Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,439 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 614,517
Pageviews Today: 798,112Threads Today: 187Posts Today: 2,719
05:43 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE

 
THEY'RE HERE!!!!
User ID: 172434
United States
01/01/2007 03:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
[link to www.chicagotribune.com]

In the sky! A bird? A plane? A ... UFO?
Video: UFO over O'Hare Airport?

Published January 1, 2007

It sounds like a tired joke--but a group of airline employees insist they are in earnest, and they are upset that neither their bosses nor the government will take them seriously.

A flying saucerlike object hovered low over O'Hare International Airport for several minutes before bolting through thick clouds with such intense energy that it left an eerie hole in overcast skies, said some United Airlines employees who observed the phenomenon.

Was it an alien spaceship? A weather balloon lost in the airspace over the world's second-busiest airport? A top-secret military craft? Or simply a reflection from lights that played a trick on the eyes?

Officials at United professed no knowledge of the Nov. 7 event--which was reported to the airline by as many as a dozen of its own workers--when the Tribune started asking questions recently. But the Federal Aviation Administration said its air traffic control tower at O'Hare did receive a call from a United supervisor asking if controllers had spotted a mysterious elliptical-shaped craft sitting motionless over Concourse C of the United terminal.

No controllers saw the object, and a preliminary check of radar found nothing out of the ordinary, FAA spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory said.

The FAA is not conducting a further investigation, Cory said. The theory is the sighting was caused by a "weather phenomenon," she said.

The UFO report has sparked some chuckles among controllers in O'Hare tower.

"To fly 7 million light years to O'Hare and then have to turn around and go home because your gate was occupied is simply unacceptable," said O'Hare controller and union official Craig Burzych.

Some of the witnesses, interviewed by the Tribune, said they are upset that neither the government nor the airline is probing the incident.

Whatever the object was, it could have interfered with O'Hare's radar and other equipment, and even created a collision risk, they said.

The Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (the term that extraterrestrial-watchers nowadays prefer over Unidentified Flying Object) was first seen by a United ramp worker who was directing back a United plane at Gate C17, according to an account the worker provided to the National UFO Reporting Center.

The sighting occurred during daylight, about 4:30 p.m., just before sunset.

All the witnesses said the object was dark gray and well defined in the overcast skies. They said the craft, estimated by different accounts to be 6 feet to 24 feet in diameter, did not display any lights.

Some said it looked like a rotating Frisbee, while others said it did not appear to be spinning. All agreed the object made no noise and it was at a fixed position in the sky, just below the 1,900-foot cloud deck, until shooting off into the clouds.

Witnesses shaken by sighting

"I tend to be scientific by nature, and I don't understand why aliens would hover over a busy airport," said a United mechanic who was in the cockpit of a Boeing 777 that he was taxiing to a maintenance hangar when he observed the metallic-looking object above Gate C17.

"But I know that what I saw and what a lot of other people saw stood out very clearly, and it definitely was not an [Earth] aircraft," the mechanic said.

One United employee appeared emotionally shaken by the sighting and "experienced some religious issues" over it, one co-worker said.

A United manager said he ran outside his office in Concourse B after hearing the report about the sighting on an internal airline radio frequency.

"I stood outside in the gate area not knowing what to think, just trying to figure out what it was," he said. "I knew no one would make a false call like that. But if somebody was bouncing a weather balloon or something else over O'Hare, we had to stop it because it was in very close proximity to our flight operations."

Some joke, others research

The databases of various UFO-watching groups are full of accounts filed by pilots about sightings of unknown aircraft and anomalies that affected navigational equipment onboard planes.

Whether any of the UFO incidents are real or merely the result of individual perceptions, some experts say the events pose a potential safety risk to pilots and their passengers.

"There have been documented cases where safety appears to have been implicated, and more and more we are coming to the point of view that we are dealing with an intelligent phenomenon," said Richard Haines, science director at the National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena, a private agency.

"We must be proactive before an aircraft goes down," said Haines, a former chief of the Space Human Factors Office at NASA's Ames Research Center.

