Julian Assange, the DNC, and Plausible Deniability

Think about it:

If you were the DNC you would need a Plan B in the event that Hillary starts tanking in the polls against Trump. You would need a method to bring back in your Plan B option - Bernie - once he is needed again. Enter Julian Assange. He spent years gaining street cred with us, although truth be told many of his "revelations" have never been independently confirmed. I am starting to think he is a double agent, planted early enough to gain street cred, but when the time is right he will deliver what the Democrats need, which is precisely what we are seeing this past week with the "shocking" revelations of DNC corruption and dirty dealing. If my theory is correct, then we should expect Bernie to rescind his endorsement of Hillary very soon. Then Hillary will either be forced to step down by her own Party or will be indicted for real this time. Bernie steps in and the DNC claims plausible deniability of the whole affair, deferring to Assange and the Russians. Speaking of the Russians, the idea that the Russians need to hack the DNC to get inside information on Trump or to influence the election, is ridiculous. Putin has Russian state-run media at his disposal (as does every head of State of every developed nation in the world). If Putin needs to get a message out, he doesn't need to hack the DNC to do it.