HUGE! UN's "New Global Human Order", Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development

Remember the UN is run by the council of Islamic states. No more western hegemony, no sir. This is why Britain has already fallen to Islam, they just don't realize it yet as well as most of Western Europe. Notice how the pattern of mass immigration goes to the democratic nuclear armed states with the largest armed forces? US, UK, France, Germany. Not coincidence folks.

They're going for the whole ball of wax here with Oblozo giving away the internet. Things are looking bleak, very bleak indeed. If nothing is done soon it will get beyond our control permanently. China has the manpower to carry out the occupation army disguised as UN "peacekeepers". All for the sake of stopping a phony race war brought on by Soros and the Dems. Pure, dripping evil creeping across the globe.

And the UN is taking over our internet on Oct 1st...

Say it ain't so !

"New Global Human Order" sounds sinister.

I prefer the old local human chaos.

This is nasty. What happened to individualism?

Repent while there is still time.

Nobody has the manpower to occupy the united states. Some sections of perhaps but no way the whole country. And their losses will be terrible in the attempt.

Step by painful step, Americans have been, and will be, divested of their property just as planned in Agenda 21.
Agenda 21 is called ‘the agenda for the 21st century’ and that refers to global fascism / communism. An end to national sovereignty.

...The UN's concept of sustainable development, is quite clear, and was articulated by Maurice Strong, Secretary-General of the 1992 UNCED at which Agenda 21 was adopted. He said:

"It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class -- involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles and small electrical appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning, and suburban housing -- are not sustainable (emphasis added)."3

Harvey Ruvin, a vice-chairman of ICLEI, was asked how Agenda 21 would affect liberties with regard to the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, private property and freedom of speech. He replied: "Individual Rights must take a back-seat to the collective."
The arrogance of these people is breathtaking.

the answer is checks and balances--one look at our government now reveals the importance

where is the balance in one government over the entire world--there is none

all the power in one group and we all know by now the result of too much power

That's right. Agenda 21 is just the foundation for Agenda 2030 with is going to make everybody in the world happy, prosperous and equal.

To do that, it will need to take charge of your entire life, all your assets (so they can be redistributed fairly across the globe), and all your attitudes and beliefs, (so that they can be suitably modified).

If you thought Agenda 21 was bad, read up on Agenda 30.

Individualism is not beneficial to the collective, and will not be tolerated.

I doubt the UN would do anything to hurt citizens on purpose. People make mistakes and I think Obama messed up a lot but he's going to try to correct his actions. He's feeling it, and his family I am sure. No one would purposely try to devalue the USD or cause global disasters on purpose.

Why would someone or a government do that?



Think about it, no one would want millions of people to die. They will figure something out, and make things better. They have been running these countries forever.

No nuclear war, no nothing..

Sorry guys but you are going to live until over a hundred!

Better pay your bills and taxes.

ask the UN why their Peace keepers are raping little kids in Africa or watching as women get raped. either get educated tor take you propaganda back to the Farm and collect your Soros dollars. so where is the UN with Venex=zuela and ehlping the people ? MIA, just my opinions

:Wtchtwr: