Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,537 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 31,940
Pageviews Today: 44,877Threads Today: 8Posts Today: 210
12:22 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

What's the worst part about an EMP attack?

 
Booger Cancer  (OP)

User ID: 13299994
United States
02/24/2017 10:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What's the worst part about an EMP attack?
The weapon in question: Boeing's "CHAMP," short for Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project. It's essentially the old nuclear electromagnetic pulse weapon that we used to worry so much about -- but without the nuclear part. CHAMP carries a small generator that emits microwaves to fry electronics with pinpoint accuracy. It targets not nations or cities but individual buildings, blacking out their electronics rather than blowing up physical targets (or people).

the worst part being 70% of the US population dead in 100 days.
 Quoting: Southern Man 72905704


With no water in a few days, fires everywhere, and people pooping outside, probably 90% or more would die in a week or two.

I don't see anyone surviving it. Survive when there are dead, dehydrated bodies everywhere?

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 02/24/2017 10:09 PM
Yes, I did cure my Stage 4 cancer in two weeks when I was 48. I also reversed my chronic kidney disease (glomerulonephritis) when I was 25. In neither case were any medical treatments involved.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73375504
United States
02/24/2017 10:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What's the worst part about an EMP attack?
The weapon in question: Boeing's "CHAMP," short for Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project. It's essentially the old nuclear electromagnetic pulse weapon that we used to worry so much about -- but without the nuclear part. CHAMP carries a small generator that emits microwaves to fry electronics with pinpoint accuracy. It targets not nations or cities but individual buildings, blacking out their electronics rather than blowing up physical targets (or people).

the worst part being 70% of the US population dead in 100 days.
 Quoting: Southern Man 72905704


With no water in a few days, fires everywhere, and people pooping outside, probably 90% or more would die in a week or two.

I don't see anyone surviving it. Survive when there are dead, dehydrated bodies everywhere?
 Quoting: Booger Cancer


There are ways. Having water stored until you can restore a supply, having an alternate way to pump water, having seeds and having a garden set up. Not being in a place where a fire in one house will adversely affect my own. Being able to have an open flame without it becoming out of control.

Yeah, it's asking a lot but I could do it tomorrow.
Booger Cancer  (OP)

User ID: 13299994
United States
02/24/2017 10:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What's the worst part about an EMP attack?
The weapon in question: Boeing's "CHAMP," short for Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project. It's essentially the old nuclear electromagnetic pulse weapon that we used to worry so much about -- but without the nuclear part. CHAMP carries a small generator that emits microwaves to fry electronics with pinpoint accuracy. It targets not nations or cities but individual buildings, blacking out their electronics rather than blowing up physical targets (or people).

the worst part being 70% of the US population dead in 100 days.
 Quoting: Southern Man 72905704


With no water in a few days, fires everywhere, and people pooping outside, probably 90% or more would die in a week or two.

I don't see anyone surviving it. Survive when there are dead, dehydrated bodies everywhere?
 Quoting: Booger Cancer


There are ways. Having water stored until you can restore a supply, having an alternate way to pump water, having seeds and having a garden set up. Not being in a place where a fire in one house will adversely affect my own. Being able to have an open flame without it becoming out of control.

Yeah, it's asking a lot but I could do it tomorrow.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73375504


If you don't have a house you can walk to or bike to lined up like that already, the chances of you getting one are slim and none. Slim has already left town.

Getting to and from your water source day after day without getting mugged as you carry gallons of water would be another trick.

Is your garden already set up at this house you speak about. Is there food growing or will you have to wait for it to be ready to eat? Who will watch the garden 24/7 to protect it from hungry thieves?

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 02/24/2017 10:26 PM
Yes, I did cure my Stage 4 cancer in two weeks when I was 48. I also reversed my chronic kidney disease (glomerulonephritis) when I was 25. In neither case were any medical treatments involved.





GLP