there might be a manned flight to the moon in 2018

The Apolla astronauts saw UFO's on the moon, and strange buildings.

So maybe some of them went there anyway, but not with 60's technology, but maybe some tech aqcuired from the Greys from Zeta Reticuli.

There has never been a manned flight to the moon and there never will be.

All the chatter to make it sound legit

It's never going to happen.

It hasn't happened in 50 years....because they've got all the tards believing their lies

hoagland, is that you?

Derp

If he pulls that off in the time available, which I doubt, it will be a huge embarrassment to NASA. They have lost the plot.

Last Edited by Katipo on 03/07/2017 05:12 AM

Its a real shame Nasa,Northrop Grumman Corporation and every single other body involed in the moon landing have lost every single drawing, concept art data tape or even a paper clip of the machines used in the moon landings.
It would have been usefull to people doing it nowday.

LOL

Publicity stunt.

FAILon Musk can't even fly humans to the Space Station. He does not have the proper equipment for this.

If he can at least take astronauts to the ISS in 2018 he will be lucky.

I would go with the Russians. No risk with Soyuz.

FailX

meh

Seems pointless. There's nothing up there. Nothing to mine or harvest - net waste of resources.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

It's pretty darn weird that we can have gigapixel views of places on Earth with super massive resolutions or goggle Earth satellites showing us every inch of the planet in detail but when it comes too the moon all you get is 1950's blurry fuzzy BS that doesn't show sh*t.

Shouldn't this be a no-brainer for them? Other than not blowing their rocket up on the pad of course. This is 50 year old technology that presumably North Korea could be close to doing. Who knows, maybe they will get some star pictures this time with all of the advancements in digital photography. We do have the tech now to put the stars exactly where they should be in any real time video.

Are their names Clinton by any chance? Might be the furthest place they can run to soon lol

Becauae there is nothing there and it was a waste of time and money.

Why are aliens running out of food?

Send Michal Moore and Amy Schumer , enough meat on those two that will feed the aliens for a couple of months.

H3

How was that conclusion drawn from only having landed on an enormous planetary body six times (for only a few hours each time)? That's like the Spanish coming back from the New World and saying, "Nothing over there worth going back for."

Great. We can bring back more souveneer dust at a cost of billions.

Wrong. NASA's budget post Apollo is anything but massive. Guess what percent of the federal budget goes to NASA. Guess what it was at the peak of Apollo. In the 48 years since the Apollo program, no one has successfully launched a rocket as powerful as the Saturn V. That is the number one reason why no one else has attempted to go to the Moon. The heavy-lift rocket used by the Apollo program has not been surpassed by any flown rocket so far. And unlike the SpaceX design, the Saturn V was completely expendable and only usable one time. That method was seen as unsustainable which is why the space shuttle was selected since it was to be reusable for the most part.

Unfortunately reusability turned out to be more expensive than anticipated due to some of the design decisions involved in the space shuttle program. Most notably, placing a fragile reusable heat shield next to a cryogenic tank at launch turned out to be expensive and ultimately deadly. Not having a launch abort system also turned out to be deadly. And since this vehicle was only designed to go to Lil work for bit that is where we stayed for the duration of an entire manned spaceflight program. Some would say that the space shuttle was a mistake. It certainly failed to deliver on the promised prove tag per flight, due to the extensive overhaul it required after each flight. It also kept us in low earth orbit for its 30-year life span. That was not up to NASA to decide either. That decision was political as it always is.

My own conclusion on this has nothing to do with science or technology or if you believe a giant barrier prevents us from reaching the moon. Without an insurance underwriter for both transport system and payload, this launch will be a 'no-go." Our space exploration programs will forever be limited by lawyers and insurance companies.

Its a real shame that you lie about this. The drawings and schematics still exist. Just because they may not be online so you couldn't find them in the 2 seconds of research you barely bothered to do, doesn't mean they don't exist. But hoaxies gotta lie.