Breaking NOW - Seattle Judge BLOCKS Trump's Immigration Ban | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58820811 Canada 02/03/2017 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Yes I Did !! User ID: 73895229 United States 02/03/2017 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is just a circus !!!! Damned insane liberals !!! "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly." Albert Einstein. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60263096 United States 02/03/2017 10:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73896143 United States 02/03/2017 10:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | it's amazing how many of you jerkoffs have no idea how our government works. Courts can declare an executive order illegal or unconstitutional. Quoting: coyotes 72352042 The most amusing, or egregious, part, is that a lot the people in this thread seem to think they are "conservative." The FEDERAL judge, in this matter, is attempting to uphold an actual conservative viewpoint by attending to the actual U.S. Constitution, not some stupid "order" made up by Mr. Blown Away in the popular vote. Do they still teach Checks and Balances in the civics classes you kids facebook/snapchat through? Eat me. Judges have different legal opinions about the same set of facts all the time and all claim to follow the constitution. If you don't like Trump, bitch. Kiss my ass. Or I'll bitch slap your annoying punk ass back to high school. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24076418 United Kingdom 02/03/2017 10:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73896143 United States 02/03/2017 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | it's amazing how many of you jerkoffs have no idea how our government works. Courts can declare an executive order illegal or unconstitutional. Quoting: coyotes 72352042 The most amusing, or egregious, part, is that a lot the people in this thread seem to think they are "conservative." The FEDERAL judge, in this matter, is attempting to uphold an actual conservative viewpoint by attending to the actual U.S. Constitution, not some stupid "order" made up by Mr. Blown Away in the popular vote. Do they still teach Checks and Balances in the civics classes you kids facebook/snapchat through? Hey ASSWIPE...thats what " liberal" FEDERAL judges were doing when states like Texas were trying to enforce immagration laws at a state level and were told to stop because it was a federal mandate. Yes, exactly. Lord, I am becoming Mr. Hand in Fast Times at Ridgemont High. FEDERAL LAW "trumps" state law. CONSTITUTION trumps all. When Mr. Conservative Judge says, "No likey, may not be CONSTITUTIONAL," he is suggesting ultimate stakes, to be decided by the PARENTS. MAYBE EVEN GRANDMA AND GRANDPA. We will all to be told to go play in the yard while they talk. What is actually happening here is surprisingly normal in our country, a federal judge is helping fast track this sucker to the Supreme Court where it inevitably has to go. You all should calm down. This is the country at work. Look at it this way, if Agent Orange wins, which he very likely will, he will be validated and emboldened. From your Trumpian perspective, this is little stay is not at all a bad thing. It is certainly not sedition. It's actually kinda cool how shit gets decided. Your momma's mouth was orange after she did me a favor. Or maybe it was white. Oh wait! It was creamed colored. |
WaitTressSandwhich User ID: 73896382 United States 02/03/2017 11:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | it's amazing how many of you jerkoffs have no idea how our government works. Courts can declare an executive order illegal or unconstitutional. Quoting: coyotes 72352042 The most amusing, or egregious, part, is that a lot the people in this thread seem to think they are "conservative." The FEDERAL judge, in this matter, is attempting to uphold an actual conservative viewpoint by attending to the actual U.S. Constitution, not some stupid "order" made up by Mr. Blown Away in the popular vote. Do they still teach Checks and Balances in the civics classes you kids facebook/snapchat through? Hey ASSWIPE...thats what " liberal" FEDERAL judges were doing when states like Texas were trying to enforce immagration laws at a state level and were told to stop because it was a federal mandate. Yes, exactly. Lord, I am becoming Mr. Hand in Fast Times at Ridgemont High. FEDERAL LAW "trumps" state law. CONSTITUTION trumps all. When Mr. Conservative Judge says, "No likey, may not be CONSTITUTIONAL," he is suggesting ultimate stakes, to be decided by the PARENTS. MAYBE EVEN GRANDMA AND GRANDPA. We will all to be told to go play in the yard while they talk. What is actually happening here is surprisingly normal in our country, a federal judge is helping fast track this sucker to the Supreme Court where it inevitably has to go. You all should calm down. This is the country at work. Look at it this way, if Agent Orange wins, which he very likely will, he will be validated and emboldened. From your Trumpian perspective, this is little stay is not at all a bad thing. It is certainly not sedition. It's actually kinda cool how shit gets decided. Our Constitution is not a death warrant. We don't have to let killers or jihadist enter or ANYONE for that matter. It's up to the Feds how immigration law is enforced and who gets in or who can stay. This was NOT an Unconstitutional or illegal EO and will be enforced in a short time. Whats important is why don't you want your Gov keeping undesirables from entering the country? From the author of Blade Runner: “There will come a time when it isn't 'They're spying on me through my phone' anymore. Eventually, it will be 'My phone is spying on me'.” Philip K. Dick |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73191315 United States 02/03/2017 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73668594 United States 02/03/2017 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think he loses though because he did not include Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58820811 Saudi Arabia.. that was a mistake Yes. If he really wanted to pin this on "terrorist threat" he needed to include a couple of countries more directly linked to terrorism and probably at least one country that is not majority Muslim. And, just cause the Obama-ites had some list of "bad countries" doesn't help a lot. Previous poor logic by others is not a good legal argument. I still think it's likely the EO is upheld in the end, only because the President does have a lot of discretion over this type of thing. It's the religious aspect, however, that could be the undoing. I wonder if Rudy G. will get deposed and god knows what he will say. These are fascinating and rather entertaining times. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73744010 United States 02/03/2017 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | it's amazing how many of you jerkoffs have no idea how our government works. Courts can declare an executive order illegal or unconstitutional. Quoting: coyotes 72352042 The most amusing, or egregious, part, is that a lot the people in this thread seem to think they are "conservative." The FEDERAL judge, in this matter, is attempting to uphold an actual conservative viewpoint by attending to the actual U.S. Constitution, not some stupid "order" made up by Mr. Blown Away in the popular vote. Do they still teach Checks and Balances in the civics classes you kids facebook/snapchat through? Hey ASSWIPE...thats what " liberal" FEDERAL judges were doing when states like Texas were trying to enforce immagration laws at a state level and were told to stop because it was a federal mandate. Yes, exactly. Lord, I am becoming Mr. Hand in Fast Times at Ridgemont High. FEDERAL LAW "trumps" state law. CONSTITUTION trumps all. When Mr. Conservative Judge says, "No likey, may not be CONSTITUTIONAL," he is suggesting ultimate stakes, to be decided by the PARENTS. MAYBE EVEN GRANDMA AND GRANDPA. We will all to be told to go play in the yard while they talk. What is actually happening here is surprisingly normal in our country, a federal judge is helping fast track this sucker to the Supreme Court where it inevitably has to go. You all should calm down. This is the country at work. Look at it this way, if Agent Orange wins, which he very likely will, he will be validated and emboldened. From your Trumpian perspective, this is little stay is not at all a bad thing. It is certainly not sedition. It's actually kinda cool how shit gets decided. Please don't ever try to be funny again. |
Tobie User ID: 73893482 United States 02/03/2017 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73896143 United States 02/03/2017 11:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think he loses though because he did not include Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58820811 Saudi Arabia.. that was a mistake Trunp loses nothing. He has the authority to vett foreign nationals. Why would assholes want to deny the President power to protect our country from jihadist? Oh, yeah. This country is filled with druggie assholes and shit for brains who even now are threatening to burn down their own cities. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73896143 United States 02/03/2017 11:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73439099 United States 02/03/2017 11:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hadriana User ID: 70359964 United States 02/03/2017 11:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, now we know where to put all the Syrians we have to take. President Trump can put them ALL in welcoming Seattle. Last Edited by Hadriana on 02/03/2017 11:07 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63553160 United Kingdom 02/03/2017 11:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68662651 United States 02/03/2017 11:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11376882 United States 02/03/2017 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lampshades and Soap User ID: 23619754 United States 02/03/2017 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Yes I Did !! User ID: 73895229 United States 02/03/2017 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am sure this judge forgot about that pesky document called the "patriot act" which in 2005 was passed. Sure president trump by morning will have this all figured out. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73439099 I don't understand why the uproar over President Trump doing EXACTLY what Bill Clinton and Obama both said they would do ?? WTF ? Why the double standard ???? Last Edited by Yes I Did !! on 02/03/2017 11:10 PM "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly." Albert Einstein. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73668594 United States 02/03/2017 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73668594 The most amusing, or egregious, part, is that a lot the people in this thread seem to think they are "conservative." The FEDERAL judge, in this matter, is attempting to uphold an actual conservative viewpoint by attending to the actual U.S. Constitution, not some stupid "order" made up by Mr. Blown Away in the popular vote. Do they still teach Checks and Balances in the civics classes you kids facebook/snapchat through? Hey ASSWIPE...thats what " liberal" FEDERAL judges were doing when states like Texas were trying to enforce immagration laws at a state level and were told to stop because it was a federal mandate. Yes, exactly. Lord, I am becoming Mr. Hand in Fast Times at Ridgemont High. FEDERAL LAW "trumps" state law. CONSTITUTION trumps all. When Mr. Conservative Judge says, "No likey, may not be CONSTITUTIONAL," he is suggesting ultimate stakes, to be decided by the PARENTS. MAYBE EVEN GRANDMA AND GRANDPA. We will all to be told to go play in the yard while they talk. What is actually happening here is surprisingly normal in our country, a federal judge is helping fast track this sucker to the Supreme Court where it inevitably has to go. You all should calm down. This is the country at work. Look at it this way, if Agent Orange wins, which he very likely will, he will be validated and emboldened. From your Trumpian perspective, this is little stay is not at all a bad thing. It is certainly not sedition. It's actually kinda cool how shit gets decided. Our Constitution is not a death warrant. We don't have to let killers or jihadist enter or ANYONE for that matter. It's up to the Feds how immigration law is enforced and