Backwards time travel is not possible. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73514099 United States 11/29/2016 05:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jai_Guru_Jesus_Om Breshears is Off: Ask Me Why User ID: 65955727 United States 11/29/2016 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think you can travel back in time as a disembodied observer in a 3-d surround holographic playback of what is essentially recorded media. (B)ullshit™ always needs an amplified bullhorn demanding kneeling subservience - or else.- SyncAsFunk The light within me always draws me back to make the dark decision to leave the false counterfeit light. -New Heart |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2351437 United States 11/29/2016 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Perpetual Active Shooter Drill User ID: 61909697 United States 11/29/2016 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48696487 United States 11/29/2016 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48696487 United States 11/29/2016 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Craazee8 User ID: 72893225 United States 11/29/2016 05:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Two points to be made against backwards timetravel. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53197708 POINT 1 A law of physics states matter can't be created. This means there is a determined amount of particles in the universe. Any time travel in reverse would add particles ( our intrepid time traveler and any matter he takes with him) into those space/time slices thus violating the first law of thermodynamics for the universe' space time for then forward. When you go back in time the particles of your body or ship or whatever could have been a rock, tree or some maiden 500 years ago. So if you time travel into the past, you just added particles into that timeline, unless you take them away from their rightful timeline owner. A side note is that by the time we live a normal lifespan we don't have any of the original cells or particles we were born with. We move thru the environment all the while exchanging particles. You could actually share particles with every human ever born. You could be made up of Henry the 8th’s piss and spit. POINT 2 If our traveler could re-arrange particles from the past to re-constitute himself and any matter he brings back rather than duplicate or add particles (which is impossible), he would change the past by “taking particles away from the rightful owners in that timeline. It would be like travelling back in time and the particles that are you now would have to be taken away from those legitimate “timeliners”, thus affecting the past just by showing up. This means there is a determined amount of particles in the universe. Those particles would not be from that universe, they would be from a different dimension. Time is a dimension. Time is relative. So, it can be traversed relative to dimensions. |
Agent Smith 2014 User ID: 71581191 United Kingdom 11/29/2016 05:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Life is a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48696487 United States 11/29/2016 05:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Two points to be made against backwards timetravel. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53197708 POINT 1 A law of physics states matter can't be created. This means there is a determined amount of particles in the universe. Any time travel in reverse would add particles ( our intrepid time traveler and any matter he takes with him) into those space/time slices thus violating the first law of thermodynamics for the universe' space time for then forward. When you go back in time the particles of your body or ship or whatever could have been a rock, tree or some maiden 500 years ago. So if you time travel into the past, you just added particles into that timeline, unless you take them away from their rightful timeline owner. A side note is that by the time we live a normal lifespan we don't have any of the original cells or particles we were born with. We move thru the environment all the while exchanging particles. You could actually share particles with every human ever born. You could be made up of Henry the 8th’s piss and spit. POINT 2 If our traveler could re-arrange particles from the past to re-constitute himself and any matter he brings back rather than duplicate or add particles (which is impossible), he would change the past by “taking particles away from the rightful owners in that timeline. It would be like travelling back in time and the particles that are you now would have to be taken away from those legitimate “timeliners”, thus affecting the past just by showing up. This means there is a determined amount of particles in the universe. Those particles would not be from that universe, they would be from a different dimension. Time is a dimension. Time is relative. So, it can be traversed relative to dimensions. Particles can not be destroyed or created. The atoms in your eye were created at the beginning and have remained in this universe. They may have been a ruby on a queens finger, but they are part of your eyeball now. |
Tomorrow Tomorrow User ID: 73078412 Canada 11/29/2016 05:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Craazee8 User ID: 72893225 United States 11/29/2016 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Two points to be made against backwards timetravel. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53197708 POINT 1 A law of physics states matter can't be created. This means there is a determined amount of particles in the universe. Any time travel in reverse would add particles ( our intrepid time traveler and any matter he takes with him) into those space/time slices thus violating the first law of thermodynamics for the universe' space time for then forward. When you go back in time the particles of your body or ship or whatever could have been a rock, tree or some maiden 500 years ago. So if you time travel into the past, you just added particles into that timeline, unless you take them away from their rightful timeline owner. A side note is that by the time we live a normal lifespan we don't have any of the original cells or particles we were born with. We move thru the environment all the while exchanging particles. You could actually share particles with every human ever born. You could be made up of Henry the 8th’s piss and spit. POINT 2 If our traveler could re-arrange particles from the past to re-constitute himself and any matter he brings back rather than duplicate or add particles (which is impossible), he would change the past by “taking particles away from the rightful owners in that timeline. It would be like travelling back in time and the particles that are you now would have to be taken away from those legitimate “timeliners”, thus affecting the past just by showing up. This means there is a determined amount of particles in the universe. Those particles would not be from that universe, they would be from a different dimension. Time is a dimension. Time is relative. So, it can be traversed relative to dimensions. Particles can not be destroyed or created. The atoms in your eye were created at the beginning and have remained in this universe. They may have been a ruby on a queens finger, but they are part of your eyeball now. no particles would be created or destroyed. they would simply traverse a dimension. |
