Sandy Hook: CSP Lt. DelVecchia: "Chaos...ambulances could not enter the school grounds."

The failures in emergency response have nothing to do with either of those cases.

Present what case? This is a conspiracy site. We post furiously about perceived treachery and unseemly motives.

In the scenario of a drill there is no case to be made. Just a statement of perception based on a very very bad story with a shoddy investigation...and horrible news articles. Andrew Solomon pretty much cemented that. That dude single handedly provided all the info I needed to make up my mind.


Now of course Zeph has it figured that police were firing their weapons and hitting everything in site and while dispatchers decided that ambulances were needed then were not but the road was clogged...but it did not matter because helicopters and ambulances would not have been needed because heart monitors put to rest any need for serious evacuations of victims while a couple of lone cops rushed a few wounded to hospitals themselves.. Although first responders were escorted in under the watchful eye of Newtown's finest to provide care...er...heart monitors.

Anyway.

Urban Legend of Sandy Hook.

They weren't scared to confront him; they had a shootout with him.

Police fired so many bullets that they signed statements saying they had been afraid they'd run out of ammunition.

Shooting lasted until at least 9:52 am or so.

LOTS of late shots in the 911 and dashcam audio.

Unfortunately, one (or possibly several) of those shots struck children.

But it would expose it, isn't that what you want?

Imagine the pressure of having to keep everything under wraps.

Very well put.

Suppressing the truth is like trying to keep 100 beach balls under water; you can only last so long and then the beach balls win.

Well that was a bit lawyerly for me but I get the gist of it.

Controlling information is the key but so is how the "evidence" is presented.

Audio. Notice no witness saw anything but they heard noises. Everybody hears things differently....

Disseminate narrative drivers as minor bits of info planted in larger human interest stories.

Fortunately for our democracy, while news networks might care mightily about public interest, courts don't give a damn lol.

Courts are always interested.

So how do you prove spoilation of evidence when all the evidence is witness statements and selective recordings?

Chain of custody is signed off on, as is the condition of the 911 calls (unabridged, contiguous, genuine).

However the only extant files are abridged and segmented.

Even more damning is the "automatic" filenames assigned to each "call."

That has to be manually created (i.e. manually tampered with).

It would take about 10 minutes to present this particular issue clearly to a judge, jury, or arbitrator, now that the 911 calls have been reconstructed (with missing audio very obvious).

It would matter, if the other children were declared dead already. But like I said, the ambulances could not be near the school until the scene was cleared and deemed safe. By that time the kids were dead and the two wounded were gotten to in time. Things like that happen at mass casualty events.

I know you're trying to say that the ambulances were blocked, so they couldn't get to the kids. But that had to be done for safety reasons.

The damn school was torn down without one damn picture of anything. Pictures of columbine and other shootings abound. I always call that a clue.

The damn school was torn down without one damn picture of anything. Pictures of columbine and other shootings abound. I always call that a clue.

Most people in the world do not want to photos of dead 6 year olds

Most people in the world do not want to photos of dead 6 year olds

We don't need photos of deceased people to "prove" Sandy Hook any more than we need them to prove a tragic local car accident.

Photos were always a red herring.

Audio is more important than photos; it tells a story very clearly, gives tones of voice, sequence of events, echoes of gunshots--it is also important for what is NOT there, the missing pieces cut out by the lead defense lawyer (er, State's Attorney).

Exposing the perjury and other felonies committed by those involved with the Sandy Hook response is not just important for the case of Sandy Hook itself; it is important as a way to tear down the many, many layers of corruption inherent to the Connecticut judicial system.

NO! The "lack" of photos was always the red herring shill....

And you know it. Zeph you become more transparent each and every post you make over these last 4-5 years. You are by intent steering into the wrong direction. It is too obvious now for all of us that have been following this scam. I pray you too will be prosecuted when the truth come forward, to the fullest extent I hope.....

Your distractions and lies will be accounted for.