Why some believe the Earth is flat

i just debunked the whole thing holla at me when the power is out for 48 hours in amost all of north america and maybe then you could of seen what is saw

Some say we're in a bowl...so yes, we can curl up that way too.

But I already told you, you're no fun to play with - and I wasn't asking you anyhow. So it doesn't matter if it works for you or not.

So shoo!!

So the continents and islands are like cereal and the oceans are like milk.
Imagine the size of the kid that eats from this bowl.

What didn't you understand im my sentence: "But I don't go through a gish gallopp here, we can do it one by one - pick one."

.

Titan-ic?

They think it is flat because their fingers and toes are all they need to count up to their IQs.

Maybe it's Chtulu-ic!


Last Edited by Boris Dragosani on 03/22/2017 08:16 PM

Islam. It says so in the koran.

Chtulu isn't THAT big! LOL

But it sure could ruin your cheerios.

So end of the world can be located

Backdrop people cannot comprehend the vastness of God universes.

Remember almost 50% do not have a soul in this wicked generation.

Get the bot out !

Especially when you're the Cheerios.

If you have enough money, and the right connections, sure. But you won't be allowed to tell anyone.

True. So very true.

No comment on this in the other thread?



.

While I do not believe it's flat, I'm open to others perceptions. Why do you think it's flat? And what about the other planets, do you believe they are flat too? Why does a ship not fall off the edge of the Earth? I'm not mocking you, I just want to hear the justification. If it's convincing I may investigate further.

Which other thread? And do I have to repeat myself everywhere?


And yes, I saw that part. still doesn't cover processing and the dates and other info normally included on photographs. And where are the other photos? Processing data is REALLY important. They can do all kinds of things that effect the final picture. We have none of the information.

As I said, all the good "earth" pictures are ALWAYS missing key data to authenticate them. That's why we're still sitting at only THREE very hazy mega long distance pixel shots and a whole lotta enhanced and composite shots.

There is so much information available - my suggestion is to just start your own journey. Lots of theories, lots of videos, lots of reading. Spend an evening and just click around. Keep an open mind. Some stuff if more math oriented, some more science, some more esoteric & spritual. Others lay out the various theories. Follow what matches your interests best and just follow the tangents it takes you on. There's no right or wrong way down the rabbit hole.

Search for Flat Earth and pick a link. Have fun with it. It's really an intriguing trip. It WILL change the way you look at world. If not literally....it will figuratively.

Lol. That's why if you take out the by it becomes "Balonians."
The inquisition was run by Balonians.

Sorry, saw to late that you already had replied.



Processing doesn't matter - you can't make a globe from a flat earth by processing a film.
Dates are given in the link.
Other photos don't matter, one photo of the globe disproves the flat earth. - Btw.: You yourself gave a link to more Zond-7 photos in the other thread: [link to mentallandscape.com]

Other data?
* No NASA
* Film material, not digital
* No personal computers in 1969
* No Photoshop in 1969

.

I think flat earther's lack any critical thinking skills, and common fucking sense.
They say have an open mind, well some things aren't open to debate. 2+2=4 It's not open to debate and to try and debate it makes you a moron on the highest order.
Might as well debate there is no ice in Antarctica, it's really all mashed potatoes.Miles thick of mashed potatoes. Looks like creamy mashed potatoes. The Ice walls are the stiffer kind that peak up.

Last time.

There's all kinds of manipulation that can be done to photos in the processing. And there is ZERO proof that they were taken in space.

There's still plenty of debate of the moon landing from the same time and all the pictures that they took.

When the entire description of the these missions consists of 2 paragraphs each. And most of the pictures are missing. One whole missions worth of photos are damaged. Plus none of the processing data is available. There is just not enough factual data to call them proof of anything.

Again, every single time we have nice pictures of earth - there's something wrong with them. Lack of information, or their touched up in some way (filters, composite, colored, etc.). It's really frustrating. They take a picture of a damn oak leaf and we know every piece of data about it. Every camera setting, film, processor, processing equipment, distance from the lens, to it's precise gps coordinates, species sub-type, time of day, weather and things we don't even need to know. But a monumental event of a perfect picture of earth from outer space supposedly taken from a single camera? They can't even tell us which of the two days it was from? GRRRRR!!! Annoying!

So. Back to 3 worthless fuzzy pixels where they do at least provide the proper details.

Earth is flat. Here is the proof.

when Astro can't debunk it they delete the thread or block it
like this
Thread: Gyroscopes Proves Flat Earth - Case Closed !

Exactly. He can't debunk the fact rockets can't work in a vacuum either

The earth is like 2 contact lenses which turmoil and that is why it covers its own top layer cycling through transitions, pressures, exposures and time. The magnetic poles happen due to the cylinder affect of a bent flat surface. Byrd drew some ideas to explain.

Most people think black and white when this subject might be grey.

May be we have different perceptions about "processing".

Thus it would be nice, if you explain what kinds of manipulation can be done to photos in the processing.

.

Toy gyroscope, not enough mass. Take a 100 kg gyro and it will show earth rotation.

And what about ring laser gyroscopes?

.