Jai_Guru_Jesus_Om Breshears is Off: Ask Me Why User ID: 65955727 United States 11/29/2016 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think you can travel back in time as a disembodied observer in a 3-d surround holographic playback of what is essentially recorded media. Quoting: Jai_Guru_Jesus_Om If you can't interact, are you really there? You are in the middle of what actually happened and can move about freely. You may even be able to read minds. However, you aren't really in the past. (B)ullshit™ always needs an amplified bullhorn demanding kneeling subservience - or else.- SyncAsFunk The light within me always draws me back to make the dark decision to leave the false counterfeit light. -New Heart |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73514955 United States 11/29/2016 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Time travel is based on quantum mechanics, not Newtonian physics ....go back to school, jughead, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73514099 Boy. I bet you made yourself feel smart. Everything you said is wrong though. You are either a liberal, middle schooler or Canadian. and yet you offer nothing as proof, but stupid inbred banter. |
Deplorable-Elect Don Solo User ID: 73168454 United States 11/29/2016 06:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Space and Time are the same thing. You aren't adding or removing either. You are just rearranging it. Also the thing about matter is out of context. You forgot the part about changing form. Not that I am saying it is possible, just that your explanation for why it is not is not valid. Last Edited by The Rickest Rick Sanchez on 11/29/2016 06:07 PM The universe is basically an animal. It grazes on the ordinary. It creates infinite idiots just to eat them. The Rickest Rick Sanchez comments are meant for entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to reflect the feelings and opinions, implied or expressed, of the author. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48696487 United States 11/29/2016 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Time travel is based on quantum mechanics, not Newtonian physics ....go back to school, jughead, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73514099 Boy. I bet you made yourself feel smart. Everything you said is wrong though. You are either a liberal, middle schooler or Canadian. and yet you offer nothing as proof, but stupid inbred banter. I though you spoke in "inbred banter" with the fantastic zinger you posted. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48696487 United States 11/29/2016 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Space and Time are the same thing. You aren't adding or removing either. You are just rearranging it. Quoting: Deplorable-Elect Don Solo Also the thing about matter is out of context. You forgot the part about changing form. Not that I am saying it is possible, just that your explanation for why it is not is not valid. :invalid: Here in case you missed it. "If our traveler could re-arrange particles from the past to re-constitute himself and any matter he brings back rather than duplicate or add particles (which is impossible), he would change the past by “taking particles away from the rightful owners in that timeline. It would be like travelling back in time and the particles that are you now would have to be taken away from those legitimate “timeliners”, thus affecting the past just by showing up. " |
Deplorable-Elect Don Solo User ID: 65456342 United States 11/30/2016 11:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Space and Time are the same thing. You aren't adding or removing either. You are just rearranging it. Quoting: Deplorable-Elect Don Solo Also the thing about matter is out of context. You forgot the part about changing form. Not that I am saying it is possible, just that your explanation for why it is not is not valid. Here in case you missed it. "If our traveler could re-arrange particles from the past to re-constitute himself and any matter he brings back rather than duplicate or add particles (which is impossible), he would change the past by “taking particles away from the rightful owners in that timeline. It would be like travelling back in time and the particles that are you now would have to be taken away from those legitimate “timeliners”, thus affecting the past just by showing up. " Yeah, I didn't miss it. You didn't understand. There is no moving of anything from one place/time to another. It is more like reallocation within the same container. It is not a "different universe" in the past that you are going to. No matter left or entered the sum total of mass/energy of spacetime. There is no reason to suspect you would be "taking particles away" from those timeliners. Even the most literal interpretation of your though experiment could draw these "particles" from the quantum foam or simply condense the matter/energy that ultimately must exist already because it congealed in the future to become that person. Everything is already everywhere/everywhen. Just in a different form. Your atoms/energy already were there back in time, or you couldn't exist now. The universe is basically an animal. It grazes on the ordinary. It creates infinite idiots just to eat them. The Rickest Rick Sanchez comments are meant for entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to reflect the feelings and opinions, implied or expressed, of the author. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46893394 United States 11/30/2016 11:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69731773 United States 11/30/2016 11:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69731773 United States 11/30/2016 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Human babies Those cells divide and are created from egg/sperm Where do those 76 million cells (approx) come from? Physics is wrong about this Also / if Big Bang is real.. the singularity could not have contained all the atoms in present universe Physics has some fundamental flaws But people font like hearing that |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48696487 United States 11/30/2016 11:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71327011 United States 11/30/2016 11:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |