Crow claims the SpaceX Landings Failed With Eyewitness Proof!

Ehh fuck em, let em eat crow.

Well I'm not specifically talking about this event in particular. My point is the more degrees and "education" a person possessesthe less open minded they become to the fact that things are not as they seem.

Its not the age of anti-intellectualism. ITS THE AGE OF FRAUD! Unfortunately a group of your PHD peers have perpetuated a fraud on humanity for over 60 years called global warming. These so called PHD's have colluded in fraud, have been caught tampering and rigging evidence to support their Globalist agenda. What happened to the real scientific method?

I like you astro, your videos are good and respect what you have to say. But the global warming scientists are a fucking fraud that push agenda 21.

There is so much fraud in this certified space it boggles the mind.

Even if the participants are not nefarious, they perpetuate the system. They belong to the club and protect the club that they have built so much of their self esteem through.

I agree with the previous poster, the more 'educated' a person is, the more closed minded they are especially if they have been given 'certifications'. That paper hanging on the wall is pure evil, but they covet it like all of their other material possessions.

I had always thought that the more knowledge a person has, the more questions it creates. Not the other way. I wonder if that is due to false intelligence? With false intelligence you have to stifle opposing view points because the foundation you have built your reality on is so unstable.

With wisdom it is completely different. Your foundation is solid thus you are able to incorporate new ideas into your reality.

Proving that a craft landed is different than proving space is what we are told it is. And I think crows main argument as of late is that space isn't what we're told. He took eyewitness reports and video and told his conclusion. You attack him for that...you have a complex Astro. Ever since I've been here, 6 years, you've had a complex. I wouldn't have you on my channel if was him. There is no debating a person who is 100% convinced they know what actually is...only argument.

Dr assyroshill, this post has 29 ratings, almost all of them 1 stars.

They crossed a line when the took the name of telsa.

In the meantime, I am a fat old man and I decide what level of chicks joe biden and his Dr. wife perv out on.



[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Also pay your taxes to the clinton foundation/IRS if you have any sense of normality.

I think they left long time ago. I don't want them to stop posting and I was actually enjoying the conversation. We should not try and silence these certified masters. If we did, how would we learn?

Maybe through perseverance and trials we can find out how and why they tick. Then with the newfound information we can bring them back into the light.

Yes and earth is flat ,man o man. Just this week I was thinking about who and what keeps us grounded in reality

This looks incredibly fake.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Astro claims to be educated but go ahead.

Ask him about 9/11

And find out the shill won't give his opinion because he knows 911 can't be argued anymore and he either really believes his overlords or he knows the truth but won't shill for them.

It's as simple as that.

I personally think the account of Dr Astro is used by more than one person because he always has time to debunk things on here. Come on astro tell us about 911 how smart you are astro.

The earth might be flat. And 'muricans will still suck IRS dick after 911. I wish we had smart people. I don't even want giants. I just want a wholesale reboot of the USA tax code.

Then I want to see how it affects the timeline of humanity.

I ask anyone who argues about space with someone to ask them about what they believe happened on 911

If they say official story then you can stop arguing with them. I consider 911 the benchmark of human sanity.

If you don't understand it was an inside job, you will never open your mind up for other things so you are a lost cause

Phd in science usually means theyll do or say anything for funding

go astro

Truth being it most likely was not ready for prime time.

I thought Astro was exposed as a bot or spook of some sort.

SpacehoaX is a total fraud.

If you believe that you can land a several ton rocket in the upright position on a moving barge... you are an idiot. nuf sed

And yes, I'm more intelligent than 99% of GLPers, without a doubt.

[youtube] [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

I can't believe you've used a You Tubers upload as a way to get back but then whatever floats your boat to make yourself look and feel good. Pathetic. I'm subbed to crows channel and i find his thinking way more on target than a supposed astro physicist. Yeah Astro, what's your take on 9/11?

May I ask what you doctorate is in and from which Uni?

Not a shill nor a troll. I actually value you a bit on here for many of the idiotic conspiracy theories you debunk.

I must also say there are some that seem to be quite valid that you seem to go after with equal enthusiasm.

This is where Astro loses me. He debunks a lot of silly conspiracy theories and does a service but he debunks obviously real ones-TRUE CONSPIRACIES-with equal effort

It makes sense. All the data and telemetry that they used after the first crash landing was based on a failed landing. Its flawed from the start. Unless they started from scratch and had a backup program ready.

The question everyone should be asking not that is obviously a crow is how did it get access to a galactic federation of light death ray gun.

I was replying only to 9/11


I want to add, I feel the use of the youtuber was justified for CCrow777-He's capitalizing off his admittedly very odd moon videos, and going off the rails as a profiteer of conspiracy theories with a limited investigation. He's become spread thin and shallow and is out of his depth.

Clyde Lewis gave him a platform on one show and his stock went up. I respect Clyde and don't think Clyde has an interest is Crow, his moon videos were going viral. Clyde could have had a counter balance to Crow on the show but didn't

No thanks. That info can easily be used to stalk me. If you think I'm wrong about something then by all means to bait it with me. I'm not appealing to my PhD I'm simply saying that I found that having one only results in ridicule from those I debunk.

Just as an example, I've found that if I debunk any conspiracies on Facebook where my education can easily be scene, I'm immediately attacked for having a PhD. To them I'm nothing but part of the scientific establishment and part of the problem.

Red is my friend. I also agree with his analysis 100%. It does not matter what you personally believe. The evidence shows conclusively that the landing of the Falcon 9 was real and successful. Crow and his witness, and you for that matter, all fail to understand the basic principles of how fast sound travels vs how fast light travels. The empirical evidence from those with far superior equipment than his witness shows that the landing was a success.

Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy. It does not matter how many of you fail to understand this, the event was real The Landing was a success and the rest of you are wrong. Don't get me wrong, I love seeing how many people are wrong and how many people fail to understand it even when presented with the evidence. It is incredibly informative as to the uphill battle that education has against ignorance.

Not defending SpaceX as i think there is enough smoke, no pun intended, to have a much closer look

I know my IQ is higher than 99% of GLPers. I don't claim to be more intelligent in any discipline of higher education especially physics and "rocket science".

I respect peer review process only because it is the best we have to go by. Without it we would still be living in an age where the Church of Rome dictates truth.

Massive ego is what someone has when they fail to see that they've been had by a false conspiracy and they believe that anyone who debunked their conspiracy must be paid by the government to do so.

I'll accept that. Can you at least say it is in some form of science? I don't take you as a person with a doctorate in women's studies or humanities.