Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,868 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 674,541
Pageviews Today: 1,076,994Threads Today: 425Posts Today: 6,197
11:38 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 186186
United States
01/23/2007 11:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
yawn crazy jerkit
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 185857
Australia
01/23/2007 11:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
I am the OP. I am not the antichrist. This will be my final post.

As we have seen, the church is to undergo ruin and persecution:

-- C.8 Q.98 --
Of the church men, the blood will be poured forth as abundant as water;
for a long time it will not be restrained,
woe, woe, for the clergy ruin and grief.

-- C.5 Q.43 --
The great ruin of the clergy is not far off,
Provence, Naples, Sicily, Sees and Pons,
In Germany at the Rhine and Cologne,
vexed to death by those of Maine

The antichrist will cause this to happen.
But not through a direct attack on the church - their defenses are too strong.

The antichrist will cause an awakening.
All humans will become awake to the reality of our lives,
and the lies which we have been told, not just by the church,
but by every human who has ever strived for power over others.

The awakening will cause much discontent.

Many will be persecuted and held accountable - including the church.

The antichrist will, amongst other things, cause the end of the belief in Christ the son of God.

The antichrist is not one person, but three:

-- C.8 Q.77 --
The antichrist three very soon annihilates
20 & 7 years of blood endured this war
The unbelievers dead, captive and exiled
Blood, human bodies and red hail covering the earth.

In this amazing quatrain, one of few that actually mention the word antichrist, we are told several things:
There are three people who are considered the antichrist,
and it doesn't take long for them to destroy
the 20 & 7 (2007) years of blood caused by the christ fraud.
A fraud which has caused war, and the persecution of many forward, rational thinkers.
A fraud which has cost millions of lives.

But how will the three achieve this:

-- C.8 Q.99 --
Through the powers of three temporal kings,
the sacred seat will be put in another place,
where the substance of the body and the spirit
will be restored and received as the true seat.

The three will cause the sacred seat (the church) to go away (physically or metaphorically),
and an awakening, a realisation of our reality, our body and spirit, will occur (will be restored, finally!) and we

will accept it as the true seat - our true reality.

And who are they - the temporal kings? Obviously not warrior leaders or leaders of a country, but temporal kings.

Kings who lead by ideas and thought. Philosophers in some way, but very clearly, Writers!

-- C.10 Q65 --
Oh vast Rome, your ruin draws near,
not of your walls, but of your blood and substance;
the sharp one in letters will make so horrid a notch,
pointed steel wounding all the way to the sleeve.

Three writers/authors will bring about the awakening that will see an end to the church.

I know who they are, but they don't. I will tell you here, and you will know, but they will deny it.

But their destiny is clear. Humanity will be awakened. Humanity will mature.
That is their objective, and Christ and the church will be put far away.

An atheist who is tolerant of religion is not an antichrist.
Christ and his church and the irrationalities have ruined our existence and our planet.
The antichrist is very much against the church. The church, and human irrationality are evil.

Let the naming begin:

1) The first author who is probably the most visible anti-church proponent today is Richard Dawkins. His message is clear. He has created the framework for exposing the destructive irrationalities caused by belief in non-reality, believing in a higher power other than the self, the body and the spirit.

On its own, his material makes an interesting read, but struggles to be powerful enough to change any 'believers' views.
[link to www.richarddawkins.net]

2) The second author is a scholar who has attacked the church using the churches own historical writings, many of which have been suppressed and many of which are contradictory to their current writings. Unfortunately, he lives in fear of his life and I must respect his wishes and not advertise his name here. (But it is not Dan Brown!)

His writings expose the lies of the Christian church, exposing them as the fraud that they are. His works, which are of a highly detailed and academic nature, will one day be held up to the church with the demand "Tell us it is not so!"

3) The third author, who will complete the puzzle, and be the gel which links the three together into an unstoppable force for change, is someone that I met recently. My quest was to find this person, and now I have. He does not agree that he is an antichrist, but I know the prophesy, and I say to him that his work will awaken people to the lies that they've been told, and will show them the truth of our existence. Such an awakening cannot help but undermine the dark tactics of the church.

I have been fortunate to have had a sneak preview of this work, The Twin Paradox, and I could see the future. I could see a future where the quest for power does not guide human history. I could see a future where humans open their eyes to who they really are.

You can preview it here. I am informed that the world can expect its release in late February. That will mark the beginning of humanity's next phase. Enlightenment will not come to us through magic, through alien ESP or through a universal frequency shift. It will come through wisdom, knowledge and conscious awareness.

[link to www.the-twin-paradox.com]

The authors above will object to their inclusion in this list. That is to be expected. They are modest individuals who only strive to improve our lives. Combined, their influence will reshape this world.

That is all.
 Quoting: Newstradamus 186297



No.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 173076
United States
01/23/2007 11:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
I thought so.

Clever use of Nostradamus.

But, I thought so.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 172449
Australia
01/23/2007 11:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
"There is no mention that Napolean was an antichrist
There is no mention that Hister was an antichrist.
There is no mention that Mabus is to be an antichrist.
There is no mention that a muslim is to be an antichrist"

that i totally agree with. it is something that majority of people do not know and just take the propeganda as facts.
Have you noticed in all prophecies (no matter who) the West and Christianity always wins? THis alone should tell you right away that it is all propeganda.

Prophecies by themselves exist, but their interpertations are all taylored according to needs.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 122539


Is said something similar to this in a small speech I held quite some time back.

Although I don't trust the Jews because of their NWO, I have always questioned, who will we be left with?

We can get rid of the Jews but then are we to have the Christians begin the next NWO?

Either way it's not a good thing.

Every country should remain independent, hence my voting against our country (Aussie land) being under the monarchy.
And I will be damned if I ever end up ruled by religion.

To me, all religious nutters are extremists.

I was bought up a CATH but I was smart enough to break away from a faction (and that's all religions are in my eyes, factions and faction follwers) and remain to this day, not a follower of anyt type of movement besides one called mankind.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 173076
United States
01/24/2007 12:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
The Nostradamus shit is alright
I hadn't heard some of those before
I see some sense in the argument but disagree on the conclusion.

Dude
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 185857
Australia
01/24/2007 12:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
"There is no mention that Napolean was an antichrist
There is no mention that Hister was an antichrist.
There is no mention that Mabus is to be an antichrist.
There is no mention that a muslim is to be an antichrist"

that i totally agree with. it is something that majority of people do not know and just take the propeganda as facts.
Have you noticed in all prophecies (no matter who) the West and Christianity always wins? THis alone should tell you right away that it is all propeganda.

Prophecies by themselves exist, but their interpertations are all taylored according to needs.


Is said something similar to this in a small speech I held quite some time back.

Although I don't trust the Jews because of their NWO, I have always questioned, who will we be left with?

We can get rid of the Jews but then are we to have the Christians begin the next NWO?

Either way it's not a good thing.

Every country should remain independent, hence my voting against our country (Aussie land) being under the monarchy.
And I will be damned if I ever end up ruled by religion.

To me, all religious nutters are extremists.

I was bought up a CATH but I was smart enough to break away from a faction (and that's all religions are in my eyes, factions and faction follwers) and remain to this day, not a follower of anyt type of movement besides one called mankind.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 172449


Republican or not, it makes ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE.

The whole republican vote charade was mere window-dressing for the "democracy" illusion.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 186098
Mexico
01/24/2007 01:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
-- Century 10 Q.72 (Engl. Trans.) --
In the year 1999 and seven months,
from the sky will come the great King of Terror.
He will bring back to life the great King of the Mongols.
Before and after War reigns happily.

 Quoting: Newstradamus 168405


Bush stole elections on 2000, he bring back the kingdom of terror of his father ....George Bush father nickname on skulls and bones was Magog
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 172449
Australia
01/24/2007 01:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
"There is no mention that Napolean was an antichrist
There is no mention that Hister was an antichrist.
There is no mention that Mabus is to be an antichrist.
There is no mention that a muslim is to be an antichrist"

that i totally agree with. it is something that majority of people do not know and just take the propeganda as facts.
Have you noticed in all prophecies (no matter who) the West and Christianity always wins? THis alone should tell you right away that it is all propeganda.

Prophecies by themselves exist, but their interpertations are all taylored according to needs.


Is said something similar to this in a small speech I held quite some time back.

Although I don't trust the Jews because of their NWO, I have always questioned, who will we be left with?

We can get rid of the Jews but then are we to have the Christians begin the next NWO?

Either way it's not a good thing.

Every country should remain independent, hence my voting against our country (Aussie land) being under the monarchy.
And I will be damned if I ever end up ruled by religion.

To me, all religious nutters are extremists.

I was bought up a CATH but I was smart enough to break away from a faction (and that's all religions are in my eyes, factions and faction follwers) and remain to this day, not a follower of anyt type of movement besides one called mankind.


Republican or not, it makes ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE.

The whole republican vote charade was mere window-dressing for the "democracy" illusion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 185857


I have to agree. When you're right, you're right.

It's religion that we have to watch out for. It's the longest ongoing war known to man and whether it be republican or otherwise, it makes no difference.

Well put.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 186315
United States
01/24/2007 01:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
rant
feru

User ID: 186098
Mexico
01/24/2007 01:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
-- Century 10 Q.72 (Engl. Trans.) --
In the year 1999 and seven months,
from the sky will come the great King of Terror.
He will bring back to life the great King of the Mongols.
Before and after War reigns happily.



Bush stole elections on 2000, he bring back the kingdom of terror of his father ....George Bush father nickname on skulls and bones was Magog
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 186098



that was me, sorry did not log
  Enki was the real engineer of the human race. He was the Sumerian god of science, engineering, magic, strategy, music, and lovemaking
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 173076
United States
01/24/2007 02:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
So, the antichrist is now a good guy.

Yeah, right.
What the...
User ID: 173076
United States
01/24/2007 04:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nostradamus was mis-interpreted. The antichrist is not what you think or who you'd expect
We are a cynical lot aren't we?

That's the best bloody new interpretation of Nostradamus that I've heard in a long time.

What do we want?

Humanity to be destroyed by a catastrophy?
Humanity to be saved by star children?

If there's hope that we can save ourselves, I'd jump for the sucker.

If it's all just crap, where are all the so-called Nostradamus experts?

Cheers mate. Good work!





GLP