True; but the article says that it is a stronge radiation spike emanating from the Israeli embassy. That would seem to be something different than low radiological levels.


Especially if that report came from Indymedia.org that is known to have heavy bias against Israel? Doesn't surprise me. The writer of the article could have insert the paragraph with the allegation about Israel, as I was reading the whole article, the flow of it seem went off with the paragraph about Israel and alleged radiation spikes inserted. There was no follow-up to that paragraph, as you would have notice that.

As a rule in journalism writing, when a writer insert a paragraph with sensational claims or allegations, there is to be a follow-up paragraph countering or supporting the preceding paragraph with sources confirming it or not.

There were no sources confirming that paragraph (in red) in the follow-up paragraphs. That's why the flow of the article went off with that paragraph in red.