Sci-Fi Cult of Evolution: How did it calculate the critical blood Ph at 7.35 and program lungs and kidneys to maintain it with no knowledge?

'man' IS an ape.

Very well could be, how would one prove either way?

Hmmm... I say that every other day or so.

Doesn't seem to stop your yapping does it?

You can't prove god exist, but evolution CAN and HAS been proven. Over and over I have given you examples, that you utterly ignore, because your belief is more important than the facts.

You are a stumbling block and a false prophet.

Doesn't seem to stop your yapping does it?

You can't prove god exist, but evolution CAN and HAS been proven. Over and over I have given you examples, that you utterly ignore, because your belief is more important than the facts.

You are a stumbling block and a false prophet.

Evidence? That does not matter to DGN(OP).

You are effectively debating evolution with an endless loop recording of Jehovah Witness cult propaganda.

If you question DGN's qualifications, like a degree in any physical science, he will defecate scripture as a defense.

If you point out that Charles Taze Russell and J. Rutherford were complete total frauds, he will just rationalize that off.

An absolute bot for Jehovah Witness, no matter what evidence.

Oh, fuck off.
Conspiary stuff-OK- a little bit of realism-...How about that

Nope, couldn't have been something that occurred naturally. Must be some sort of magic shit that made this happen.

Magic sky man, wave your hand!

Yes, no "magic" involved in "evolution", just the God of "random mutation". What utter nonsense and crap.

In other words, evolutionists have no idea what causes anything, so they make up "random mutation". Voila! Presto! Magic!

One cannot be an intelligent thinker and buy the Darwin bullshit.

YOU may have come from a monkey, but I sure as hell didn't.

Evidence? That does not matter to DGN(OP).

You are effectively debating evolution with an endless loop recording of Jehovah Witness cult propaganda.

If you question DGN's qualifications, like a degree in any physical science, he will defecate scripture as a defense.

If you point out that Charles Taze Russell and J. Rutherford were complete total frauds, he will just rationalize that off.

An absolute bot for Jehovah Witness, no matter what evidence.





"9 because what may be known about God is manifest among them, for God made it manifest to them. 20 For his invisible [qualities] are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable; 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify him as God nor did they thank him, but they became empty-headed in their reasonings and their unintelligent heart became darkened. 22 Although asserting they were wise, they became foolish 23 and turned the glory of the incorruptible God into something like the image of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed creatures and creeping things." Ro1:19

Scriptural diarrhea, that's real science there. Irrefutable proof, NOT

"Jehovah Witness cult propaganda."
"And they will certainly build houses and have occupancy; and they will certainly plant vineyards and eat [their] fruitage. 22 They will not build and someone else have occupancy; they will not plant and someone else do the eating. For like the days of a tree will the days of my people be; and the work of their own hands my chosen ones will use to the full. 23 They will not toil for nothing, nor will they bring to birth for disturbance; because they are the offspring made up of the blessed ones of Jehovah, and their descendants with them. 24 And it will actually occur that before they call out I myself shall answer; while they are yet speaking, I myself shall hear." Isa65:21

Yeah! let's defecate some bible quotes, how about this one

Malachi 2:3

3 “Look! I will ruin your sown seed because of you, and I will scatter dung on your faces, the dung of your festivals; and you will be carried away to it.

No God or other supernatural intervention need be involved.
If these life support systems didn't work well enough, we wouldn't be here to write about them.

On the other hand, we wouldn't have so many medical problems and have to listen to hundreds of Rx commercials if everything had been designed perfectly by a God.

So much for Darwin.

If an evolutionist got here from a monkey mutating upwards against all odds what prevents him from spontaneously mutating right back down with all the odds?

Yeah, there could only be a god if we were all immortal.

More logic please.

There is no upwards or downwards moran.

But if your question is "why don't humans evolve to lose their limbs and eyes?" Then the answer is pretty obviously that there is no reproductive advantage to it.

Wow. You haven't read Darwin nor the 160 years of research that have passed since.

You are firmly stuck in the 19th century. Special note for you. It is the 21st century today. Try to catch up.
After all, your beloved JW cult claimed the end of the world how many times now?

Did the world end in 1914 as your JW cult predicted?
Or in 1915?
Or in 1917?
Or in 1918?
Or in 1919?
Or in 1920?
Or in 1921?
Or in 1925?
Or in 1932?
Or in 1935?
Or some vague time in the 1940s?
Or in 1951?
Or in 1975?
Or in 1980?
Or in 1986?
Or in 2,000? LOL at that one.
Or in 1780?
Or in 1798?
Or in 1799?
Or in 1829?
Or in 1840?
Or in 1844?
Or in 1846?
Or in 1873?
Or in 1874?
Or in 1878?
Or in 1880?
Or in 1881?
Or in 1906?
Or in 1910?


These are all failed claims from your crackpot cult about the end of the world.

A naturalist explanation is reasonable, even if we do not fully understand how everything works. Science answers a lot of questions, and creates many more questions that need to be investigated. There is NO NEED to make things up.

This view makes much more sense than the superstitious belief that a careless designer couldn't get it quite right (and that 99% of the life forms which have lived on this earth are now extinct).

Evidence? That does not matter to DGN(OP).

You are effectively debating evolution with an endless loop recording of Jehovah Witness cult

propaganda.

If you question DGN's qualifications, like a degree in any physical science, he will defecate

scripture as a defense.

If you point out that Charles Taze Russell and J. Rutherford were complete total frauds, he will

just rationalize that off.

An absolute bot for Jehovah Witness, no matter what evidence.

Evidence? That does not matter to DGN(OP).

You are effectively debating evolution with an endless loop recording of Jehovah Witness cult

propaganda.

If you question DGN's qualifications, like a degree in any physical science, he will defecate

scripture as a defense.

If you point out that Charles Taze Russell and J. Rutherford were complete total frauds, he will

just rationalize that off.

An absolute bot for Jehovah Witness, no matter what evidence.