Global warming is a cover story for the earths 26,000 year precessional cycle

Link?

my word is my bond, you wont find this info on any website.

So 12 billion tons/year of human produced CO2 is irrelevant?

Liar liar pants on fire!

Yes, according to those who spend their live studying this sort of thing and who are infinitely more knowlegeable than those who frequent GLP:

[link to www.timesonline.co.uk]

[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

A professor from MIT has already proven that the earth has had periods of high CO2 before.

There's no ribbons and bows, and not even a hint of saccharin-coating, in this interview.

George Green tells us quite calmly that the Earth was 'engineered' to cater for a capacity of 500 million humans.

Clearly, at 6 and a half billion, we're well over the limit.

This is why the Illuminati plan to reduce the surplus, in the near future, using nuclear weapons.

He says that the messages he's receiving from spirit tell him that it is unlikely enough people will wake up in time to stop this de-population.

Cool............listen, if you dare:


The Big Picture: Part 2
(Running time = 48 mins)George Green

George Green is a former investment banker (Registered Financial Principal with the N.A.S.D. and a Broker/Dealer, Securities Underwriter, Real Estate Developer, Insurance Broker and Publisher, who was invited into the power elite. Faced with a moral and ethical dilemma, he turned his back on his former associates to walk an entirely different path.

In this second of our two interviews with George, we discuss the chilling details of the atomic bombs of World War 2, reverse engineered UFO technology from the 50's and the Tibetan monks who held the records of Atlantian times.

George has published several books and is offering all our viewers a free downloadable copy of his book 'Handbook for a New Paradigm' - all you have to do is click below to get the inside scoop.

His web site also offers a large number of hard to find books and DVD's that look at subjects like Population Control, Crop Circles, Forbidden Archeology, Religious and Political Cover ups and much more. Go to www.nohoax.com

[link to www.consciousmedianetwork.com]

Not exactly. Literally. The last 4 dvances have occurred on APPROXIMATE (sorry for caps but Trin doesn't allow ACs to use italics) 12,000 year intervals. But prior to the Pleistocence Epoch, there in no clear rhythmic cycle.

Nice try, no cigar.

If you saw an Inconvenient Truth and thought every thing Gore said was a lie and made up and don't want to give any credence to scientists who have given their lives to study the planet then what can I say?........ You are not very intelligent.

No more relevant than the geologic records of Earth's history.

Interesting articles, thanks.

I would say that if you believe science that won't even consider alternative empirical explanations then your lack of intelligence is an embarrassment to us all.

If you don't understand the above, let me put it in terms I'm sure you'll understand:

You're showing your ass.

where is the evidence that indicates 13,000 year ice-age cycle?

its everywhere, the geologic record tells quite a story.

Past Cycles: Ice Age Speculations
[link to www.aip.org]

I just read that article and it mentions 19,000, 21,000, 23,000, 100,000, 38,000 and 75,000 year cycles and barely mentions that a 13,000 year cycle that “may be indicated”. No mention of precession of the equinoxes either---well kind of with regards to the tilt of the earth, but this is discussed in regard to the 19,000 and 21,000 year cycles. Not very convincing.

So ya'll don't mind if we all go to one side of the bus as we go around this corner? Lets see if we can't tip this bitch over.

You will be hard pressed to find any scientist in the world that is knowledgable on the subject to refute the fact that if we pump enough carbon dioxide into the atmosphere there will be no negative effects........

They are obviously in disagreement about whether the current levels are responsible for any significant changes to atmospheric conditions, This is not the point.....If we don't control how much C02 we allow to be emissed then there is no doubt we will affect the climate of the Earth in ever increasing amounts.

Just as in the capitalistic domain we are only looking short term...... We must think long term or risk being responsible for one of MANY threats to life on Earth.

Do you really want to say that since we are at risk from many other sources that it is not worth thinking about?

This supposed 13,000-year ice-age cycle is repeated elsewhere. Where does this statement come from?

bump

this may help clear up some confusion...or it may leave you more confused...only you can say for yourself...

[link to www.guba.com]

so why did my link fail...?


try this


[link to www.guba.com]

OP, the things I have studied and read have led me to the same conclusion that you put so concisely in your post. I like how you referred to a "cover story". It is also a very lucrative cover story for a lot of people.

I lean toward the theory that the earth's magnetic field governs tectonic activity, and that changes in the magnetism affect underwater vulcanism; heat from volcanoes on the sea floor is the engine that drives climate change.

I read a lot of stuff about the ancients and the precession of the equinoxes before I read Robert Felix's "Not by Fire but by Ice" [link to www.iceagenow.com] and his theory kind of drew everything together that I had been reading up to that point. I'm convinced he's on to something even if a lot of the connections between geological forces, the galaxy's magnetism, and climate past, present and future remain mysterious.

I think you put things very nicely in your original post.

thank you, I merely draw on the spirit which hears the earths voice to make all things known to us. Any credible geologist will tell you that the Valley of Giza where the great pyramids are located was inundated with water as little as 11,000 years ago. This indicates that once we have passed the galactic plane it may take somewhere around 2000 years before the earth starts correcting itself causing the waters to recede.

One ice-age does not make a pattern.

heading into another one 13,000 years later does

No, it does not. You have to include the previous ice-ages. One ice-age ending and one beginning is still just one cycle.

But never the less a 13.000 year cycle is mentioned.

"Some cycles were tentatively identified, including one with a 13,000 year length.(34) Comparison of the Greenland and Antarctic cores showed that the climate changes were truly global, coming at essentially the same time in both hemispheres."

[link to www.aip.org]

But nevertheless, a 13,000 year cycle is mentioned.

"Some cycles were tentatively identified, including one with a 13,000 year length.(34) Comparison of the Greenland and Antarctic cores showed that the climate changes were truly global, coming at essentially the same time in both hemispheres."
[link to www.aip.org]