TR-3B....Real or fiction?

Tinypic works well for pictures.

No I'm aware, but it's not a dirigible. In 1995 two projects came about that make this craft possible.
1. Dr, Ning Li, made a superconductor disc at ROOM temperature, that would create the Bose-Einstein Effect, where all atoms spin in unison. This creates artificial gravity waves. It required 5kw of electricity to do it. She said you could float a bowling ball over it. Add power it goes up, reduce power it comes down.
2. A joint effort to reduce Russia's plutonium stockpile resulted in LHMCR, a melt down proof reactor, that burned up the specially coated fuel (no waste). It was modular in design and produced 5 KW of electricity. Liquid helium cooled. Almost like a breeder reactor.

Add these two items together, and you have how the TR-3B can fly without wings, noise, or anything you would expect from a normal aircraft.

Now consider one more thing, it's a proven fact that gravity alters time. So when the change in power to the disc happens, their time changes, not yours. So they just fly away normally, but you see them blink out.

Do you understand it yet?

Search "taming gravity" and the LHMCR. You'll see.

Or maybe it was called MLHCR for modular liquid helium cooled reactor, sorry it's been years.

I have both document in .doc form.

Thank You!!!

You're an idiot. They keep the first stealth fighter secret for almost 15 years before Iraq. When most people got the first view of it in action.

Don't be so dim witted.

Your welcome, reactor document link [link to www.filedropper.com]

Superconductor link
[link to www.filedropper.com]

Dr. Ning Li disappeared right after she created this superconductor. I'm sure she was grabbed up by some black budget operation to build a bigger one.
Since you can daisy chain the reactors for more power, I don't see any limit.

Imagine flying that giant triangle craft that now weigh nothing. Even small jets could push it around with ease.
The proof would be in the tails seen on the one filmed over France, CLASSIC Northrop tails. The way it bugs out in the video, shows you gravity is changing.

These ships were around long before Iraq...asswipe...

I took vid of something I've been seeing in the sky every day for at least a year. It's not the ISS or Venus. May be a chinese satellite. The second video is better. I took it with a cell phone, and although I could see all the stars, my phone couldn't. It did capture this- because it's bright as fuck. It had been appearing to the West North West the entire year around dusk but as soon as I posted to this thread it moved to the S- SE. LOL right. Last night I recorded it about 11:30 PM and it is usually gone by then. It wasn't there at 11 and at 11:30pm it was bright as fuck. I'm not lying, but me and the wife are the only ones that know that. 3/14 W-NW at dusk, 3/15 it was almost due south at 9pm, 3/16 it appeared at 11:30 pm S-SE. I'm not saying what it is. I live in Waco TX and this was recorded at 31.536281, -97.182412
[link to tinypic.com]
[URL= [link to tinypic.com] My Video[/URL]

2nd vid
[link to tinypic.com]
[URL= [link to tinypic.com] My Video[/URL]

What angle, off the horizon, did you see this object. I live in Oklahoma and have a good South view and can see objects about 10 degrees off the horizon.

Last Edited by DuckNCover on 03/17/2017 09:06 PM

Yes, I saw one hover over my garden in the night sky maybe 5/6 years ago now, it was massive, I thought I was seeing stars move till I worked out it was a massive triangle lighted on each point hovering silently over then it passed and was gone.
I am in no doubt I wasn't seeing anything that was not there

Xx

30-40 degrees

Moon is rising now and it will track into where it was last night. It's not out right now. I'll try to remember to post later. Direction from me and all that. A guy on another thread said it was a new gps satellite so heads up. I responded that it couldn't be because it's stationary. If I ever run across a nightvision security cam or cam, I'll get it, because you never know. It's interesting no matter what it turns out to be.

I don't know if this checks out or not, but this pasted document seems to be proof of the tech anyway:

From: John Kooiman

Subject: TR-3B Antigravity Physics Explained:

To be correct, I probably should say, "TR-3B Antigravity Physics
Explained, insofar as General Relativity can be considered an
explanation for gravity."

Many readers of this list are probably already familiar with Edgart. If not,
read about it here: [link to fouchemedia.com]

Mr. Fouche describes the TR-3B's propulsion system as follows:
"A circular, plasma filled accelerator ring called the Magnetic Field
Disrupter, surrounds the rotatable crew compartment and is far ahead
of any imaginable technology... The plasma, mercury based, is
pressurized at 250,000 atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees
Kelvin, and accelerated to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive
plasma with the resulting gravity disruption.

The MFD generates a magnetic vortex field, which disrupts or
neutralizes the effects of gravity on mass within proximity, by 89
percent...

The current MFD in the TR-3B causes the effect of making the vehicle
extremely light, and able to outperform and outmaneuver any craft yet
...My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that
the human pilots can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along
with the 89% reduction in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%.
The crew of the TR-3B should be able to comfortable take up to 40Gs...
Reduced by 89%, the occupants would feel about 4.2 Gs.