Haines is investigating the O'Hare incident. He said he has determined that no weather balloons were launched in the vicinity of O'Hare on Nov. 7.

"It's absurd that the military would be conducting aerial test flights" near the airport, Haines said.

All the witnesses to the O'Hare event, who included at least several pilots, said they are certain based on the disc's appearance and flight characteristics that it was not an airplane, helicopter, weather balloon or any other craft known to man.

United denies UFO report

They're not sure what was hanging out for several minutes in the restricted airspace, but they are upset that no one in power has taken the matter seriously.

A United spokeswoman said there is no record of the UFO report. She said United officials do not recall discussion of any such incident.

"There's nothing in the duty manager log, which is used to report unusual incidents," said United spokeswoman Megan McCarthy. "I checked around. There's no record of anything."

The pilots of the United plane being directed back from Gate C17 also were notified by United personnel of the sighting, and one of the pilots reportedly opened a windscreen in the cockpit to get a better view of the object estimated to be hovering 1,500 feet above the ground.

The object was seen to suddenly accelerate straight up through the solid overcast skies, which the FAA reported had 1,900-foot cloud ceilings at the time.

"It was like somebody punched a hole in the sky," said one United employee.

Witnesses said they had a hard time visually tracking the object as it streaked through the dense clouds.

It left behind an open hole of clear air in the cloud layer, the witnesses said, adding that the hole disappeared within a few minutes.

The United employees interviewed by the Tribune spoke on condition of anonymity.

Some said they were interviewed by United officials and instructed to write reports and draw pictures of what they observed, and that they were advised by United officials to refrain from speaking about what they saw.

Federal agency backtracks

Like United, the FAA originally told the Tribune that it had no information on the alleged UFO sighting. But the federal agency quickly reversed its position after the newspaper filed a Freedom of Information Act request.

An internal FAA review of air-traffic communications tapes, a step toward complying with the Tribune request, turned up the call by the United supervisor to an FAA manager in the airport tower, Cory said.

Cory said the weather might have factored into what the witnesses thought they saw.

"Our theory on this is that it was a weather phenomenon," she said. "That night was a perfect atmospheric condition in terms of low [cloud] ceiling and a lot of airport lights. When the lights shine up into the clouds, sometimes you can see funny things. That's our take on it."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 176135
United States
01/01/2007 04:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
FAA spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory:

Cory said the weather might have factored into what the witnesses thought they saw.

"Our theory on this is that it was a weather phenomenon," she said. "That night was a perfect atmospheric condition in terms of low [cloud] ceiling and a lot of airport lights. When the lights shine up into the clouds, sometimes you can see funny things. That's our take on it."

Trained shills really look stupid.
USE YOUR NOODLE
User ID: 32062
United States
01/01/2007 04:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
"To fly 7 million light years to O'Hare and then have to turn around and go home because your gate was occupied is simply unacceptable," said O'Hare controller and union official Craig Burzych."

TRANSLATION:

The craft was a smaller transport/scout ship, and the mother ship it came from is the vehicle which made the 7 million mile trip.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 160850
United States
01/01/2007 04:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Surely they would have that on film because of all the cameras(and please dont call me shirley)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 118161
Canada
01/01/2007 04:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
What do they know about aircraft.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 163776
United States
01/01/2007 04:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Weather baloon?
Yeah sure, a lumbering weather baloon just took off into the clouds at high speed.
Schills need to know that we are on to them.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 160219
United States
01/01/2007 04:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Probably one of ours.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73940
United States
01/01/2007 04:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Thank God...at last they have arrived, and so close to me. I live 20 minutes from Ohare, and welcome our long-awaited friends.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 100253
United States
01/01/2007 04:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
its funny how always when there's a ghost or a UFO etc.. all the "officials" laugh and say you're crazy without even looking into it or anything
TRAINED FOR THIS

User ID: 110965
United States
01/01/2007 04:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Remember, the official announcement is soon.

Thanks for reading...........
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 164244
United States
01/01/2007 04:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Sounds like something was there to me with that many people seeing it while they were just working, sober, not partying or something.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 165078
United States
01/01/2007 04:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
I found it interesting that they mentioned (to paraphrase) "even if it's a military aircraft" in the article and in the video.

A subtle way to begin conditioning people to accept that we have this technology too?
Channing

User ID: 95473
Germany
01/01/2007 05:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
"It was Venus reflecting off swamp gas."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 158854
Canada
01/01/2007 05:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Thank God...at last they have arrived, and so close to me. I live 20 minutes from Ohare, and welcome our long-awaited friends.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73940



meds
Vincent Vegas
User ID: 1583
United States
01/01/2007 05:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
any video or pics?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 160219
United States
01/01/2007 05:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
I found it interesting that they mentioned (to paraphrase) "even if it's a military aircraft" in the article and in the video.

A subtle way to begin conditioning people to accept that we have this technology too?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 165078


We've had this technology for years. Many reports of our having 2 RE craft back in '84. How much more progressed do you think the technology is, all this while later?
I've seen them, (with at least 4 other witnesses) on 2 seperate occasions, but I live near one of the bases that house them.
This will be interesting to see them announce them, when they're probably OURS! Can anyone say PSYOP???
edgar celadus

User ID: 171519
Syrian Arab Republic
01/01/2007 05:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
UFO FILES: Deep Sea UFOs The History Channel, Sunday, 16th July, 2006 After a break of several months, The History Channel’s excellent series, UFO Files, returned to the airwaves with a show about Unidentified Submerged Objects (USOs). This is an aspect of the UFO phenomenon that is rarely reported, yet is more common than one may realise. Only recently, an object was spotted entering the ocean off the South African coast, reinforcing the views of many that UFOs are at home flying either in the sky or under the sea. As the Earth is 75% covered with water, it makes sense that unexplained objects are seen either on or beneath the sea and this programme explores the possibilities not only of alien activity under the surf, but also of what submersibles we may be able to create that might match the characteristics of the reported sightings. The Santa Catalina Channel separates mainland California from the island of Catalina. This stretch of water is as deep as Mount Everest is high and objects have been seen both entering the water and emerging. Preston Dennett is a California UFO researcher who has written several books on the subject (one of which, Extraterrestrial Visitations, will bereviewed in a future issue of UFOData Magazine). He explained that in 1992, hundreds of unexplained objects were sighted near the Santa Monica Mountains. Many of these objects were seen, not descending from the sky, but rising up, as though emerging from the water nearby. Over two hundred craft were seen emerging silently from the ocean on June 14th, 1992. They hovered for several seconds before shooting off into the sky. Witnesses filed reports with the police as far away as Malibu. The programme then played
---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
Page 2
an actual recording of a phone call by a witness to the police. The caller almost sounded ashamed to be reporting what he had seen. Unfortunately, we did not hear the police officer’s response. The wealth of reports filtered up to the US Coast Guard, but they refused a request to search the area of the sightings. In 1989, a large object was seen by multiple witnesses (and picked up on sonar) resting on the surface of the water in the Pacific Ocean. It released several, smaller objects before submerging. It was tracked on sonar heading south towards the Santa Catalina Channel before disappearing. Several researchers, such as Bill Birnes and Stanton Friedman, continue to investigate reports of USOs, assessing their intentions and/or threat level. It seems that one thing that USOs do more regularly than UFOs is to ‘split apart’ or release large numbers of smaller craft. UFOs have been known to do this also, but with the underwater variety, it seems more common. In 1960, the Argentinean Navy tracked two unidentified submerged objects in the Golfo Nuevo, 650 miles south of Buenos Aires. At first it was thought that they were US submarines, but then they appeared to break apart and fly out of the water. Paul Stonehill, co-author with Philip Mantle of UFO-USSR, explained how the objects simply emerged from the water and vanished. Paul went on to tell us that the Soviet leader at the time, Nikita Khrushchev, was so impressed with the report that he ordered his representative in Buenos Aires to find out more about the event. Sceptics suggest that what was seen were submarines firing torpedoes, but it has been noted that in 1960, the firing of six or more torpedoes simultaneously was not possible.In March, 1963, American submarines were involved in exercises, with a fleet of surface ships, a hundred miles off the Caribbean island of Puerto Rico. One of the subs broke off from its assigned course and began pursuing an unidentified object that their scopes told them was travelling in excess of 150 knots at a depth of 20,000 feet!
---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
Page 3
Bruce Maccabee told us that such speeds and depths were, and still are, impossible for today’s submersibles, with the crush depth for submarines being about 7,000 feet. The USO was tracked for four days by the carrier group, with the object moving at impossible speeds before stopping. Reports were sent to CINCLANT (Commander-in-Chief Atlantic Command), but no determination was made as to the nature of the unidentified craft. Stanton Friedman pointed out that when UFOs are spotted in the sky, people see them and report them, but when a deep sea object is sighted, it is usually only the navy that makes out a report and we never learn anything beyond that. We are then shown a clip from a newsreel, informing us that US Navy experimental balloons are the sole cause of ‘flying saucer’ sightings. Nice try, chaps! November 11th, 1972, and the Norwegian Navy began tracking a USO for two weeks in the Sognefjord, one of the longest and deepest fjords in the world. A fleet of ships and submarine-hunting helicopters were tasked with locating the object. On November 20th, the object was seen exiting the water. It was described as ‘a massive, silent, cigar-shaped object’. One of the ships opened fire on the object, but it simply sank back down beneath the waves. Depth charges were dropped to no avail. Then a plan was drawn up to blockade the fjord and trap the USO, but the object disappeared. On 11thOctober, 1492, the ship carrying Christopher Columbus, the Santa Maria, passed over what we now know is one of the deepest parts of the Atlantic Ocean. It is also inside the infamous Bermuda Triangle. Strange lights were seen flashing deep under the water. Then a large, disc-shaped object rose out of the water and sped off into the night sky. A few, short hours later, Columbus would discover the New World.
---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
Page 4
USO researcher, Carl Feindt, explained how Columbus’ log described the object as being like ‘the flickering of a wax candle’, rising and falling. Camp fires on the shore could not be used as an explanation, as land was far beyond the horizon. Indeed, Columbus’ log books describe many bizarre occurrences witnessed during their long voyage to new lands. These included seeing birds that should not have been far from land, yet they were far out to sea, a heavy mast, weighing 120 tons, floating in the ocean (they were the first European ships out there, remember) and stars that danced around the sky. In 329BC, the army of Alexander the Great encountered two, silver discs that emerged from the Jaxartes River in India. It is said that he was so impressed by this sight that he spent six years exploring the river in the world’s first diving bell! Some suggest, though, that Alexander was not searching for USOs, but for the fabled land of Atlantis. Over the years, the legend of Atlantis has diversified from being a philosophical tale about the dangers of man’s vanities to becoming a myth of a lost civilisation that utilises advanced technology to survive beneath the ocean. Some even suggest that the Atlanteans themselves were extraterrestrials. Sticking with the ancient world, Paul Stonehill returned to tell us about inscriptions at Abydos in Egypt that resemble a submarine and a helicopter (he missed out the fighter jet!). Sorry to burst Paul’s bubble here, but those glyphs are what is known as a palimpsest, where hieroglyphics are carved over the top of old ones (after the previous ones were plastered over). Years later, the plaster has fallen off to reveal the mixed-up carvings. Nothing to do with ancient technology, I'm afraid… In 1067AD, a ‘flaming object’ was seen to enter the sea off the English coast, then it remerged before sinking below the waves once more. On August 1st, 1904, the cargo ship, Mohican, on its way to Philadelphia, was ‘enshrouded in a strange, metallic vapour that glowed like phosphorous’. Carl Feindt has researched this case and said that the ‘cloud’ approached the ship from across the ocean. As it enveloped his vessel, the captain tried to busy his crew, but nothing could be moved while the vapour surrounded them. The ship’s compass spun
---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
Page 5
wildly and the decks became magnetised. On October 4th, 1967, at about 11:20pm, one of the most famous USO cases in history occurred in the Nova Scotia town of Shag Harbour. This small community has become known as the Canadian Roswell in recent years and the case is interesting because not only were there multiple eyewitnesses, but there are government documents verifying that something fell into the ocean that night. Chris Styles, co-author of the book, Dark Object, took up the story. At the time of the incident, nobody thought that what entered the water was a UFO. It was generally assumed that an aircraft had gone down and a search began for possible survivors. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) searched the ‘crash site’ in boats until 3am, finding nothing. Later, Canadian Navy divers arrived and they, too, began searching beneath the water. Eventually, an official report was filed, labelling what had crashed into the sea as a ‘UFO’. The report stated that the object had travelled from south to north along the coastline before entering the water off Shag Harbour. RCMP officers on the shoreline watched the object travelling under the surface, leaving a trail of foam in the water. Later, reports emerged that a second craft had entered the water to rendezvous with the first object. Styles claimed that the authorities knew exactly where the objects were and that the second craft assisted the first in moving towards the Gulf of Maine, where they both broke the surface and flew away. In fact, a photograph exists of two objects leaving the water of Shag Harbourand flying off. The official report clearly states that what crashed into Shag Harbour was ‘no known object’. The island of Puerto Rico is generally considered to be the Americas’ greatest hotspot for USO
---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
Page 6
sightings. Local group, Project Argus, took us to the Laguna Cartagena, a wildlife reserve in the south-west of the island. It is also a major hotspot for USO activity. On October 8th, 2002, at about 9:30pm, local police officer and Argus member, Carlos Torres saw a red, glowing USO flash out of the Laguna Cartagena. It then hovered just above the surface for several minutes before crashing back into the lake. November 20th, 2004, produced what may be a video of the object emerging from the lagoon and flying away. Another Argus member shot the night vision footage of what appears to be a rotating, disc-shaped craft. Route 303 has officially become Puerto Rico’s ‘Extraterrestrial Highway’. This happened after a 1997 incident in which a UFO was said to crash nearby, leaving scorched ground and many bemused witnesses. Researchers on the island are suspicious of US Navy research balloons that are launched regularly over the Lajas region. They claim that their real function is to observe UFO and USO activity. Project Argus claim that government documents exist that secret investigations tookplace into UFO and USO activity in the region, but the conclusions were that the objects posed no threat. Some researchers believe that a major USO base exists in the deep waters off Cabo Rojo, west of Lajas, with submerged caverns that might reach all the way to the Laguna Cartagena.In 1969, sailors aboard the USS Calcaterra witnessed a USO that displayed remarkable properties in the frozen waters of Antarctica. They reported a huge, submarine-shaped object burst from beneath the thick ice and rocket into the sky. Revered Russian researcher, Vladimir Ajaja, told of an incident that happened near Leningrad in the
---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
Page 7
winter of 1976. A USO crashed down through the ice, manoeuvred underwater before breaking back through. Carl Feindt reported that USOs appear to melt the ice they break through, leaving a clean hole, rather than smashing their way, sending chunks flying in all directions, as a meteorite would (plus meteorites don’t generally re-emerge and fly away!). In 1988, famous (or infamous, depending upon one’s viewpoint) UFO photographer, Ed Walters snapped an image of a USO in Gulf Breeze atop what appears to be a waterspout. This has caused some researchers to suggest that UFOs/USOs use water as a fuel source. There have been other reports of unidentified craft sucking up water from lakes and reservoirs. Theoretically, electromagnetic propulsion could allow submersibles to travel at great speeds underwater. An EM field around a craft would reduce drag, thus allowing it to perform manoeuvres impossible for traditional submarines. The US Navy actually experimented with an EM sub in the 1960s, with a degree of success. Marko Princevac, of the University of California Riverside, has created an experiment, devised to prove that supersonic propulsion underwater is possible. He found that a streamlined object would move underwater better than, say, a cube… duh! Princevac’s data shows that, while an aircraft travelling at Mach 1 requires 15,000 horsepower of energy, a submersible travelling at the same speed would require over 1 million horsepower. At the moment we do not have the technology to build such an engine that would work beneath the sea. Deep Sea UFOs was another great episode from UFO Files, with some excellent graphics and informative interviews. So now, we not only have to watch the skies, we must keep our other eye on the seas!

