HOLY SHIT!!! Police keeping David Seaman safe. Shits going down. 2 patrol cars outside of my apartment. Guess they feel the threats against me ar

They needed him to remain a Senator to vote for Betsy Devos..... otherwise with one less Republican Senator they would not have enough votes to confirm her.

She is confirmed now withe tie breaker vote cast by VP Mike Pence.

Sessions should be starting very soon.

Has anyone considered the possibility that the cops outside his dwelling are actually there to murder him?

Well he hasnt posted now for 5hours......

Last post said his life hs become very tarantino esque

I hope hes ok

What if u are right?
What cananyone really do?

NOW, LET'S JUST CALM DOWN HERE...THE SOUTHPARK VIDEO IS FUNNY...AND IM NOT ACHILD FUCKER...

IVE BEEN SUPPORTING THIS G.D. THREAD WITH 5 STARS AND BUMPS ALL FUCKING NIGHT AND PIN REQUESTS...SO U SUCK IT BUDDY...!

Ummmm.....

Shit DAVID SEAMAN

Red Alert!!

his wikipedia page was requested to be Deleted!!

Check
This out!!

This could be bad news


[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]
From wikipedia- comment..?
"I've got no idea how to use Wikipedia from an editing perspective, nor do I care about learning as I have seen these sorts of things happen before, and it usually ends up with someone's Wikipedia knowledge being used to settle such debates and delete stuff, rather than an actual merit of the article in question. Just wanted to say this time I am watching with huge interest and would rather be anonymous and with proxy as I don't want to reveal my account name and donations history to Wikipeida (which is how I normally contribute). Of course now with David Seaman having 114,468 subscribers • 10,577,812 views when in October he had 6 million views mean it is very interesting how much more notable he is becoming and I am also interested how a user with the name "Neutrality" is anything but in the way he has reduced the info in the article in question. Now this comment isn't signed, it's probably going to get labelled with some acronym I don't care about, I just wanted my point made as a donator to Wikipedia who will not donate ever again just depending on what happens here. This comment is in the history here, and until history can be uninvented that's all I really care about. Thanks for reading. Will try and sign. 181.20.69.111 (talk) 00:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC) — 181.20.69.111 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep - as I said above I only know how to donate to Wikipedia, but encoruage all to write "Keep" because they will use their knowledge of Wikipedia to say this page has 1 neutral and 1 Delete if you don't write Keep. At least I hope it is Keep I need to write. Not sure, as I said I only know how to donate. Perhaps user "Neutrality" if he really is as his name states, perhaps he/she can tell me how I am officially supposed to state that I do not want this article deleted? Thanks. 181.20.69.111 (talk) 01:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC) — 181.20.69.111 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Note - Articles for Deletion Discussions are not a vote - it doesn't matter how many people say Keep or Delete - These discussions are about Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and the Guidelines for Biographies of Living Persons. Encouraging random, non-logged-in editors to say "Keep" just undermines whatever points you're trying to make. You'd be better off having just one person making a reasoned, balanced argument. Getting people to come here and blindly say "we should keep this article" will, eventually, not achieve anything. Exemplo347 (talk) 02:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Yet another journalist who by simply discussing factual information (Wikileaks) has been disproportionately slandered by the mainstream media in an attempt to cover up the truth. The jumbled up mess of a paragraph above shows just how the people of the world who bury their head in the sand will try to, with their idiocy, silence the voices of others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.127.235.105 (talk) 00:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC) — 74.127.235.105 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Political censorship77.40.137.107 (talk) 00:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC) — 77.40.137.107 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The article should not be deleted or redacted. Its being called into question is untimely at best and suspicious at worst. His firing from Huffington Post is justification enough for the article's continued existence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdrichtmyer (talk • contribs) 00:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC) — Pdrichtmyer (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
I also donate regularly to Wikipedia and have been involved in projects with prolific Wikipedians. Anonymous here for obvious reasons. I think it is interesting that this journalist has become more notable recently, and is very well respected as someone who is bravely doing the job the rest of the media should be doing, and it's NOW there's a suggestion for deletion? That makes it appear that there is a concerted effort to reduce his visibility to silence his message, which makes it appear that there is a cover up occurring of the most horrific crimes. I don't think Wikipedia wants to be associated with that. I think this journalist needs to have a more substantial article, he has expertise on cryptocurrency also, and has been interviewed about that on the Bitcoin website. That article also states: "He has been a guest on CNN Headline News, FOX News, ABC News Digital, Coast to Coast, the Joe Rogan Experience Podcast, The Young Turks and elsewhere. His opinions and articles frequently appear in Business Insider and Huffington Post." That was in July 2016, and his following has almost doubled since then on YouTube, and he is one of the most prominent people on up and coming Twitter alternative 'Gab'. His article should be made more substantial, and certainly not deleted.82.221.102.36 (talk) — 82.221.102.36 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

And yet nobody wants to pin the great threads about it

as a lesson in observation

glp makes for fertile ground

if you stand back and watch the patterns

but one needs a strong stomach and a resolute heart when those patterns start emerging

makes you realise how deep the tendrils go

fair is foul .. by and large

He really is starting to look unhinged...

All these pedophiles must die.

The arrests will likely begin as soon as Sessions is sworn in.

I keep telling people that do not understand how liberals can be supportive of Islam. The link is Pedophilia

Put a gun in your mouth and pull the trigger, babyfucker

seaman..

controlled gatekeeper.

I think OP should change title to Possibly
police NOT there to keep him safe?



Hmmm...Why didnt he Call the Police station and ASK why they were there???

Yeah, there is something a little "off" about David but I don't think it's nefarious and I do think he means well. Obviously, he really cares about Pizzagate. I'll never forget the very first video I saw of David's...it was the very beginning and he was clearly upset, explaining what Pizzagate was all about and he started gagging (as in, going to throw up). He had to stop and apologize and I thought "Shiiiit, this dude's upset!"

Then, it was odd and kinda funny how, when YouTube cut his ads off so he couldn't monetize, he was so mad that he made a video flat out asking everyone who subscribes to cough up some cash and send it to his PayPal - and they did! Something like $3500 in two days and then PayPal froze that account...he was pissed.

But as for him working hard, what does he really do? Does he hit the pavement? There are lots of Pizzagate people taking risks right now. They better all be careful. The cabal has killed for less.

Maybe those cops out front aren't "protecting" him at all!

creepy, creepy stuff there. Dude you spook me. Good Girl is right time to put the armor of God on.