The TR-3Bs propulsion is provided by 3 multimode thrusters mounted at
each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach
9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet - then who
knows how fast it can go!..."

I was skeptical of Mr. Fouche's claims when I first read them, as I'
m sure that many of you are, but I was interested enough to do further
research on what happens when you spin a plasma at high speeds in a
ring (toroidal) configuration. I came across a physics article (sorry,
I can't seem to locate the source right now) that described this
exact configuration. The article said that, surprisingly, the charged
particles of the plasma don't just spin uniformly around the ring,
but they tend to take up a synchronized, tightly pitched, helical
(screw thread) motion as they move around the ring. This can be
understood in a general way as follows: the charged particles moving
around the ring act as a current that in turn sets up a magnetic field
around the ring. It is a well-known fact that electrons (or ions) tend
to move in a helical fashion around magnetic field lines. Although it
is a highly complex interaction, it only requires a small leap of
faith to believe that the end result of these interactions between the
moving charged particles (current) and associated magnetic fields
results in the helical motion described above. In other words, the
charged particles end up moving in very much the same pattern as the
current on a wire tightly wound around a toroidal core.

I thought that this was an interesting fact, but didn't see how it
could possibly relate to antigravity, until I ran across the following
article: "Guidelines to Antigravity" by Dr. Robert Forward, written in
1962 (available at:
[link to www.whidbey.com] Dr. Forward's
article describes several little known aspects of Einstein's General
Relativity Theory that indicate how moving matter can create unusual
gravitational effects. When I saw Figure 5 in Dr. Forward's article,
the pieces of the puzzle all fell together. I instantly saw how the
moving matter pattern that Dr. Forward describes as necessary to
generate a gravitational dipole was exactly the same as the plasma
ring pattern described in the physics article discussed above!

If Fouche's description is even close to correct, then the TR-3B
utilizes this little known loophole in General Relativity Theory to
create it's antigravity effects! Even though the TR-3B can only
supposedly cancel 89% of gravity (and inertia) today, there is no
reason why the technology can't be improved to exceed 100% and
achieve true antigravity capability!

In theory, this same moving matter pattern could be mechanically
reproduced by mounting a bunch of small gyroscopes all around the
larger ring, with their axis on the larger ring, and then spinning
both the gyroscopes and the ring at high speeds. However, as Dr.
Forward points out any such mechanical system would probably fly apart
before any significant antigravity effects could be generated.

However, as Dr. Forward states, "By using electromagnetic forces to
contain rotating systems, it would be possible for the masses to reach
relativistic velocities; thus a comparatively small amount of matter,
if dense enough and moving fast enough, could produce usable
gravitational effects."

The requirement for a dense material moving at relativistic speeds
would explain the use of Mercury plasma (heavy ions). If the plasma
really spins at 50,000 RPM and the Mercury ions are also moving in a
tight pitched spiral, then the individual ions would be moving
probably hundreds, perhaps thousands of times faster than the bulk
plasma spin, in order to execute their "screw thread" motions. It is
quite conceivable that the ions could be accelerated to relativistic
speeds in this manner. I am guessing that you would probably want to
strip the free electrons from the plasma, making a positively charged
plasma, since the free electrons would tend to counter rotate and
reduce the efficiency of the antigravity device.

One of Einstein's postulates of GR says that gravitational mass and
inertial mass are equivalent. This is consistent with Mr. Fouche's
claim that inertial mass within the plasma ring is also reduced by
89%. This would also explain why the vehicle is triangular shaped.
Since it still requires conventional thrusters for propulsion, the
thrusters would need to be located outside of the "mass reduction
zone" or else the mass of the thruster's reaction material would also
be reduced, making them terribly inefficient. Since it requires a
minimum of 3 legs to have a stable stool, it follows that they would
need a minimum of 3 thrusters to have a stable aerospace platform.
Three thrusters, located outside of the plasma ring, plus appropriate
structural support, would naturally lead to a triangular shape for the
vehicle.

I was extremely skeptical of Mr. Fouche's claimed size for the TR-3B,
of 600 feet across. At first, I thought that this must be a typo. Why
would anyone in their right mind build a "Tactical Reconnaissance"
vehicle 2 football fields long? They must be nuts! However, the answer
to this may also be found in Dr. Forward's paper. As Dr. Forward's
puts it, "...even the most optimistic calculations indicate that very
large devices will be required to create usable gravitational forces.
Antigravity...like all modern sciences, will require special projects
involving large sums of money, men, and energy."

John Kooiman

This was on Above Tomato Soup close to ten years ago

what I thought was the moon was the glow of the city lights. I'm 100% amateur. It's up though SE of Waco, TX 40 degrees off the ground from my perspective. Do you see anything OK?