Use of nuclear weapons

Users Online Now: 2,219 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 1,245,541
Pageviews Today: 2,079,538	Threads Today: 849	Posts Today: 14,840
07:52 PM

Page 1 Bottom Search Replies Previous Page Next Page
Search Terms: Highlight Matches
Use of nuclear weapons
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69481588 United States 03/26/2017 02:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Use of nuclear weapons I am reading about making use of nuclear weapons subject to some sort of vote and consensus. Does anybody actually believe that if things got so bad that they were actually needed, that an enemy would call time out so that we would have time to reach a consensus? This would be the perfect time window for them to strike us with everything they have. I would expect it immediately after we put the system in place. Any later and we might realize the opportunity that we had created. Buh-bye!

Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 69481588 United States 03/27/2017 12:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Use of nuclear weapons Will there be a nuclear war?
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46782651 United States 03/27/2017 12:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Use of nuclear weapons Awesome, mob rule/consensus thinking socilist societies should be destroyed. Why do you women vote for idiots because they said something they made them feel good?
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35156219 United States 03/27/2017 12:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Use of nuclear weapons I am reading about making use of nuclear weapons subject to some sort of vote and consensus. Does anybody actually believe that if things got so bad that they were actually needed, that an enemy would call time out so that we would have time to reach a consensus? This would be the perfect time window for them to strike us with everything they have. I would expect it immediately after we put the system in place. Any later and we might realize the opportunity that we had created. Buh-bye! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69481588 They need the humans (and the duality) to harvest the energy to run this simulation so they're not likely to do it. If they do it's like a self assured destruction deal; they do it because it doesn't matter for their survival at that point...they do it to "make it quick".
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69416817 United States 03/27/2017 06:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Use of nuclear weapons World peace is overrated.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72881814 France 03/27/2017 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Use of nuclear weapons No, the interdimensional intelligences in contact with Earth have not allowed humanity to go down that road. Nuclear silos have been known to malfunction unexpectedly. Higher intelligences have kindly intervened, and nuclear war on Earth will not happen.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69569670 United States 03/29/2017 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Use of nuclear weapons Nuclear war should always be on the table. The decision to "go" must not be slowed with red tape. Mere seconds make the difference in outcome. There are no outsiders magically protecting the world. Free will.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74133891 United States 03/29/2017 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Use of nuclear weapons Will there be a nuclear war? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69481588 I seriously doubt it. There's just no money in that kind of war. They make more $$ when doing conventional wars. Nukes take out infrastructure, which can't be replaced for a long time. The fallout would leave countries unable to build back up for too long. It's just not worth.
Page 1 Top Previous Page Next Page

Related Threads

GLP