Credible source told me nuclear war is now certain.

Thread: UVB-76 The Buzzer very active - 7 messages past 5 minutes

You mean credible glp evidence? I agree, nuclear war seems inevitable.

If you are in Birmingham, I suggest you to make a bug out plan. Plan for car, bike and on foot. Go south.

Can a World War still be avoided?

by Thierry Meyssan

Events around the Syrian crisis are accelerating, and reveal the depth of the conflict between the Atlantist camp and the Russo-Chinese block. After having observed the growing risk of a generalised war – conventional or even nuclear - Thierry Meyssan analyses the manœuvres of the United States and Russia’s responses to them.

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | BEIRUT (LEBANON) | 7 OCTOBER 2016

After the destruction of the pride of the Emirati Navy on 1 October, the armies of the Gulf petro-dictatorships are hesitating to continue the war with the Syrian Arab Republic on their own. It is clear to everyone that the ground-sea missile which destroyed the wave-piercing catamaran is an extremely sophisticated weapon, the like of which has never yet been seen on any battlefield. It was not fired by the Houthis, nor by the partisans of ex-President Saleh, who do not possess weapons of this order, but by Russia, which has been secretly present in Yemen since the summer.

The idea of a coordination of jihadists with their local allies alone, without the intervention of the United States, is all the more difficult to imagine since the rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Qatar has consistently sabotaged the previous stages of the war.

Washington is therefore seriously considering the only remaining option – direct military confrontation.

The United States have solicited the 64 States and the 3 international institutions which have joined their so-called anti-Daesh Coalition in order to launch an attack against Damascus. In practise, only Canada, France, Holland and the United Kingdom are present. The idea is to fire cruise missiles on Damascus and Lattakia, and to bomb the Syrian Arab Army. This project was announced to members of NATO during the Atlantic Council of 27 September. It was supported by Senator John McCain in the Wall Street Journal.

This operation implies the reorganisation of the on-going preparations for the liberation of Mosul in Iraq, currently occupied par Daesh. Everyone already knows that the real objective of this Coalition is not as announced, but is directed at changing the occupant in Mosul. It is not aimed at putting genuine Iraqi representatives in power, nor its historical inhabitants, but only Sunni Iraqis, in order to create a «Sunnistan». The Coalition has not bombed Daesh, but did not hesitate to annihilate - «by accident» - a militia composed of Shia volunteers who had come, unlike the Coalition, to deliver the city from obscurantism. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan gave the game away by declaring to the newspaper Sabah that once Mosul was liberated, the city would belong to its inhabitants, «... and only Sunni Arabs, Turkmen and Sunni Kurds can stay». In other words, the Coalition proposes to finish the job that Washington had handed to Daesh. Its true objective is to endorse the ethnic cleansing practised by the jihadists, notably the expulsion or the massacre of Christians and Yazidi Kurds, in order to create a religiously homogeneous state. Just as we have already announced several times, Daesh will have to migrate from Mosul to al-Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor, the same way that they evacuated Jarabulus faced with the Turkish army, without putting up a fight.

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

its a response to Putin's Nuclear drills.

Exactly how it is described in Daniel 11 and Second Edras 15
in the bible..


soon the King of the north (Putin) will say enough is enough

and make his move south to Saudi

and I don't think it will go do nuclear war

but it could..


This is what the bible says is coming in the ME


[link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)]

The Globalists need to do something to give an excuse for US to cancel elections rather than let Trump win.

Putin is a fool to wait for the elections to do what
he has to do...

NATO nuke subs are stationed in harbor with nukes on board at all times.When they go out for training they go to waterside pier like loading structures (usually within fifty miles) & disarm before & after training ops.I'm sure of this.Ensures constant inspection & the task of loading & unloading the missle almost muscle memory for their crews if that makes any sense.I call BS on OP's post but not on the certainty of nuclear war.Small sized tactical nukes have been used on numerous occasions in recent years within the Middle East.Shit hit the fan a while ago.Middle east is shit.Europe is shit.Africa is shit.America needs to make sure there is tp on the roll.Asia's eatin' good & austrailian don't count there's only like five or six people there.