[link to 72.14.209.104]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 172079
Australia
01/01/2007 05:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
its funny how always when there's a ghost or a UFO etc.. all the "officials" laugh and say you're crazy without even looking into it or anything
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 100253

How is it fucking 'funny' ?
It's obvious isn't it! Aren't we past the games ? it's 2007.
REAR VIEW (NLI)
User ID: 150179
United States
01/01/2007 05:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Quick...someone email NORAD...I am sure they would appreciate this for their latest version of project blue book!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81
United States
01/01/2007 05:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
This story was just on National Public Radio. Interesting, very interesting.

It might be on their archives tommorrow. Check here to see.

[link to www.npr.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 172079
Australia
01/01/2007 05:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
"It was Venus reflecting off swamp gas."
 Quoting: Channing

See ! I told you, but none would believe me.
It's always VENUS !
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28401
United States
01/01/2007 06:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
It was on NPR a few minutes ago...

IT MUST BE TRUE!!!














chuckle
Aliens over Chicago
User ID: 168416
United States
01/01/2007 06:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
alien03 alien11 alien16

We are looking for Bundy's. Ha

Ha

Ha
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 176174
United States
01/01/2007 06:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
"But if somebody was bouncing a weather balloon or something else over O'Hare, we had to stop it because it was in very close proximity to our flight operations.""


how did they 'stop it' ?
Fool
User ID: 171541
United States
01/01/2007 06:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
"But if somebody was bouncing a weather balloon or something else over O'Hare, we had to stop it because it was in very close proximity to our flight operations.""


how did they 'stop it' ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 176174


Laser weapons!!! or scalar!!!

chuckle
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 114636
United States
01/01/2007 06:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Amazing how they try to make you see something you didn't see or viceversa.
i is that which i is

User ID: 155774
United States
01/01/2007 06:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
hi

O'Hare is not the White House lawn.

God did not reveal himself to Bush.

Bush will tell you what you saw. He is the decider.

Nothing to see here.

Ignore it.

Go back to work.

Go shopping to get the economy back on line.

Use your credit cards so that the World Bankers and the Chinese will own your home and YOU for the next 30 years.

Go back to sleep. sheep







Peace grouphug
"I am not afraid to stand alone, but it's always more fun if I have friends standing with me." Lena Coleon.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 176184
United States
01/01/2007 06:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
This story was just on the local news in Indiana. Wonder why it has taken so long to come out if its such a big deal?
edgar celadus

User ID: 171519
Syrian Arab Republic
01/01/2007 06:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
[link to www.ozonelayer.noaa.gov] South Pole "Ozone Hole"

[link to www.ozonelayer.noaa.gov] North Pole "Ozone Hole"

[link to www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov]

[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 138920
United States
01/01/2007 06:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
"Our theory on this is that it was a weather phenomenon," she said. "That night was a perfect atmospheric condition in terms of low [cloud] ceiling and a lot of airport lights. When the lights shine up into the clouds, sometimes you can see funny things. That's our take on it."..........

Oh sure. Happens here ALL the time!!!

Don't you get it?
If everyone saw this there would be mass panic and you would refuse to go to work tomorrow. There would be no tax base. The country would shut down. The psych wards would be FULL.
A little at a time is what this is about.

That way there won't be too much panic when they all gather around the world.
anonanon
User ID: 62642
United States
01/01/2007 06:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: UFO OVER O'HARE AIRPORT - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
There is a small military base that is a part of O'Hare which is how O'Hare started as an air field.

Also have the huge Great Lakes Naval Base due north of Chicago.

Probably ours.

And last night on one of the New Year's Eve things from Times Square there were two kids insisting they saw some over the celebration....good funny, but did have everyone looking.

News