carvings confirm how comet struck Earth in 10,950BC

:5stars1:



The earth is only 7,000 years old.

Ancient stone carvings confirm that a comet struck the Earth around 11,000BC, a devastating event which wiped out wooly mammoths and sparked the rise of civilisations.

Experts at the University of Edinburgh analysed mysterious symbols carved onto stone pillars at Gobekli Tepe in southern Turkey, to find out if they could be linked to constellations.

The markings suggest that a swarm of comet fragments hit Earth at the exact same time that a mini-ice age struck, changing the entire course of human history.

Scientists have speculated for decades that a comet could be behind the sudden fall in temperature during a period known as the Younger Dryas. But recently the theory appeared to have been debunked by new dating of meteor craters in North America where the comet is thought to have struck.

However when engineers studied animal carvings made on a pillar – known as the vulture stone – at Gobekli Tepe they discovered that the creatures were actually astronomical symbols which represented constellations and the comet.

The idea had been originally put forward by author Graham Hancock in his book Magicians of the Gods.

Way less than 50%

[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

---

Gobekli Tepe is amazing.

ROFL

5* OP

Do you realize how much knowledge we lost when the library at Alexandria was destroyed ?

Honestly, I have no idea how much knowledge we lost and that's my point.

When it was destroyed do was the information in it.

I am sure there is a lot of human history that we know little of.

Older and smarter than we give ourselves credit for.

:5stars1:



The earth is only 7,000 years old.

Skeletons have been unearthed that show operations that were successfully performed on the spine and the back of the neck that we even have difficulty performing today.

Maybe the legend of Atlantis is (somewhat) true ?

Bull shit

If they were close enough to see it or even know about it then they would be killed by it.

And they would have no idea if they hit elsewhere.

They had no FOX News back then, moron.

Krakatoa, or Krakatau (Indonesian: Krakatau), is a volcanic island situated in the Sunda Strait between the islands of Java and Sumatra in the Indonesian province of Lampung. The name is also used for the surrounding island group comprising the remnants of a much larger island of three volcanic peaks which was obliterated in a cataclysmic 1883 eruption, unleashing huge tsunamis (killing more than 36,000 people) and destroying over two-thirds of the island. The explosion is considered to be the loudest sound ever heard in modern history, with reports of it being heard up to 3,000 miles (4,800 km) from its point of origin. The shock waves from the explosion were recorded on barographs worldwide for days afterward.

---

They saw the streaks across the sky and then recorded the meteors and weather changes.

WE now are linking the two events together.

They didn't record the strikes. Reading comprehension is your friend.

Do you realize how much knowledge we lost when the library at Alexandria was destroyed ?

Honestly, I have no idea how much knowledge we lost and that's my point.

When it was destroyed do was the information in it.

I am sure there is a lot of human history that we know little of.

They "confirm" that it struck in the year 10950 bc.

They call it to they year and you idiots do not smell bs.

dummies

oh look


not too long ago researchers "confirmed" that the die off of that period was not caused by a comet

[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

confirmed idiots

oh look


not too long ago researchers "confirmed" that the die off of that period was not caused by a comet

[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

confirmed idiots

Your dumb link states......

"But scientists now claim to have disproved the controversial theory after finding
a key piece of evidence used to support the comet impact idea could have been created by a more mundane process."
[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

The new evidence of the Gobekli Tepe carvings now REFUTE THAT ARGUMENT and have provided evidence via documentation that it was in fact a Comet.
So much for your article....and that, now obsolete, "mundane" theory.

So who is the real idiot?

:failyou: :headnod12:

Very cool.

Can't wait for the next set of digs there.

Lol, so what constellations would that be? The same ones we have now? Because if were moving 483,000 miles per hour pretty sure after the fucking stars would have changed by now, thousands of years ago. Funny how only doom comes from fake ass space. Sheep porn

Here's "all the movement" of Polaris over about a half century of time. It's just barely detectable in old photographic sky surveys. The high resolution measurements of the proper motion of Polaris come from the 2007 reduction of the Hipparcos data:
[link to www.aanda.org]
The proper motion of Polaris can be independently verified using ground-based telescopes; since proper motion builds up over time, using high resolution images taken decades apart you can see its effect from one image to the next. For example, you can detect the proper motion of Polaris in images from the first and second Palomar Sky Survey that were taken using the same telescope almost 50 years apart. I used the following photographic film plates:

Plate XO001 (A2TX) photographed Aug 22, 1952 5:20 UT
Astrometrically solved image:
[link to nova.astrometry.net]

Plate XJ896 (A2NG) photographed Jan 17, 1998 5:12 UT
Astrometrically solved image:
[link to nova.astrometry.net]

The images 46 years apart should have a total motion of Polaris of about 2.1 arcseconds according to the hipparcos data (44.48 x 11.85 mas = combined vector of 46 milliarcseconds per year = 0.046 arcseconds per year * 46 years = 2.1 arcseconds).

For diffraction centroiding of Polaris, I measured the intersection of the diffraction spikes to find the position of Polaris in each image:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]

Zooming in on the difference between the intersection points in the diffraction spikes, and drawing a line between those intersection points, you can see that Polaris has moved about 2 arcseconds between 1952 and 1998, just as expected according to the Hipparcos data. And just as expected, the direction of motion is positive in right ascension and negative in declination (resulting in a higher right ascension value and slightly lower declination value in the 1998 image):
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]

So yes, Polaris has proper motion and does move over time, but due to the vast distance between our solar system and Polaris it takes years for these motions to become noticeable even in telescopic images at arcsecond resolution. Even over tens of thousands of years that it takes precession to cycle through, it would only move a fraction of a degree.

ROFL

5* OP

The Biblical Science points to 6,000 or 7,000 years since the Great Flood or Great Calamity.

Approximately...
.