Scarecrow in Wizard of Oz Has a Gun? Mandela Effect? Or..."He Always Had a Gun!"

Same here.

It was filmed in technicolor. Cognitive dissonance my ass. Now I'm out.

Because it wasn’t in the final cut of the movie.

Get a DVD with the story of the films making in the extras. You will see the scene there. As far as I know the movie has only one final version and that is the one that has been seen since the beginning.

Please for the love of all that is holy google "images for credits of wizard of oz". Technicolor is a filming process not a colorizing process. Why dudnt turner colorized the whole mfer if he colorized it and left the first 15 black and white....?????? Duhhhhh

FORREST GUMP:

Why would he use 'was' in the past tense of talking about a box of chocolates? Just to then go on and say that 'you never know what you're going to GET'. Get, not 'got'. That doesn't even make sense.

It was 'is'. Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're going to get.

I don't have an argument with the film being shot in technicolor, but it was also shot in black and white... in the same movie. The beginning of the film everything was black and white until Dorothy arrives in Oz.

Do you disagree?

(Fluffy Pancakes' other half)

I watched the clip and I don't remember the Tin Man carrying two 'weapons'. He only had an ax as I recall. In the clip he is carrying what looks to be a large wrench too!

this ^^^^. I noticed that right off the bat. I don't recall him carrying a vastly oversized pipe wrench.....just an ax, as he was a woodsman.

what was he supposed to do with it, fix the plumbing the wicked witch's castle?

Okay, so why do so many oldtimers remember the "deleted" scenes being in the movie? I see them saying "Yes, Scarecrow always had a gun." However, that's not how I remember it at all. The first time I saw it was in 1969 and I have seen it at least 100 times over the years. Scarecrow never had a gun.

That's the weird part.

(OP's other half)

So you are saying this scene was deleted, and there is only one movie version for home. Correct?

So, does the home version have the scene with the Scarecrow with a gun?

I don't have an argument with the film being shot in technicolor, but it was also shot in black and white... in the same movie. The beginning of the film everything was black and white until Dorothy arrives in Oz.

Do you disagree?

(Fluffy Pancakes' other half)

Mama always said (past tense) that life was (same tense) like a box of chocolates. You never know what your gonna get.

If I only had a nug...

Ive watched this when I was child, watched with my kids and grand kids and never saw a gun. He always only had an ax.

Till she arrives in munchkin land, not Oz. Then color.

I don't remember the scarecrow having a gun, but I'm not the biggest fan of Wizard of Oz. Is that the only scene he has it in? Does he pick it up along the movie somewhere? I remember them using an oil tin to lube up the tin man, does it resemble the oil tin at all? Very bizarre.

OP is 54 lol like most mandelians , mandella effect shows how in modern times you can make fools out of people faster than before with internet , you can't debunk mandela effect because you are from other timeline lmao

Nobody Effect

Okay. So then we have Phenom who said the VHS copy she watched has NO GUN, no wrench and no insecticide sprayer. She posted pics of the scene, and that is exactly what I, and many others, recall of the movie.

I could readily believe the scene in question was a deleted scene, but NOW it looks like the deleted scene is in the movie. Additionally, many people are reporting that the scene in question WAS ALWAYS in the movie. But Phenom's VHS shows no gun, wrench, or sprayer.

SO, if it is now in the dvd's of the movie, not in the one working VHS we have reported and documented here, is this a ME?

Seems like sloppy enough changes to be one, imo.

[link to home.earthlink.net]

All very interesting

It isn't time travel and it isn't magic.

It's actually a different concept and explains why some remember certain things and others do not.

Think of it as an episode of Fringe...if you ever watched it...where two earths are coming together and some of the stuff from one earth crosses over to other earth.

Instead of stuff, it's people. But no one really remembers it happening physically, even though a few years back many people were being treated for dizziness, vertigo and tinnitus...most people won't remember that, but I do, because I work in the medical industry. We had a lot of cases.

Now what if, someone or something messed with the quantum field or the magnetic field or created a tear in the fabric...pulling us together.

But only ONE earth won out.

So now we have people who died on one earth, alive. Hence, the Mandela Effect.

But take it one step further: since we are now on your earth, those with alternate memories would have ONLY their memories as proof. THIS EARTH won the pull...so it would be logical that books/films/recorded history would mirror what YOU remember because it is ultimately YOUR reality.

Which is why we can't explain it to anyone not being affected. We can only tell you that stuff is changing...and you laugh and call a great deal of people tards.

But the truth is, things are different. And it isn't merely memory slips.