who gets in or who can stay. This was NOT an Unconstitutional or illegal EO and will be enforced in a short time. Whats important is why don't you want your Gov keeping undesirables from entering the country? This is a great question and I really appreciate it. The Constitution is, to an extent, meant to uphold life and security, but its mainly just a legal contract about how we run the place. Its kinda neutral. I personally look at it this way: motor vehicles are far, far more deadly to Americans than "terrorists." And, unfortunately, a lot of "terrorists" are deranged Americans who I believe use politics or religion to cover up their own depravity. So, I say, let's protect ourselves from crazies regardless of their religions and above all keep them from driving. Seriously, life is rather dangerous. Do you want to ban cars? The stats support this far more than they do any ban on ... Syrians...or whatever. Both sides of our current political swamp distort shit left and right to keep us worked up over things that in the end don't make that much actual difference. Now, I would big time support a jobs program. I want the Prez to unleash the GREATEST ONE WE'VE EVER SEEN. |
Bub User ID: 73540052 United States 02/03/2017 11:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73829528 United States 02/03/2017 11:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73896143 United States 02/03/2017 11:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think he loses though because he did not include Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58820811 Saudi Arabia.. that was a mistake Yes. If he really wanted to pin this on "terrorist threat" he needed to include a couple of countries more directly linked to terrorism and probably at least one country that is not majority Muslim. And, just cause the Obama-ites had some list of "bad countries" doesn't help a lot. Previous poor logic by others is not a good legal argument. I still think it's likely the EO is upheld in the end, only because the President does have a lot of discretion over this type of thing. It's the religious aspect, however, that could be the undoing. I wonder if Rudy G. will get deposed and god knows what he will say. These are fascinating and rather entertaining times. The EO is legal. Why assholes want to second guess a man trying to prevent jihad in America is beyond me. Its like you are dealing with 60 million democrates who never heard of Europe and could give a flying fuck about Europe, and think somehow they will live forever in a country that they only care about when it gives them what they want. I know you expect to live to a ripe old age. But check again. Stupid people or a stupid country can be eliminated over night. No guarantees. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73744010 United States 02/03/2017 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68561132 Spain 02/03/2017 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23619754 United States 02/03/2017 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think he loses though because he did not include Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58820811 Saudi Arabia.. that was a mistake Yes. If he really wanted to pin this on "terrorist threat" he needed to include a couple of countries more directly linked to terrorism and probably at least one country that is not majority Muslim. And, just cause the Obama-ites had some list of "bad countries" doesn't help a lot. Previous poor logic by others is not a good legal argument. I still think it's likely the EO is upheld in the end, only because the President does have a lot of discretion over this type of thing. It's the religious aspect, however, that could be the undoing. I wonder if Rudy G. will get deposed and god knows what he will say. These are fascinating and rather entertaining times. The EO is legal. Why assholes want to second guess a man trying to prevent jihad in America is beyond me. Its like you are dealing with 60 million democrates who never heard of Europe and could give a flying fuck about Europe, and think somehow they will live forever in a country that they only care about when it gives them what they want. I know you expect to live to a ripe old age. But check again. Stupid people or a stupid country can be eliminated over night. No guarantees. The reason is White genocide, he brews entire existence depends on it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21337117 United States 02/03/2017 11:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Alan Dershowitz CNN - If Trump refuses to abide by today's court ruling, he could be held in contempt. The constitution provides for that and in worst case scenario Trump could be imprisoned. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24076418 How funny. Dershowitz is using mighty big words for a pedophile. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68151674 United States 02/03/2017 11:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63398659 United States 02/03/2017 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am sure this judge forgot about that pesky document called the "patriot act" which in 2005 was passed. Sure president trump by morning will have this all figured out. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73439099 Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 SEC. 306. RESTRICTION ON ISSUANCE OF VISAS TO NONIMMIGRANTS FROM COUNTRIES THAT ARE STATE SPONSORS OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM. (a) IN GENERAL - No nonimmigrant visa under section 101(a)(15) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.1101(a)(15)) shall be issued to any alien from a country that is a state sponsor of international terrorism unless the Secretary of State determines, in consultation with the Attorney General and the heads of other appropriate United States agencies, that such alien does not pose a threat to the safety or national security of the United States. In making a determination under this sub-section, the Secretary of State shall apply standards developed by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Attorney General and the heads of other appropriate United States agencies, that are applicable to the nationals of such states. [link to www.gpo.gov (secure)] |