Mandela Effect: More Risky Business

I remember him as Nelson Danmella.

And wasn't it known as the Danmella effect?

Ok, this is crazy!!!!

Good find OP. I remember him having dark glasses on.

I'm afraid that we are just on another world where these inhabitants are mean as fuck!

This is not an overreaction.

This is what you get when somebody has a logical explanation for your inquiries that simply don't fulfil your expectations.

This is what you get when you blatantly disrespect to someone that cared enough to answer to your thoughts.

Anyway... I have to learn how to avoid to give dogs what is sacred and to avoid to throw the pearls to pigs.

why do idiots who dont believe or care for it even bother to waste their time n effort to comment stupid irellevant shit, generally insults..theres a thousand threads here i dont agree with nor interested in, i dont even open them to look but you morons take the time to read and comment for what reason? either you are a deadshit with no life or a paid troll, take your pick n fuck off

I think you are confused about what the Mandela Effect is. You should research and return, so that we are on the same page. It will make our conversation more fruitful.

Some of you may be already aware that the dance scene with Tom Cruise in Risky Business has now changed. Well, for some of us it has anyways.



For the "mandela tards" you will remember him wearing a white shirt, and black raybans. His short was also shorter, and you could clearly see his tighty whities throughout the scene. You will also notice how much different his dance moves are, and the weird stuff he does towards the end.

So I decided to do a little research. Have a look at what i found:

[link to imgur.com]

What you are seeing is a sample of an actual mental health professional's book. It describes the dance scene absolutely on par with "mandela tards", saying he has a pressed white shirt, and he's wearing wayfarer Raybans.

Now, another observation. If you look at the bottom of the picture, I noticed one of the references shows from 2013. I immediately thought that this book might be recent. So i looked up the book, to see when it was published.

[link to www.worldcat.org]

This proves that the book was published this year. That means that the changes were made very recently. I'd like to ask you a question. What do you think the statistical probability would be that the "mandela tards" all shared the same memory, and it matches the book exactly? I'd say the chances are so slim, that you could call this proof.

Have a look at a few tribute videos. Notice they are wearing the raybans and a white shirt. They also pop their collar, which happens later in the current version.



This video is from 2014. Yet more proof that the change is recent.


When you go to youtube, there are hundreds of videos mimicking the most recent version. If you have common sense, anyone that tries to call you a retard for this i would avoid. They are on the wrong team.

let those that have eyes see.

I remember him as Nelson Danmella.

And wasn't it known as the Danmella effect?

Ok, this is crazy!!!!

Until someone can give an example of a personal thing changing, like a deceased loved one suddenly alive and well, I will never believe this theory.

It doesn't require belief. You either experience a different set of group memories or you don't. It is obvious that you dont, and that won't change. Maybe you are the lucky ones. We shall see.

Can you give me a personal example, not something Hollywood produced or involving a celebrity? If this is real, other things must change, not just movies and celebrity death dates. Do you have an uncle that came back to life 3 weeks ago? A cat you swore you had but everyone else tells you you never did? I will never believe the people who think this is real until then. That's what I meant. Where's the timeline where my dad is still alive? What about my friend with cancer? Why during one of these shifts does my son not turn into a daughter? It does require belief. Why are you so unlucky for experiencing it if I'm lucky for not?

Quick! All Mandela Effect "experiencers" please give me all of your personal experiences of loved ones dying twice, vanishing siblings, etc
PERSONAL experiences.
If you can't, explain to me why it only happens to movies and celebrities. I am genuinely curious.

So u have never remembered events happening different then other ppl in ur family?

no they cannot alter such things, only simple things like text they can alter..i assume they are in early development of some sort of time travel..its not your normal time travel most think of, they cannot sendthings back in time, they can however send bits of information in digital form back in time.

this has been theoretically possible for over 10years since i 1st heard the of the theory, seems now they have found a way to do it..how, we can only guess, it's something to do with quantum physics i know that

I remember him as Nelson Danmella.

And wasn't it known as the Danmella effect?

Ok, this is crazy!!!!

I didn't see a logical explanation. Can you please elaborate on This?

If you feel your explanation is more valid than a mental health diagnostics manual, I'd certainly like to hear it.

The concern of this thread is very real.

You all know that there is something called programming, that is the way you get into the internet, and actually see something in the computer you are using right now.

Duh, is not a computer, is a mobile phone...

A mobile phone that has plenty of computer capabilities by now so it's a computer, a tiny one but still one.

Somebody programmed the core of the operating system that you are using the part that you don't interact with, the part that you don't see, somebody also programmed the GUI (Graphic User Interface), the icons, the dashboard, the desktop, the screen, the menus.

Somebody else programmed the web browser that is used to get to GLP for example, it could be Chrome, Firefox (The UTMOST Fucking awesome Web Browser), Opera (currently, a clone of Chrome), Safari (Chrome's dad) OR the native web browser of Android (a son of Chrome)

The app that you use in order to get into your Facebook feed is (surprise) another web browser.

Now, finally somebody programmed the website that you are looking right now.

All that has to be pretty much common knowledge by now, but in case you missed about it, well now you know it, and if you already knew it, it hurts no one to mention those facts.

SO.

Dogs can be programmed to act the way we like them to act, it's called training.

Soldiers can be programmed with desensitization techniques to suffer less in battle field, it's also called training.

People can be programmed to consume, to work in an underpaid job, to over-qualify themselves, to always pay something to the government, to wilfully subjugate their fates to a single person (representative democracy), to reproduce, and to consume again, it's wrongly called education.

But in the hidden traces of society there are imperceptible strings that help people to create a false sense of security and that it's called social programming.

Back in the day social programming was very broad, the target were the masses as subjects, now, with every single thing "on line" we allow to both government and corporations to target us in a more unique way through light or heavy data mining.

There you have a reason for why 'the snowflakes' are that way, they feel special because they have been targeted almost individually.

But the scope of 'the strings' that I mention doesn't end there, there are plenty of fake breadcrumbs in the most insignificant and meaningless topics, such as 'a cheese movie'.

They are there to destabilize the sensitive minds, the truly most special intelligence among all of us and to bring them in the verge of madness, at least publicly.

Let me show you something about this:

Unfortunately the video I am sharing with you was encoded with a potato, I know. Put aside that.

Don't let them win, you, the one afflicted with such 'trivial' concerns, you my friend, you are special INDEED.

Don't let them win, don't play their game; arise.

Happy new year.

Greetings.

With all the introduction gibberish I completely lost the thing that I wanted to point out, apologies.

The scene originally was made with Tom Cruise WITHOUT the Ray-Bans.

The MSM justification for both Niles and Bieber's impersonation of the scene (just to mention something) was to provide the movie atmosphere as a whole in a single presentation, the compression of a meaningless yet iconic scene.

The truth is that they just want to fuck with your mind big time, making you remember something that you actually didn't see.

Sorry.

Who are they? Don't just say TPTB. How is it possible. Explain. And why only to some? And why only celebrities and movies? To what end?

Didn't Tom Cruise originally have a dildo in his hand when he was dancing?

Shit. It's different too. So many changes to keep up with. I don't even try anymore. It's crazy here in this simulation.