Donald Trump is a Rothschild puppet. (I no longer believe this, but leaving post here anyway)

just go on an image search and use keywords trump clinton al smith dinner to see where the rabbit hole goes.

Yep you are correct.

Jeremiah 17:
5 Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.
6For he shall be like the heath in the desert, and shall not see when good cometh; but shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, in a salt land and not inhabited.
7Blessed is the man that trusteth in the LORD, and whose hope the LORD is.

Though even the sinners can be redeemed, he was speaking the right stuff also was running against one of the Americas most hated women. People just couldn't vote Hillary.

But keep trusting in the LORD:
Psalms 34:8
O taste and see that the LORD is good: blessed is the man that trusteth in him.

Psalms 84:12 O LORD of hosts, blessed is the man that trusteth in thee.

God already won this, now what must happen will happen.

It's a crying shame though that the guy apparently is not going to do what he said. That sucks.

Oh well they all get their rewards in the end.
What's more upsetting is Mike Pence this supposed hardcore Christian that is NOT doing any of the stuff he KNOWS he's supposed to do, instead doing the bidding of 666-Jared and others like that.

What happened to that guy?

We all knew Trump was a wild card, it just didn't play out as planned.

But what the hell happened to Mike Pence?

Avoid answering the question why dontcha.

Got that right...

Right, so if Trin has a view about Trump that you don't agree with then it's perfectly acceptable, but if anyone else is to hold that exact same view as Trin that's totally unacceptable and said poster is labelled by you as a shill. Gotcha.

Answered. But if you can't spell, you can't read.

:TPHspell:

I'm a staunch supporter of Trump and you're calling me a shill. So be it then.

How about giving a straight forward yes/no answer to this question though?

If someone were to as you put it 'articulate a thought reasonably' that showed Trump in a bad light, just like Trinity has done, would they meet your definition of a shill?

The problem I have is the racist and so called pro-American crowd who took Trump as a champion for nationalism or a more veiled attempt at establishing white supremacy in opposition to diversity.

There's no going back to the any former glory era that some whites want to be nostalgic about; more importantly in regards to a station in life where the playing field was less than ideal for those referred to as minorities.

So yes, divide and conquer is the oldest rick in the book.

White Americans, in their quest to hold firmly onto a perceived power which is an illusion at best are the cause for this.

They elected a man presumed to be for the people (white people).

Suckers.

Divide and conquer by racial means is the oldest ruse.

Oh look, you found another boyfriend. How cute.

Fucking liar! Here it is. From your OP thread of yesterday concerning percentage of white women on earth:

"A good-looking, HOT White woman is practically EXTINCT these days, and by the time they are 30, they are USED UP, and have been fucked up the ass by every Black guy in town."

Used up by their own making and decisions.

If they protect their chastity and cleanliness, then there is noting wrong with a woman over 30.

Bullshit. You are not a Trump supporter now or in the past, and you are a shill.

You have presented no reasonable or articulate fact or argument. You have only spouted shill BS.

Your question is therefore irrelevant.

I've no personal need to present any arguments denigrating Trump since I'm already in awe of his dazzling brillance. I'm sure you'd agree with me that Trump is doing a great job.

Meanwhile you seem afraid of answering this simple little yes/no question . Let's see if can pluck up the courage this time.

If someone were to as you put it 'articulate a thought reasonably' that showed Trump in a bad light, just like Trinity has done, would they meet your definition of a shill?

I didn't say it.

You accused me of being an ageist, of suggesting women are used up because of age, if they are over 30.

I don't believe that.

My point was entirely different: that they engage in so much extra-marital sex that they are used up by 30, by their own decision-making.

Audit the fed reserve gold

Bullshit. You are not a Trump supporter now or in the past, and you are a shill.

You have presented no reasonable or articulate fact or argument. You have only spouted shill BS.

Your question is therefore irrelevant.

Oh stop hitting on the men here fagboy. We are not into your fecal exploring. I am sure you'll do better at your local gay bar.

Again, already answered. Learn to read. Go back in the thread. Sound out the words. Get an adult to help if needed.

You never gave a yes or no answer to the question at any point in the thread, so let's try again shall we?

If someone were to as you put it 'articulate a thought reasonably' that showed Trump in a bad light, just like Trinity has done, would they meet your definition of a shill?

You never gave a yes or no answer to the question at any point in the thread, so let's try again shall we?

If someone were to as you put it 'articulate a thought reasonably' that showed Trump in a bad light, just like Trinity has done, would they meet your definition of a shill?

The answer required in your reply is either.

Option a) Yes

or

Option b) No


Awfully complicated and confusing for you to understand just a simple yes or no answer is required, but go ahead give it your best effort, we're all rooting for you buddy.

it's not you were saying before