Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,736 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,944,514
Pageviews Today: 2,575,112Threads Today: 658Posts Today: 10,812
09:29 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73114755
Australia
05/19/2017 06:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
List of transitional fossils:

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755


"Almost all of the transitional forms in this list do not actually represent ancestors of any living group or other transitional forms. Darwin noted that transitional forms could be considered common ancestors, direct ancestors or collateral ancestors of living or extinct groups, but believed that finding actual common or direct ancestors linking different groups was unlikely.[1][2]ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitio​nal_fossils"
 Quoting: DGN


If you do not understand what that means then you have no understanding of evolution whatsoever
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


If he doesn't understand what that means, he doesn't understand English. DGN now accepts that transitional fossils exist. Progress.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/19/2017 07:06 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
List of transitional fossils:

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755


"Almost all of the transitional forms in this list do not actually represent ancestors of any living group or other transitional forms. Darwin noted that transitional forms could be considered common ancestors, direct ancestors or collateral ancestors of living or extinct groups, but believed that finding actual common or direct ancestors linking different groups was unlikely.[1][2]ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitio​nal_fossils"
 Quoting: DGN


If you do not understand what that means then you have no understanding of evolution whatsoever
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


If he doesn't understand what that means, he doesn't understand English. DGN now accepts that transitional fossils exist. Progress.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755


Yessss, yesss they do and right here.

DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/19/2017 07:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


every fossil is a transitional fossil

there are no missing links, evolution is not linear

those 2 misconceptions are from a religious theory that had nothing to do with the theory of evolution
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74882066



THEORIES-----you are trying to legitimize a THEORY...no one in science has ever proved this to be anything but that.

Whenever someone tried to do this, it's always under the guise of 'disproving' the historical reference to God's existence.

Religion has a historical solidification to it.

Not just in one culture...but in MANY cultures.

And the fact that science cannot disprove everything we know and hinges on man-made experiments, proves there is no observable science to quantify what they 'consider'.

If I see a 'transitional being' than of course it would change my perspective.

But we are unique. There is no way we are by accident or by a cuzillion years of transitory mutations.

Explore the human body and you will reflect on the complicated nature of our existence and why we owe it to an intelligent force---and I don't mean ALIENS!


cool2
 Quoting: 1guynAz


And what would a transitional being look like to you????


Evolution is not linear. Its basically a bush. Or a tree. Lots of different branches, some that go extinct and some that survive. Creating different variations of animals. Like all the different types of birds, or on a larger scale all the different types of mammals. On a smaller scale, all the different types of beetles. The further you go into the bush the less like those at the tips of the tree, which is what we see in the fossil record. All the mammals are one branch. On that branch are other smaller branches. Like carnivora. Tons of carnivores went extinct. before humans even existed. Dogs get less dog-like the further you go into the bush. All the carnivores begin to get more similar the further you go into the bush.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74900650


"which is what we see in the fossil record."
Yeah if you're wearing 3D theater glasses so you can see each creature turning into another one, because there's no record of that in the ground or in the tree.
stars

Last Edited by DGN on 05/19/2017 08:11 PM
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/19/2017 08:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
like this

DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/20/2017 12:26 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
List of transitional fossils:

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755


"Almost all of the transitional forms in this list do not actually represent ancestors of any living group or other transitional forms. Darwin noted that transitional forms could be considered common ancestors, direct ancestors or collateral ancestors of living or extinct groups, but believed that finding actual common or direct ancestors linking different groups was unlikely.[1][2]ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitio​nal_fossils"
 Quoting: DGN


If you do not understand what that means then you have no understanding of evolution whatsoever
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


If he doesn't understand what that means, he doesn't understand English. DGN now accepts that transitional fossils exist. Progress.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755


Really, so why can't you present even one?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73114755
Australia
05/20/2017 12:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
...


"Almost all of the transitional forms in this list do not actually represent ancestors of any living group or other transitional forms. Darwin noted that transitional forms could be considered common ancestors, direct ancestors or collateral ancestors of living or extinct groups, but believed that finding actual common or direct ancestors linking different groups was unlikely.[1][2]ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitio​nal_fossils"
 Quoting: DGN


If you do not understand what that means then you have no understanding of evolution whatsoever
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


If he doesn't understand what that means, he doesn't understand English. DGN now accepts that transitional fossils exist. Progress.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755


Really, so why can't you present even one?
 Quoting: DGN


You already saw them on the page where you took that quote. You even highlighted part of the quote with bold text -indicating you agree with it- that says they exist.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/20/2017 01:15 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
...


If you do not understand what that means then you have no understanding of evolution whatsoever
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


If he doesn't understand what that means, he doesn't understand English. DGN now accepts that transitional fossils exist. Progress.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755


Really, so why can't you present even one?
 Quoting: DGN


You already saw them on the page where you took that quote. You even highlighted part of the quote with bold text -indicating you agree with it- that says they exist.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755

You mean where it confessed this?
"Almost all of the transitional forms in this list do not actually represent ancestors of any living group or other transitional forms."
charlie

Last Edited by DGN on 05/20/2017 01:16 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73114755
Australia
05/20/2017 01:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
...


If he doesn't understand what that means, he doesn't understand English. DGN now accepts that transitional fossils exist. Progress.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755


Really, so why can't you present even one?
 Quoting: DGN


You already saw them on the page where you took that quote. You even highlighted part of the quote with bold text -indicating you agree with it- that says they exist.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755

You mean where it confessed this?
"Almost all of the transitional forms in this list do not actually represent ancestors of any living group or other transitional forms."
charlie
 Quoting: DGN


You did it again. What you just posted states that transitional forms do exist. You must think the quote is valid, otherwise why would you post it.

I'm glad you finally accept that transitional fossils exist. You're about 100 years late, but hey, better late than never.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73041738
Australia
05/20/2017 07:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
When did the fusion of our 2nd chromosome take place in the eyes of creationists??


Neanderthals also have this fusion and so do the denisovans.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738

All chromosomes were made concurrently together or they would be as dysfunctional as a blueprint with missing specs.
"And Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul. 8 Further, Jehovah God planted a garden in E′den, toward the east, and there he put the man whom he had formed. 9 Thus Jehovah God made to grow out of the ground every tree desirable to oneís sight and good for food and also the tree of life in the middle of the garden and the tree of the knowledge of good and bad." Ge2:7
 Quoting: DGN


No. They know what a chromosome fusion looks like and its just what we see in the chromosome #2 in humans. Vestigial centromeres and telomeres in chromosome #2.

In the eyes of creationists, this must have occurred in one of Adam and Eve's children who we all descend from since everyone has it. Inlcuding neanderthals and denisovans. Which means neanderthals and denisovans must have evolved less than 6000 years ago. But neanderthals and denisovans did not evolve from humans we share a common ancestor. Which can only mean the mutation occurred in either Adam or Eve, but why would God create anyone with mutations? Oh of course he put the mutations there to trick us. That settles it.

But mutations weren't supposed to even exist at that point since creationists think we are all a product of incest but no mutations at that time existed.... (which means no blue eyes existed either, and other traits that are the result of mutations)
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/20/2017 09:57 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
...


Really, so why can't you present even one?
 Quoting: DGN


You already saw them on the page where you took that quote. You even highlighted part of the quote with bold text -indicating you agree with it- that says they exist.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755

You mean where it confessed this?
"Almost all of the transitional forms in this list do not actually represent ancestors of any living group or other transitional forms."
charlie
 Quoting: DGN


You did it again. What you just posted states that transitional forms do exist. You must think the quote is valid, otherwise why would you post it.

I'm glad you finally accept that transitional fossils exist. You're about 100 years late, but hey, better late than never.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73114755


Why can't you present even one?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74588060
05/20/2017 11:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
Another great thread DGN. Thanks.

Here's something to add to the mix: [link to www.independent.co.uk (secure)]

Here's the highly-credentialed Professor's book
[link to www.jstor.org]

Interesting to note that the doctrine of scientific materialism (whence Darwinism) is more and more under scrutiny and threat.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1576996
United States
05/20/2017 11:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
"If God is outside of nature, then He is outside of space and time. In that context, God could in the moment of the creation of the universe also know every detail of the future. That could include the formation of the stars, planets and galaxies, all of the chemistry, physics, geology and biology that led to the formation of life on earth, and the evolution of humans, right to this moment , and beyond.
In that context, evolution could appear to us to be driven by chance, but from Godís perspective the outcome would be entirely specified. Thus God could be completely and intimately involved in the creation of all species, while from our perspective, limited as it is by the tyranny of linear time, this would appear a random and undirected process"

This is a direct quote from Francis Collins, the former head of the Human Genome Project
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74850972


Why would God bother with an evolutionary process, when he could just wave his eternal hand and just create it? Through science and telescopes, we are realizing the size and scope of the universe, and God is bigger than it is.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73041738
Australia
05/20/2017 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...



THEORIES-----you are trying to legitimize a THEORY...no one in science has ever proved this to be anything but that.

Whenever someone tried to do this, it's always under the guise of 'disproving' the historical reference to God's existence.

Religion has a historical solidification to it.

Not just in one culture...but in MANY cultures.

And the fact that science cannot disprove everything we know and hinges on man-made experiments, proves there is no observable science to quantify what they 'consider'.

If I see a 'transitional being' than of course it would change my perspective.

But we are unique. There is no way we are by accident or by a cuzillion years of transitory mutations.

Explore the human body and you will reflect on the complicated nature of our existence and why we owe it to an intelligent force---and I don't mean ALIENS!


cool2
 Quoting: 1guynAz


And what would a transitional being look like to you????


Evolution is not linear. Its basically a bush. Or a tree. Lots of different branches, some that go extinct and some that survive. Creating different variations of animals. Like all the different types of birds, or on a larger scale all the different types of mammals. On a smaller scale, all the different types of beetles. The further you go into the bush the less like those at the tips of the tree, which is what we see in the fossil record. All the mammals are one branch. On that branch are other smaller branches. Like carnivora. Tons of carnivores went extinct. before humans even existed. Dogs get less dog-like the further you go into the bush. All the carnivores begin to get more similar the further you go into the bush.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74900650


"which is what we see in the fossil record."
Yeah if you're wearing 3D theater glasses so you can see each creature turning into another one, because there's no record of that in the ground or in the tree.
stars
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74900650


It is what they see. Different types of animals come and go through the fossil record. Animals like carnivores change over time into what we see today.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/20/2017 12:07 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


And what would a transitional being look like to you????


Evolution is not linear. Its basically a bush. Or a tree. Lots of different branches, some that go extinct and some that survive. Creating different variations of animals. Like all the different types of birds, or on a larger scale all the different types of mammals. On a smaller scale, all the different types of beetles. The further you go into the bush the less like those at the tips of the tree, which is what we see in the fossil record. All the mammals are one branch. On that branch are other smaller branches. Like carnivora. Tons of carnivores went extinct. before humans even existed. Dogs get less dog-like the further you go into the bush. All the carnivores begin to get more similar the further you go into the bush.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74900650


"which is what we see in the fossil record."
Yeah if you're wearing 3D theater glasses so you can see each creature turning into another one, because there's no record of that in the ground or in the tree.
stars
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74900650


It is what they see. Different types of animals come and go through the fossil record. Animals like carnivores change over time into what we see today.
 Quoting: DGN


Show me just one specific example.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74588060
05/20/2017 12:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
Scienctists have already created a living cell and with no help from "God".

"What Venter's company achieved was a technical feat that does not live up to its headlines. The team of scientists used machines to synthesize DNA from scratch. However, the particular DNA sequence they manufactured was an exact copy of pre-existing DNA from a living strain of bacteria.

The study authors stated, "This project was critically dependent on the accuracy of these [original bacterial] sequences." This is because even a slight error could ruin the resulting cell. They discovered this firsthand, when their "success was thwarted for many weeks by a single base pair deletion in the essential gene dnaA."2 Some portions, however, tolerated errors with no observed effects.

Once they accurately copied the exact required sequence of 582,970 DNA base pairs and then precisely synthesized the DNA itself--in shorter segments that were then added together--the synthesized genome was transferred to a type of yeast that is commonly used in laboratories. These yeast cells can accurately copy long sequences of DNA. So far, no human machine can do this. Yeast also has enzymes that maintain DNA integrity.

Finally, the researchers transferred the laboratory-synthesized, yeast-cloned DNA into a living bacterium that had its own DNA removed. The resulting cell grew and multiplied successfully in the lab."

_______________________________________
To be fair--
What Venter did was really rearrange some DNA and put it back into a pre-existing cell, which then reproduced itself. He did not create the cell itself, although this "new" bacteria is sometimes referred to as a "creation"
 Quoting: MarPep

All of which demonstrates even faking non intelligent design requires an intelligent deceiver.
wink
 Quoting: DGN


Yes, indeed.

And note the superlative technical achievement...just to produce this synthetic copy.

I honestly don't know how we are expected to believe that 'nature' originally did all this by itself.

Not only that but, even with the simplest of life forms, at the same time created over half a million precisely complementary DNA base pairs, the mechanics to glue them together, the outer casing...

I continue to be staggered at the sheer hubris of scientists and their bizarre belief systems.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/20/2017 12:25 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
Scienctists have already created a living cell and with no help from "God".

"What Venter's company achieved was a technical feat that does not live up to its headlines. The team of scientists used machines to synthesize DNA from scratch. However, the particular DNA sequence they manufactured was an exact copy of pre-existing DNA from a living strain of bacteria.

The study authors stated, "This project was critically dependent on the accuracy of these [original bacterial] sequences." This is because even a slight error could ruin the resulting cell. They discovered this firsthand, when their "success was thwarted for many weeks by a single base pair deletion in the essential gene dnaA."2 Some portions, however, tolerated errors with no observed effects.

Once they accurately copied the exact required sequence of 582,970 DNA base pairs and then precisely synthesized the DNA itself--in shorter segments that were then added together--the synthesized genome was transferred to a type of yeast that is commonly used in laboratories. These yeast cells can accurately copy long sequences of DNA. So far, no human machine can do this. Yeast also has enzymes that maintain DNA integrity.

Finally, the researchers transferred the laboratory-synthesized, yeast-cloned DNA into a living bacterium that had its own DNA removed. The resulting cell grew and multiplied successfully in the lab."

_______________________________________
To be fair--
What Venter did was really rearrange some DNA and put it back into a pre-existing cell, which then reproduced itself. He did not create the cell itself, although this "new" bacteria is sometimes referred to as a "creation"
 Quoting: MarPep

All of which demonstrates even faking non intelligent design requires an intelligent deceiver.
wink
 Quoting: DGN


Yes, indeed.

And note the superlative technical achievement...just to produce this synthetic copy.

I honestly don't know how we are expected to believe that 'nature' originally did all this by itself.

Not only that but, even with the simplest of life forms, at the same time created over half a million precisely complementary DNA base pairs, the mechanics to glue them together, the outer casing...

I continue to be staggered at the sheer hubris of scientists and their bizarre belief systems.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74588060


This is just to classic;
"Scienctists have already created a living cell and with no help from "God".
So this refutes life requires deliberate intelligent design?
rolleyes
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73041738
Australia
05/20/2017 01:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


"which is what we see in the fossil record."
Yeah if you're wearing 3D theater glasses so you can see each creature turning into another one, because there's no record of that in the ground or in the tree.
stars
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74900650


It is what they see. Different types of animals come and go through the fossil record. Animals like carnivores change over time into what we see today.
 Quoting: DGN


Show me just one specific example.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


Micadae evolved into the order carnivora. The genus Hesperocyon were one of the earliest dog-like genus's and are considered to be around 37-42 million years old. Hesperocyoninae descended from the genus Hesperocyon. Hesperocyoninae evolved to be the first of the 3 main dog groups, Hesperocyoninae, Borophaginae and Caninae.


Why so many different types of animals? I thought earth was supposed to only be 6000 years old? They would not all be able to live on earth at the same time and 6000 years is nothing.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/20/2017 01:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


It is what they see. Different types of animals come and go through the fossil record. Animals like carnivores change over time into what we see today.
 Quoting: DGN


Show me just one specific example.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


Micadae evolved into the order carnivora. The genus Hesperocyon were one of the earliest dog-like genus's and are considered to be around 37-42 million years old. Hesperocyoninae descended from the genus Hesperocyon. Hesperocyoninae evolved to be the first of the 3 main dog groups, Hesperocyoninae, Borophaginae and Caninae.


Why so many different types of animals? I thought earth was supposed to only be 6000 years old? They would not all be able to live on earth at the same time and 6000 years is nothing.
 Quoting: DGN


No human history dates back 6,000 years to Adam, no further, the earth is thought to be billions pf years old.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71994152
United States
05/20/2017 02:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2133026


What do you call the total void of transitional fossils, the scientific evidence of evolution?
 Quoting: DGN


I would call it vastly similar to the total void of any physical evidence for your own theories. A point you continue to conveniently ignore.

BTW, how do you know what actually happened? You're just spouting your own brand of unfounded bullshit.

Just because you believe your own horseshit doesn't make it real.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/20/2017 02:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2133026


What do you call the total void of transitional fossils, the scientific evidence of evolution?
 Quoting: DGN


I would call it vastly similar to the total void of any physical evidence for your own theories. A point you continue to conveniently ignore.

BTW, how do you know what actually happened? You're just spouting your own brand of unfounded bullshit.

Just because you believe your own horseshit doesn't make it real.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71994152

Minimum intelligence is required to recognize infinite intelligence.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73041738
Australia
05/20/2017 02:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


Show me just one specific example.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


Micadae evolved into the order carnivora. The genus Hesperocyon were one of the earliest dog-like genus's and are considered to be around 37-42 million years old. Hesperocyoninae descended from the genus Hesperocyon. Hesperocyoninae evolved to be the first of the 3 main dog groups, Hesperocyoninae, Borophaginae and Caninae.


Why so many different types of animals? I thought earth was supposed to only be 6000 years old? They would not all be able to live on earth at the same time and 6000 years is nothing.
 Quoting: DGN


No human history dates back 6,000 years to Adam, no further, the earth is thought to be billions pf years old.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


So you think all the animals that are alive today were around since your god created the earth??? And you think they haven't changed at all in billions of years?? Then why don't we see all of modern animals through the entire fossil record? They change over time..
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/20/2017 02:31 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


Micadae evolved into the order carnivora. The genus Hesperocyon were one of the earliest dog-like genus's and are considered to be around 37-42 million years old. Hesperocyoninae descended from the genus Hesperocyon. Hesperocyoninae evolved to be the first of the 3 main dog groups, Hesperocyoninae, Borophaginae and Caninae.


Why so many different types of animals? I thought earth was supposed to only be 6000 years old? They would not all be able to live on earth at the same time and 6000 years is nothing.
 Quoting: DGN


No human history dates back 6,000 years to Adam, no further, the earth is thought to be billions pf years old.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


So you think all the animals that are alive today were around since your god created the earth??? And you think they haven't changed at all in billions of years?? Then why don't we see all of modern animals through the entire fossil record? They change over time..
 Quoting: DGN

That's not my quote, computer glitch

The fossil record reveals each of the six creative days were of unspecified duration, some tens of thousands of years long, archeologists would have a better estimate.

Last Edited by DGN on 05/20/2017 05:03 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73269883
Belgium
05/20/2017 04:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


Micadae evolved into the order carnivora. The genus Hesperocyon were one of the earliest dog-like genus's and are considered to be around 37-42 million years old. Hesperocyoninae descended from the genus Hesperocyon. Hesperocyoninae evolved to be the first of the 3 main dog groups, Hesperocyoninae, Borophaginae and Caninae.


Why so many different types of animals? I thought earth was supposed to only be 6000 years old? They would not all be able to live on earth at the same time and 6000 years is nothing.
 Quoting: DGN


No human history dates back 6,000 years to Adam, no further, the earth is thought to be billions pf years old.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


So you think all the animals that are alive today were around since your god created the earth??? And you think they haven't changed at all in billions of years?? Then why don't we see all of modern animals through the entire fossil record? They change over time..
 Quoting: DGN


... or they don't change in those socalled billions of years and we call them living fossils.

The entire Coelacanth paradigm fell in the water and you just willfully ignore this. I know a lot of you believers take pride in scientific guesses and ofcourse the unknown, but when the scientific endeavour proves to you the guess was wrong and you just throw this out the window, along with your credibility, even if this is only glp.

You are being quite selective, a true cherrypicker as many other believers of evolution.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73114755
Australia
05/20/2017 09:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


No human history dates back 6,000 years to Adam, no further, the earth is thought to be billions pf years old.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


So you think all the animals that are alive today were around since your god created the earth??? And you think they haven't changed at all in billions of years?? Then why don't we see all of modern animals through the entire fossil record? They change over time..
 Quoting: DGN


... or they don't change in those socalled billions of years and we call them living fossils.

The entire Coelacanth paradigm fell in the water and you just willfully ignore this. I know a lot of you believers take pride in scientific guesses and ofcourse the unknown, but when the scientific endeavour proves to you the guess was wrong and you just throw this out the window, along with your credibility, even if this is only glp.

You are being quite selective, a true cherrypicker as many other believers of evolution.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


[link to www.talkorigins.org]

No one is ignoring Coelacanth. Can you explain why we don't see evidence of rabbits, puppies and goats living with T-rex and raptors?
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/20/2017 10:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


So you think all the animals that are alive today were around since your god created the earth??? And you think they haven't changed at all in billions of years?? Then why don't we see all of modern animals through the entire fossil record? They change over time..
 Quoting: DGN


... or they don't change in those socalled billions of years and we call them living fossils.

The entire Coelacanth paradigm fell in the water and you just willfully ignore this. I know a lot of you believers take pride in scientific guesses and ofcourse the unknown, but when the scientific endeavour proves to you the guess was wrong and you just throw this out the window, along with your credibility, even if this is only glp.

You are being quite selective, a true cherrypicker as many other believers of evolution.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


[link to www.talkorigins.org]

No one is ignoring Coelacanth. Can you explain why we don't see evidence of rabbits, puppies and goats living with T-rex and raptors?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73269883


They were created later or the Trex would have woofed them down.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73041738
Australia
05/21/2017 03:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


No human history dates back 6,000 years to Adam, no further, the earth is thought to be billions pf years old.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


So you think all the animals that are alive today were around since your god created the earth??? And you think they haven't changed at all in billions of years?? Then why don't we see all of modern animals through the entire fossil record? They change over time..
 Quoting: DGN


... or they don't change in those socalled billions of years and we call them living fossils.

The entire Coelacanth paradigm fell in the water and you just willfully ignore this. I know a lot of you believers take pride in scientific guesses and ofcourse the unknown, but when the scientific endeavour proves to you the guess was wrong and you just throw this out the window, along with your credibility, even if this is only glp.

You are being quite selective, a true cherrypicker as many other believers of evolution.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


ALL species would show up in the entire fossil record. Not just a select few. It is you being the cherry picker
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73041738
Australia
05/21/2017 03:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


So you think all the animals that are alive today were around since your god created the earth??? And you think they haven't changed at all in billions of years?? Then why don't we see all of modern animals through the entire fossil record? They change over time..
 Quoting: DGN


... or they don't change in those socalled billions of years and we call them living fossils.

The entire Coelacanth paradigm fell in the water and you just willfully ignore this. I know a lot of you believers take pride in scientific guesses and ofcourse the unknown, but when the scientific endeavour proves to you the guess was wrong and you just throw this out the window, along with your credibility, even if this is only glp.

You are being quite selective, a true cherrypicker as many other believers of evolution.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


ALL species would show up in the entire fossil record. Not just a select few. It is you being the cherry picker
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73269883


And they don't even show up in the entire fossil record either. There is a time where they do show up and there is a time where they don't see them.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73041738
Australia
05/21/2017 03:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


No human history dates back 6,000 years to Adam, no further, the earth is thought to be billions pf years old.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


So you think all the animals that are alive today were around since your god created the earth??? And you think they haven't changed at all in billions of years?? Then why don't we see all of modern animals through the entire fossil record? They change over time..
 Quoting: DGN

That's not my quote, computer glitch

The fossil record reveals each of the six creative days were of unspecified duration, some tens of thousands of years long, archeologists would have a better estimate.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


That doesn't explain anything. We should see fossils of domestic dogs in the entire fossil record if they have been around since the beginning of the earth.
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/21/2017 11:08 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?

...


So you think all the animals that are alive today were around since your god created the earth??? And you think they haven't changed at all in billions of years?? Then why don't we see all of modern animals through the entire fossil record? They change over time..
 Quoting: DGN

That's not my quote, computer glitch

The fossil record reveals each of the six creative days were of unspecified duration, some tens of thousands of years long, archeologists would have a better estimate.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73041738


That doesn't explain anything. We should see fossils of domestic dogs in the entire fossil record if they have been around since the beginning of the earth.
 Quoting: DGN


Last Edited by DGN on 05/21/2017 11:09 AM
DGN (OP)
Revelation in real time

User ID: 74915590
United States
05/21/2017 11:09 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ohhh Ohhh Professor Darwin, how will your Church of 'Evolution' explain creatures SUDDENLY appearing fully functional?
Actually it' strange we see dogs at all since they evolved into whales and went extinct millions of years ago. See for yourself.

You can trust Professor Darwin, he was a scientist.

Last Edited by DGN on 05/21/2017 11:11 AM


News