Enquirer: Charles confesses to Diana's murder

BUST OUT THE KRUMPETS N TEA BRITTARDS......

got a link?

No, bought the Enquirer while checking out.

Charles confronted by sons with new evidence from second autopsy, Charles admitted "I did it! I had no choice. Your mother was out of control. She was a threat to the Monarchy!

Sons secretly commissioned the exhumation of Diana's body after Queen Elizabeth told them Charles had blood on his hands.

New autopsy reveals Diana survived the crash but was later murdered with a lethal injection in the ambulance taking her to the hospital.

Top communications reveal Charles ordered the assassination carried out by rogue M15 spies; Diana was suppose to die in the wreck but didn't, British agent posing as a paramedic was part of the back up plan to make sure she didn't live.
The injection stops the heart is undetectable unless coroners specifically test for it.

Newly discovered cellphnerecor o dings make it clear intelligence officers arranged a cover up to make her death look like an accident.

Everybody says that, but the fact of the matter is, the Enquirer is right more often than any other newspaper in the United States. It's far more trustworthy than the Jew York Times or the Wall Sheit Jewrnal.

I think it's he Globe, not the Enquirer.

Traces of deadly succinylcholine chloride were found, administer too much andth e heart is compromised and death follows.

William 34 couldn't contain his fury at his father's confession. He yelled at his dad, How could you do it? How? Wasn't it enough you made her life a living hell?

Charles snapped back, Diana was headstrong and willful. Said he couldn't risk her bringing shame to the royal family because of her relationship with lover Dodi Fayed. Your mum waspre gnanat by a Muslim! That would wreck the crown! Sons glared with contempt and hatred and rushed out of the room.

William and Harry are beside themselves with anger and want Charles to pay for what he did. They're demanding justice for Diana. They are ready to seek murder charges.

Was this done long ago? Why would there still be "tissue samples?"

The CIA funded the National Enquirer in America through by Generoso Pope Jr., who was working for their psychological warfare unit at the time.

They already had the newswire locked down at the time, so they could kill stories in the regular press, divert them to the tabloids, thus eliminating the believability in the stories. They simply add a few details or change things around. Yet, the tabloids probably have more truth in them than regular media.

A couple weeks ago they were talking about elongated skulls found in Antarctica proving Aliens came here in ancient times. Thing is...those skulls in the story exist. They are from South America. And yes, they prove something, since the skull had red hair attached (impossible in the archeological record as we know it).

Many similar cases like that.

Assume its the same for the brits. Actually, I know it is. I could go into more detail but I've left enough crumbs for those interested.

This is interesting if reliable. We all know the family was in on it. Diana had to go because her humanity was too strong, a threat to the cold blooded lizard control of the monarchy. (im serious) plus she was going to dillute the lizard gene pool by marrying a human muslim guy, producing possible religious threat offspring, which the psuedo christian monarchy couldnt allow. Add Diana to the long list of murders by the monarchy. How is these people arent held to account for protecting pedofiles?

Oh my gosh, you're right. It's the "Globe".

Motive: Impregnated by Muslim Dodi al Fayd.

If that pregnancy went to full term then a Muslim would be in line for the throne of UK, bringing two world monarchies into position for leadership when Islam took global domination in 2020.

This would also be motivation for 911, the bringing the US to it's knees in the Awakening. Islam grew 200 million boy soldiers to be of fighting age in 2020.

Very clear the motives of Islam.

written up for the drama but think there are grains of interesting truths in the enquirer some of the time.

Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 08/31/2016 09:29 PM

The fact that the accident took place in a tunnel so that there would be no real eyewitnesses always smelled fishy. Plus the first person to come up to the car was a medical doctor. seems a little too neat and cute.

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 08/31/2016 09:36 PM

This story will be h u g e in a day or two.

Thanks for posting.

LOL

Of course you're gonna read it in the Enquirer. Now it'll pass off as crock of shite.

Thread: What Princess DIANA Knew ..." they are LIZARDS"

Charles may never become KING.
The old battleaxe just keeps on going.

Fuck off nsa shill.

There is tons of evidence to point to her murder.

Years ago, photos surfaced that clearly showed that Diana was very much alive, following the crash. And, the ambulance had taken an unfathomably long time to arrive, and to carry her to a hospital that was only a short distance away.

(Here's an excellent timeline of the events of that evening, just in case anyone is interested: [link to news.bbc.co.uk] )

Thus, these new "revelations" seem extremely plausible, given that they appear to line up exactly with the known facts related to the situation (and with all of the "conspiracy theories" surrounding her tragic death).

Awesome thread, OP!

?

It sounded like the previous commenter was confirming that there is truth to the theories about Princess Diana's murder -- and their statement about the CIA's funding of the Enquirer appears to be true, as well.

So, why are you accusing them of being a shill? They said that, "Yet, the tabloids probably have more truth in them than regular media"; that's not something that a "shill" would say. And, the "crumbs" they provided really are pretty helpful.

Why do you think that the NSA would say such things? I'm confused.

No. That child would have never been in line to the throne.

But definitely a relative.

It doesn't matter if Diana was pregnant (I don't believe she was) any child she had would NOT have been in line to the throne. She was divorced from Charles - it's only HIS legitimate children that are in the line of secession. She might have been an aristocrat, but she wasn't an actual royal herself until she married Charles - the heir to the throne - and she lost that staus on divorce. Even if they'd allowed her to keep the 'royal' status, her children still wouldn't have been inline.

At worst any further kids she had would merely be step brothers or sisters to the Princes. They wouldn't even have had titles.

Having said that, I do think the Royal Family had something to do with the assassination. No way was that an accident.

Hah that should be line of succession not secession. Derp!

Diana was merely having a fling with Dodi Fayed, in order to make the man she really loved jealous. That surgeoun fella (another Muslim). He even took her to meet his mother and apparently they talked marriage.

She really loved that guy according to her friends but in the end he bottled it. Couldn't handle the celebrity aspect which would interfere with his work, and I suppose the cultural differences were too great. Her friends believed she was trying to get him back and Dodi was an attempt to make him jealous. Didn't work.

She'd have probably dumped Dodi at some point, she wouldn't have risked her reputation by getting seriously involved with a lightweight like him. It's his Father who has been pushing the narrative that she was preggers and they were gonna get engaged when there is very little evidence for that, and a lot against it.

Funny thing was her death was the threat to the Monarchy, because it was looking like it could backfire for a while. They didn't expect the reaction that occurred and at one point palace staff lowered the Flag when they wouldn't 'officially' do it.

That was actually funny, and Queenie must have been shitting bricks that the peasants would storm the gates if she didn't lower the flag and speak to the people. They were just intending to treat it as a private family matter, no big deal, until the people went batshit crazy on them.

No she was not divorced

How would you view King William, the head of the Church of England (Anglican Church) having a Muslim Mother?

How would you view Diana, standing on the balcony with Prince William in her Hijab???


Now, more importantly, where do you find tissue samples after 20+ years and would that drug still be in the tissue after that long?

I have a strong feeling this is legit!!

I think it is more likely that morons feared the child would be the messiah - that is who they are looking for - that is who they want to kill - they know the person will not come from "a pure line" - in their own puritanical sense i.e. first born to first marriage non "mixed" etc/


If you want a reason - that is their reason - the wonderland intel morons - child molesting pedo corrupters of the planet - they fear what they have done - they fear the consequence so they eternally seek the one who might come and end them etc yada yada - they are murdering scum etc yada - and



...

some of them - all this time - have been looking for a baby...






debauched satanic twisted WEIRDOS