So, now it's ok for our police to use bombs..

relax it was a pesticide "bomb" to kill an effin cock roach !!! they use dem evry day in the projects !!!! !! a sulfur bomb !!

TV? I thought you never believe what's said on TV (mainstream media)?

Robocop or Rambo? Either way the guy was screwed

I guess it all depends on what bullshit story the man in the TV box is selling today.

The guy tells them he has the building wired. If the Chief sent in SWAT and got them killed trying to capture him alive he would have been hung.

Right?!

I was watching it live. They had already been showing a pic of one guy walking with a gun, which is LEGAL, as being a suspect. For hours, they showed this man. Then his brother and another guy found a TV crew and said that's my brother, he's at home. And he had turned in his weapon to cops already, those 3 can identify the cop the gun went to.

Suddenly, after hours of saying multiple snipers on top of buildings, it goes to a lone gunman. I call BULLSHIT. And they showed video of other people on the ground handcuffed. Not that I believe all media but I'm putting it out there in case others don't know.

I think you'll find that the government can already do and justify "whatever the hell they want."

I perceive humans as animals, and I have no quarrels with "putting down" animals which have attacked humans, even if the offending animal is a human themselves. I however am far more pragmatic than misanthropic, much less "patriotic" or anything of the sort. I'm neither satisfied nor dissatisfied that they've killed him. Instead, I merely recognize that he apparently attacked police, and they responded in kind. One who kills another is certainly "fair game." He chose to become a belligerent, presumably.

During the height of the Iraq and Afghan wars, it interested me how American soldiers would be angry with their opponents in response to them killing their fellow American soldiers. Seems to me that if you invade another country, you should probably expect the combatants of that country to attempt to kill you.

Precedence is irrelevant. One doesn't require precedence to gain precedence, and as such precedence is simply unnecessary. As remarked earlier, the government may do whatever it wishes.

I don't believe that a bomb is necessary for the government to destroy or obscure evidence. Instead, the bomb attracts attention.

When fighting a war, superiority is always preferred, and always sought. An inevitability. The alternative is less firepower and defense leading to enforcement employment slumps, leading to less manpower and effectiveness, concluding with instability and potential nullification of the current controllers. Yes, the bomb bots are only the next step, and far from the last. The police of today is in many ways more powerful than the military of decades past. The police of tomorrow will be more powerful than the military of today.

Last Edited by Navarro on 07/09/2016 12:49 PM

So your Fifth Amendment Rights and your Second Amendment right are fairly null and void at this point. Knock out gas

could have been loaded onto that robot just as easily, still guaranteeing his trial and justice to be served.



What is the Second Amendment intended for again? We all seem to have this idea that it was intended to protect us

from a tyrannical government, the same government that is being given a pass by it's citizens to kill with BOMBS ON

AMERICAN SOIL. They might as well come and take up everyone's firearms right now, today as your arms will not

stand up to drone bombs PERIOD. I am not believing what I am seeing here.

How did one guy manage to shoot ten cops?

.

OP has a point.

In all of police standoffs I've ever heard of, I've never
heard of a BOMB being used to incapacitate a suspect.

Tear gas, smoke granades, even percussion granades -- but not a "BOMB".

.

Last Edited by Joe Camel on 07/09/2016 12:49 PM

Knockout gas? You seriously don't believe he didn't bring a gas mask? Go silent after the gas and wait to detonate a bomb when SWAT entered the building? Get real.

He was high up and picked them off as they ran to the fire to give aid to the fallen and to protect the citizens. It was pretty easy from his vantage point

Only there's no indication that he ever said that. Link?

I hope they come and take your shit first btw.

He was was on the ground shooting at least one point blank. He wasn't alone.

Yet, had the police simply killed him with a bullet we wouldn't even be having the discussion. However, they didn't kill him with a bullet, they killed him with a bomb, which is exotic, and so we are indeed having this discussion. In any case, be it death by bullet or death by bomb, it would have either way been, death. The method is unique, but the result is not.

I agree 100%
He became an enemy combatant with the first shot. The police showed mercy in trying to negotiate with him for 3 hours and choose the "safest" way to stop him. Police are here to Protect and Serve, not to commit suicide.

There's no guarantee that he possessed a gas mask. I'm fairly certain that possession of a gas mask isn't a prerequisite for killing police. I assure you that more people have killed police without a gas mask than have killed with a gas mask. Also, not everyone is susceptible to police chemical agents. Some are effectively immune to agents as pepper spray or tear gas.

Police don't give their lives, they are stolen.

And you are still the fuckin dimwhitt motherfucker you were yesterday, so?

LOL anything and everything is possible. Look at the neck wagging its shithead above you we're dealing with.

Every time one puts on a uniform which identifies them as the enemy of another, they choose to risk their lives. They willfully assume the role of another man's target. Their lives are then indeed "given" rather than "stolen." It's not logical to agree to play the game then think the situation unfair simply because you lost.

The shooter did far more to hurt the Black cause than anyone in decades. Lawful black people are ashamed of what he did. He is a complete loser except to the lowest scum.

How many fuckin times do you dumb bastards need to be corrected about the difference between Law enforcement and Color of Law enforcement....you're one stupid son of a bitch. Cops are Americas enemy, all wearing military rank and working for a foreign corporation....are you one of them dumbass? Nod your stupid head.

What kind of rifle was he using?

Not only did the police use a bomb, this is the first documented use of a ground robot to kill a perp, that I am aware of. Has anyone said "Terminator" yet?

Enemy of who?

Well, the result is we got people earnestly defending the use of a bomb by the police. Was it a "bad guy" the blew up. Well, duh. Bombing a bus of girl scouts wouldn't be bringing the cheers.

Blow up a bad guy and everybody talks about how they were right. Next time, the bad guy is on your team, maybe one of them "crazy" patriot types. Just as many people will be defending that, too. And, hey, bombing people is not part of the landscape.

The Boston lockdown was a beta. I thought that the instant I saw the first clip. Now, lockdowns are accepted as routine in any shooting and protesters of them are deemed assholes who are out of step with reality.

Cops: Hey shooter. We have given you 3 hours to surrender. Times up. Surrender now or we will have to kill you.

Shooter: Come get me Coppers.

BOOM

End of story

I disagree. It seems to me that Obama has perpetrated the greatest harm to the black cause in this millennia. I speculate that racial tension was at an all-time low in America prior to Obama's presidential candidacy. Obama then managed to set-back race relations at least a decade in my estimation. Obama is the greatest divider America has seen since Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis. The actions of the man you speak of are simply the result of Obama's effects.