Godlike Productions Banner
Users Online Now: 479 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 15,230
Pageviews Today: 56,796Threads Today: 104Posts Today: 1,594
03:03 AM
NEW GLP LIVE VOICE & TEXT CHAT




Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Post a New Thread
Post New Thread
Reply to this Thread
Reply
View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Join Now, Free! (& No Ads!) Forgot Your Password?
E-mailPasswordRemember
Rate this Thread
Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 
Page 1, 2, 3, 4

Enigmatic Archaeology

 RSS 
Normal Is Subjective
User ID: 192013
2/6/2007 3:50 PM
Re: Enigmatic ArchaeologyQuote

Thank you Harte. You are right, I looked at the website that had a brief and apparently inaccurate description of the site, was flabbergasted by the size of the stones, and just decided to post it as it was presented. Shame on me. Your critical thinking and investigation into background and context of these “enigmas” is exactly what I hope to inspire here.
You are quite welcome. Glad to dispel some of the fog that I myself once dwelled in concerning these sorts of pseudoarchaeological claims.


The websites that you posted yesterday are also very informative in this regard. I spent most of the afternoon yesterday reading them.
I've spent some time collecting links to information that, to me, is far more fascinating than anything Graham Hancock has ever fabricated and put to the page.

You might like to read what I wrote to one of the woo-woos that responded to me in another thread:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]


hey harte your a closed minded jackass

Coward 190206,

You're welcome to your opinion, as am I. Speaking of which, here's mine.

You are an ignorant idiot. Ignorance, of course, is not a fault. An ignorant person merely is unaware of the facts. IOW, an ignorant person need not remain so, since facts are available and it is possible to learn them.

But you are an idiot because you wish to remain ignorant. You want to wallow in the filth of your own comfortable ignorance. It disturbs you when someone tries to shine a light on any fact that contradicts the flawed world view you've concocted based on this ignorance.

For example, an ignorant person can be misled by the authors mentioned in the title of this thread. They can develop an erroneous world view based on the scams perpetrated on them by these con men.

The difference is, the ignorant person, having become informed, becomes angry at the authors that lied to them. The idiot, on the other hand, becomes angry at the person that informed them.

Harte


I was myself once ignorant. I was taken in by Erich VonDaniken. When I found out I'd been had, I became angry at myself as well as EVD. Thus the crusade began!


You obviously have an interest in these types of investigations and your input is much appreciated.

Christopher.

You might like to read some of the discussions at some of the other sites I mentioned in the above threrad I linked to. Primarily the Ancient and Lost Civilizations section at hairy_ballz.

Harte
 Quoting: Harte


Here's some more fabrications from Hancock: [link to www.grahamhancock.com]
I thought I'd beat the inevitibility of death to death just a little bit.
Duncan Kunz Subscriber
The Debunker King
User ID: 184720
2/7/2007 9:12 PM
Re: Enigmatic ArchaeologyQuote

Here's some more fabrications from Hancock: [link to www.grahamhancock.com]
 Quoting: Normal Is Subjective


One of the nice things about knowing something first-hand is that you can compare it against claims or statements from people you don't know to figure out if they're singin' it or slingin' it.

One of the first articles from your citation was one about Ponape in Micronesia and the Nan Madol ruins. "Bingo", says I, because I grew up in Microneisia, am a scuba diver, and had visited (and dived) all over Micronesia (including Ponape and Kosrae) a month ago [link to www.duncankunz.smugmug.com] so I figured out if this article was bogus I would know it.

Well, it is bogus, and, yes I know it. Whomever wrote that site seems to have cherry-picked things to get his point across. For example, he talks about "prismatic basalt" in words that imply it was man-made; whereas it's a naturally-occurring type of basalt. The fact that Nan Madol was built in a formation of that stuff (including the areas in 200 meters of water) doesn't mean that the Saudeleur (Ponapeian for "old ones") built those "columns" underwater.

It doesn't. Those columnar formation are natural hexagons, just like the basalt in the "Giant's Causeway".

I don't know about the rest of his stuff -- at least, not enough to use it as a BS-filter. But the stuff I do know about, Hancock is wrong. That doesn't give me very much confidence in him as a credible resource.
Those western imperialist warmongers beat us to the Moon. Damn!
Page 1, 2, 3, 4
Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Post a New Thread
Post New Thread
Reply to this Thread
Reply
View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Click Here To Donate To GLP!



 Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional



Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 10,000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis.

The content of post on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Privacy Policy - Terms Of Use


Copyright 1999-2009 © GodLikeProductions.com

Page generated in 0.046s (5 queries)