-?00 but they are the same missiles with secondary differences. Like an m-16 vs ar-15. Betcha don't know the difference there either. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72421358 Russia 06/19/2016 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72421358 Buhahaha... What you know about modern Russian missiles? Or may be about elderly soviet anti-ship missiles? Nothing, so if you know not write this ... Khow many armor can penetrate this SeaRAM missile? This missile can not penetrate missile armor total. You missile can not shot down elderly antiship missile "P-500" f.e. So 70mm armor is 70mm armore. Read about this missile [link to sovpl.forum24.ru] and think khow SeaRAM can shot down this elderly anti-sip missile f.e. Lol this tard and his Kremlin links crack me up. He doesn't even realize the Kremlin blocks the links to modern American tech so he is doing all this research on last generation American tech thinking he's in the the know and educated on the subject In Russia internet uses you. Lol this tard very stupid. Anyone know about modern US weapons? I know that no one. Last generation US weapons is elderly generation Russian weapons mainly. Hey tard - say how this fake SeaRAM missile can penetrate armor anti-ship missiles? F.e. elderly "P-500" missile. I wait. Scroll up. Your talking about a 70mm missile which are shot down by the us, russia and even fucking estonian's. You don't know what your talking about at even a basic level. Tard - P-500 missile have 880mm airframe diametr. Inside warhead and control systems have 70mm armor. Parts plane airframe have 70mm armore like. I know many that know you. SeaRAM can not penetrate armor anti-ship missile total. Next - P-500 missile have spee 2600 km/h. How many time need missile fly in firing range SeaRAM? Few seconds only. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71451758 United States 06/19/2016 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72421358 Russia 06/19/2016 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem is they'd need 10 of these running at once for just a single typical volley of an old granit etc. because they hunt in packs and come in from different directions and completely overwhelm any defensive armament. The window of interception is so small they simply can't handle it especially with the new ones that do mach 3+. Meanwhile there is a backfire bomber and a shore launched, and a sub doing the same thing at the same time... In China they have ones that fly in from orbit at something like mach 10 from straight above. A ship these days stands ZERO hope of any long term survival. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71200287 THAAD, made to counter granit. You can call them p-?00 or s-?00 but they are the same missiles with secondary differences. Like an m-16 vs ar-15. Betcha don't know the difference there either. Granit anti-ship missiles now was not in Russian susbs total. It is elderly missile. Now all Granit missiles modernisation in Granit-2 variant. It is more deadly than before. In 2018 year would be first new submarine with Tsirkon missile. It is 6 mach speed.May be more - testing not ending yet. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72421358 Russia 06/19/2016 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hahaha... Gatling gun? Phalanx apparantly? Right? Firing range 2 km and less. Speed missile P-500 is 2600 km/h. How many time need missile for fly in 2 km? Well - ypu start fire and hit (impossible total, but f.e). You destroy homing system missile. In time destoy missile would be in 1 km from target ship. Missile can not missed to target. In few seconds target can not evading missile. Speed too high and range too small. Need understand this - US ships simple targets. Helpless targets and no more. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64803050 United States 06/19/2016 05:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem is they'd need 10 of these running at once for just a single typical volley of an old granit etc. because they hunt in packs and come in from different directions and completely overwhelm any defensive armament. The window of interception is so small they simply can't handle it especially with the new ones that do mach 3+. Meanwhile there is a backfire bomber and a shore launched, and a sub doing the same thing at the same time... In China they have ones that fly in from orbit at something like mach 10 from straight above. A ship these days stands ZERO hope of any long term survival. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71200287 THAAD, made to counter granit. You can call them p-?00 or s-?00 but they are the same missiles with secondary differences. Like an m-16 vs ar-15. Betcha don't know the difference there either. We're talking about ppl who accept Russia and China have a + mach3 missile with no proof, on hearsay alone. I'm not sure what they think propaganda sounds like or how it works but they don't know it when it sinks straight into their brains thats for sure. All they know is Russia said scary thing, no need proof, sound scary. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72421358 Russia 06/19/2016 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem is they'd need 10 of these running at once for just a single typical volley of an old granit etc. because they hunt in packs and come in from different directions and completely overwhelm any defensive armament. The window of interception is so small they simply can't handle it especially with the new ones that do mach 3+. Meanwhile there is a backfire bomber and a shore launched, and a sub doing the same thing at the same time... In China they have ones that fly in from orbit at something like mach 10 from straight above. A ship these days stands ZERO hope of any long term survival. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71200287 THAAD, made to counter granit. You can call them p-?00 or s-?00 but they are the same missiles with secondary differences. Like an m-16 vs ar-15. Betcha don't know the difference there either. We're talking about ppl who accept Russia and China have a + mach3 missile with no proof, on hearsay alone. I'm not sure what they think propaganda sounds like or how it works but they don't know it when it sinks straight into their brains thats for sure. All they know is Russia said scary thing, no need proof, sound scary. Tard - Google in help for you. Search Sandbox missile - it is our P-500 missile. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64803050 United States 06/19/2016 05:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I want everyone to think about an armored missile that could get hit by that fucking SeaRAM and just keep flying like nothing happened. You see it? A god damned tank that does mach 3 in the water? That doesn't go off when hit with a missile? Lol. Someone tell me you see that as plausible. Please? Imagine the the thrust requirements? Is it nuke powered too lol? Jesus as some point you have to engage common sense and realize how full of shit Russia is. This is the stuff they tell Hungary and Georgia and the ukraine because they know those little countries are so afraid they'll believe it. They are trying the same thing on a modern nation with the world's most advanced military ffs. We're not guessing. We know what is possible and what isnt. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64803050 United States 06/19/2016 05:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem is they'd need 10 of these running at once for just a single typical volley of an old granit etc. because they hunt in packs and come in from different directions and completely overwhelm any defensive armament. The window of interception is so small they simply can't handle it especially with the new ones that do mach 3+. Meanwhile there is a backfire bomber and a shore launched, and a sub doing the same thing at the same time... In China they have ones that fly in from orbit at something like mach 10 from straight above. A ship these days stands ZERO hope of any long term survival. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71200287 THAAD, made to counter granit. You can call them p-?00 or s-?00 but they are the same missiles with secondary differences. Like an m-16 vs ar-15. Betcha don't know the difference there either. We're talking about ppl who accept Russia and China have a + mach3 missile with no proof, on hearsay alone. I'm not sure what they think propaganda sounds like or how it works but they don't know it when it sinks straight into their brains thats for sure. All they know is Russia said scary thing, no need proof, sound scary. Tard - Google in help for you. Search Sandbox missile - it is our P-500 missile. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72412468 United Kingdom 06/19/2016 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72412468 United Kingdom 06/19/2016 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71065539 United States 06/19/2016 05:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | developed by the same ass clowns that made f22 f35 jk |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64803050 United States 06/19/2016 05:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lmfao have you watched all that video , so the RAM struggles to hit a boat going ten mph and yet USA thinks it's an answer to Russian missles traveling 2000 plus , lmfao you need to go back to the drawing board It nailed the "boat" repeadedly you dumb ass. That thing is designed for target practice. If there would have been men on that they would be dead. If that had been a real boat instead of almost solid target designed for practice it would have disabled it or sunk it. All Those Close CALLS Were hits. Do you have any idea how many bullets that thing shoots? If there is bullet spray on both sides it nailed the boat in between. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72421358 Russia 06/19/2016 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I want everyone to think about an armored missile that could get hit by that fucking SeaRAM and just keep flying like nothing happened. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64803050 You see it? A god damned tank that does mach 3 in the water? That doesn't go off when hit with a missile? Lol. Someone tell me you see that as plausible. Please? Imagine the the thrust requirements? Is it nuke powered too lol? Jesus as some point you have to engage common sense and realize how full of shit Russia is. This is the stuff they tell Hungary and Georgia and the ukraine because they know those little countries are so afraid they'll believe it. They are trying the same thing on a modern nation with the world's most advanced military ffs. We're not guessing. We know what is possible and what isnt. Unfortuntly in soviet navy was incident when P-120 missile himself targeting our missile corvette Nanuchka class. Corvett made hit in P-120 from SAM SA-N-4. 2 missiles Osa can hit P-120. Missile continue incoming to target. After it ship start firing from AK-725 - from 8 to 10 shell hits to missile. 57mm shell. Result - missile hit corvette and ship sunk. This missile not have armor total. SeaRAM in 3 time weak than Osa missile (SA-N-4). So heavy anti-ship missile can not see hit (if can) US SeaRAM missile. During 1998 year in Northern fleet was training firing aganst P-500 missile. S-300F SAM system - 1 missile - hit. P-500 continue fly. Osa-MA SAM system - 2 missile - 2 hits. P-500 continue fly more. AK-130 - this 130mm twin gun - shells exploding near missile - missile continue fly. Shore base say, that missile answer and translate information from to shore. AK-630 (2 battaries - 4x6 30mm guns) - all hit - missile continue fly and fly above Kirov. How can SeaRAM shot down this missile? It is impossible total. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64803050 United States 06/19/2016 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lmfao have you watched all that video , so the RAM struggles to hit a boat going ten mph and yet USA thinks it's an answer to Russian missles traveling 2000 plus , lmfao you need to go back to the drawing board The f22 is the king of the skies. Russia can't even make one you idiot. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64803050 United States 06/19/2016 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I want everyone to think about an armored missile that could get hit by that fucking SeaRAM and just keep flying like nothing happened. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64803050 You see it? A god damned tank that does mach 3 in the water? That doesn't go off when hit with a missile? Lol. Someone tell me you see that as plausible. Please? Imagine the the thrust requirements? Is it nuke powered too lol? Jesus as some point you have to engage common sense and realize how full of shit Russia is. This is the stuff they tell Hungary and Georgia and the ukraine because they know those little countries are so afraid they'll believe it. They are trying the same thing on a modern nation with the world's most advanced military ffs. We're not guessing. We know what is possible and what isnt. Unfortuntly in soviet navy was incident when P-120 missile himself targeting our missile corvette Nanuchka class. Corvett made hit in P-120 from SAM SA-N-4. 2 missiles Osa can hit P-120. Missile continue incoming to target. After it ship start firing from AK-725 - from 8 to 10 shell hits to missile. 57mm shell. Result - missile hit corvette and ship sunk. This missile not have armor total. SeaRAM in 3 time weak than Osa missile (SA-N-4). So heavy anti-ship missile can not see hit (if can) US SeaRAM missile. During 1998 year in Northern fleet was training firing aganst P-500 missile. S-300F SAM system - 1 missile - hit. P-500 continue fly. Osa-MA SAM system - 2 missile - 2 hits. P-500 continue fly more. AK-130 - this 130mm twin gun - shells exploding near missile - missile continue fly. Shore base say, that missile answer and translate information from to shore. AK-630 (2 battaries - 4x6 30mm guns) - all hit - missile continue fly and fly above Kirov. How can SeaRAM shot down this missile? It is impossible total. do you believe your own bullshit? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72421358 Russia 06/19/2016 05:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I want everyone to think about an armored missile that could get hit by that fucking SeaRAM and just keep flying like nothing happened. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64803050 You see it? A god damned tank that does mach 3 in the water? That doesn't go off when hit with a missile? Lol. Someone tell me you see that as plausible. Please? Imagine the the thrust requirements? Is it nuke powered too lol? Jesus as some point you have to engage common sense and realize how full of shit Russia is. This is the stuff they tell Hungary and Georgia and the ukraine because they know those little countries are so afraid they'll believe it. They are trying the same thing on a modern nation with the world's most advanced military ffs. We're not guessing. We know what is possible and what isnt. Unfortuntly in soviet navy was incident when P-120 missile himself targeting our missile corvette Nanuchka class. Corvett made hit in P-120 from SAM SA-N-4. 2 missiles Osa can hit P-120. Missile continue incoming to target. After it ship start firing from AK-725 - from 8 to 10 shell hits to missile. 57mm shell. Result - missile hit corvette and ship sunk. This missile not have armor total. SeaRAM in 3 time weak than Osa missile (SA-N-4). So heavy anti-ship missile can not see hit (if can) US SeaRAM missile. During 1998 year in Northern fleet was training firing aganst P-500 missile. S-300F SAM system - 1 missile - hit. P-500 continue fly. Osa-MA SAM system - 2 missile - 2 hits. P-500 continue fly more. AK-130 - this 130mm twin gun - shells exploding near missile - missile continue fly. Shore base say, that missile answer and translate information from to shore. AK-630 (2 battaries - 4x6 30mm guns) - all hit - missile continue fly and fly above Kirov. How can SeaRAM shot down this missile? It is impossible total. do you believe your own bullshit? It is two real facts only. Google in help about sinking Nanuchka class corvette. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64803050 United States 06/19/2016 05:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I want everyone to think about an armored missile that could get hit by that fucking SeaRAM and just keep flying like nothing happened. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64803050 You see it? A god damned tank that does mach 3 in the water? That doesn't go off when hit with a missile? Lol. Someone tell me you see that as plausible. Please? Imagine the the thrust requirements? Is it nuke powered too lol? Jesus as some point you have to engage common sense and realize how full of shit Russia is. This is the stuff they tell Hungary and Georgia and the ukraine because they know those little countries are so afraid they'll believe it. They are trying the same thing on a modern nation with the world's most advanced military ffs. We're not guessing. We know what is possible and what isnt. Unfortuntly in soviet navy was incident when P-120 missile himself targeting our missile corvette Nanuchka class. Corvett made hit in P-120 from SAM SA-N-4. 2 missiles Osa can hit P-120. Missile continue incoming to target. After it ship start firing from AK-725 - from 8 to 10 shell hits to missile. 57mm shell. Result - missile hit corvette and ship sunk. This missile not have armor total. SeaRAM in 3 time weak than Osa missile (SA-N-4). So heavy anti-ship missile can not see hit (if can) US SeaRAM missile. During 1998 year in Northern fleet was training firing aganst P-500 missile. S-300F SAM system - 1 missile - hit. P-500 continue fly. Osa-MA SAM system - 2 missile - 2 hits. P-500 continue fly more. AK-130 - this 130mm twin gun - shells exploding near missile - missile continue fly. Shore base say, that missile answer and translate information from to shore. AK-630 (2 battaries - 4x6 30mm guns) - all hit - missile continue fly and fly above Kirov. How can SeaRAM shot down this missile? It is impossible total. do you believe your own bullshit? It is two real facts only. Google in help about sinking Nanuchka class corvette. All Google will tell me is Russia saw what you are claiming and no one else did. Like all the rest of Russias PROOF. Look you're playing with the big boys here. We can do math too. You got shit and you know it. And so do we. If you had it you would show it and not talk about it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71395241 United States 06/19/2016 05:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64803050 Lol this tard and his Kremlin links crack me up. He doesn't even realize the Kremlin blocks the links to modern American tech so he is doing all this research on last generation American tech thinking he's in the the know and educated on the subject In Russia internet uses you. Lol this tard very stupid. Anyone know about modern US weapons? I know that no one. Last generation US weapons is elderly generation Russian weapons mainly. Hey tard - say how this fake SeaRAM missile can penetrate armor anti-ship missiles? F.e. elderly "P-500" missile. I wait. Scroll up. Your talking about a 70mm missile which are shot down by the us, russia and even fucking estonian's. You don't know what your talking about at even a basic level. Tard - P-500 missile have 880mm airframe diametr. Inside warhead and control systems have 70mm armor. Parts plane airframe have 70mm armore like. I know many that know you. SeaRAM can not penetrate armor anti-ship missile total. Next - P-500 missile have spee 2600 km/h. How many time need missile fly in firing range SeaRAM? Few seconds only. Meh, was supposed to be "70mm armored core missile which are shot down by the us, russia, and even fucking estonian's." So if speed is the killer tell me how slow ass patriots knock shit with 100mm armored cores all the time? When something is coming at you and you detect better than 250 miles away and automated ststems engage to counter. That is minutes not seconds. I really simplify it for you. You've got a car with an armored cab and engine that can go as fast as you'd like. You try to run me over and I only have a few seconds to react, but I shoot your tires (maneuvering surfaces in missile talk) but can't penetrate your core... what are the chances you are still going to be able to hit me or drive toward the same area? Small. It's not always about blowing up the target, but rendering it inert or ineffective. Principle behind missile defense. Hence the minimum of three layer missile defense security. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72421358 Russia 06/19/2016 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72421358 Unfortuntly in soviet navy was incident when P-120 missile himself targeting our missile corvette Nanuchka class. Corvett made hit in P-120 from SAM SA-N-4. 2 missiles Osa can hit P-120. Missile continue incoming to target. After it ship start firing from AK-725 - from 8 to 10 shell hits to missile. 57mm shell. Result - missile hit corvette and ship sunk. This missile not have armor total. SeaRAM in 3 time weak than Osa missile (SA-N-4). So heavy anti-ship missile can not see hit (if can) US SeaRAM missile. During 1998 year in Northern fleet was training firing aganst P-500 missile. S-300F SAM system - 1 missile - hit. P-500 continue fly. Osa-MA SAM system - 2 missile - 2 hits. P-500 continue fly more. AK-130 - this 130mm twin gun - shells exploding near missile - missile continue fly. Shore base say, that missile answer and translate information from to shore. AK-630 (2 battaries - 4x6 30mm guns) - all hit - missile continue fly and fly above Kirov. How can SeaRAM shot down this missile? It is impossible total. do you believe your own bullshit? It is two real facts only. Google in help about sinking Nanuchka class corvette. All Google will tell me is Russia saw what you are claiming and no one else did. Like all the rest of Russias PROOF. Look you're playing with the big boys here. We can do math too. You got shit and you know it. And so do we. If you had it you would show it and not talk about it. Link [link to masterok.livejournal.com] with foto. Sorry, but I forget missile in this episode. And it was not P-120, but P-15 (SS-N-2) only. In foto you can see that SAM system and AK-725 training. About training fire against P-500 - I himself say with crew members from cruiser Kirov class in Severomorsk after return ship to base. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72412468 United Kingdom 06/19/2016 05:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lmfao have you watched all that video , so the RAM struggles to hit a boat going ten mph and yet USA thinks it's an answer to Russian missles traveling 2000 plus , lmfao you need to go back to the drawing board It nailed the "boat" repeadedly you dumb ass. That thing is designed for target practice. If there would have been men on that they would be dead. If that had been a real boat instead of almost solid target designed for practice it would have disabled it or sunk it. All Those Close CALLS Were hits. Do you have any idea how many bullets that thing shoots? If there is bullet spray on both sides it nailed the boat in between. Lol did it bollocks , pile of shit can't even hit an inflatable dingy with a 200 dollar engine , yet you think it's gona take a missle doing 2000 mph plus , fucking lunatics man .. You got to think out the box , the hung Ho attitude clearly isn't working , |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72421358 Russia 06/19/2016 05:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72421358 Lol this tard very stupid. Anyone know about modern US weapons? I know that no one. Last generation US weapons is elderly generation Russian weapons mainly. Hey tard - say how this fake SeaRAM missile can penetrate armor anti-ship missiles? F.e. elderly "P-500" missile. I wait. Scroll up. Your talking about a 70mm missile which are shot down by the us, russia and even fucking estonian's. You don't know what your talking about at even a basic level. Tard - P-500 missile have 880mm airframe diametr. Inside warhead and control systems have 70mm armor. Parts plane airframe have 70mm armore like. I know many that know you. SeaRAM can not penetrate armor anti-ship missile total. Next - P-500 missile have spee 2600 km/h. How many time need missile fly in firing range SeaRAM? Few seconds only. Meh, was supposed to be "70mm armored core missile which are shot down by the us, russia, and even fucking estonian's." So if speed is the killer tell me how slow ass patriots knock shit with 100mm armored cores all the time? When something is coming at you and you detect better than 250 miles away and automated ststems engage to counter. That is minutes not seconds. I really simplify it for you. You've got a car with an armored cab and engine that can go as fast as you'd like. You try to run me over and I only have a few seconds to react, but I shoot your tires (maneuvering surfaces in missile talk) but can't penetrate your core... what are the chances you are still going to be able to hit me or drive toward the same area? Small. It's not always about blowing up the target, but rendering it inert or ineffective. Principle behind missile defense. Hence the minimum of three layer missile defense security. Missile homing system have armor like, but weak. And 20-30mm AP shells can penetrate armor homing system. And only. If S-300F missile explosion near missile homing sysytem not damage total. Need point hit in missile homing system. And this I write about elderly anti-ship missile P-500, what now you can see in museum only. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64803050 United States 06/19/2016 05:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lmfao have you watched all that video , so the RAM struggles to hit a boat going ten mph and yet USA thinks it's an answer to Russian missles traveling 2000 plus , lmfao you need to go back to the drawing board It nailed the "boat" repeadedly you dumb ass. That thing is designed for target practice. If there would have been men on that they would be dead. If that had been a real boat instead of almost solid target designed for practice it would have disabled it or sunk it. All Those Close CALLS Were hits. Do you have any idea how many bullets that thing shoots? If there is bullet spray on both sides it nailed the boat in between. Lol did it bollocks , pile of shit can't even hit an inflatable dingy with a 200 dollar engine , yet you think it's gona take a missle doing 2000 mph plus , fucking lunatics man .. You got to think out the box , the hung Ho attitude clearly isn't working , Yeah if I was you I would claim it wasnt exactly what it was too lol. What choice do you have? That gun shredded the target repeadedly. Funny thing about the truth. It completely fucks up silly little desperate lies. Like magic. Now that I've told ppl what that target boat was and what it's designed for they'll go back and look and understand what they are seeing this time. A remote controlled target designed to take fire for target practice. Because I think even our dumbest here understand that if the gun was really missing it's target it wouldn't have been allowed in the video. |