Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,023 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,113,303
Pageviews Today: 2,799,499Threads Today: 718Posts Today: 11,855
10:53 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

answer me this batman....if the assets go to Escrows first...

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73644195
United States
05/19/2017 01:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
answer me this batman....if the assets go to Escrows first...
Before going back to the original estate of a public traded company, then how do Escrow holders manage such assets.

I mean they are private. Escrows have no board of directors, no trading stock, and no shareholders to manage such assets.

The assets in my opinion have to come back to the original estate from the PUBLIC TRADED company it was stolen from, so that the new board of directors can MANAGE such assets.

Escrows have nothing in place in organizing to manage such assets.

And the truth is...the assets were taken from a public trading stock, so they need returned to the public trading stock.

Escrows need compensation and I can agree with that.

But I will be damned if Escrows are going to dictate how those assets get utilized with no board of directors.

Escrows need to be at the mercy of the company not the other way around, and the only way for that to happen is if the assets go back to the public traded company in which they were robbed from forst. Otherwise the company has no leverage and the company is at the mercy of bandits with no organization because they are not a company with organization to manage those assets.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 73644195
United States
05/19/2017 01:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: answer me this batman....if the assets go to Escrows first...
How can the assets go to a private non trading entity such as Escrows first so that they control the assets and how many shares the company will have to dilute?

Screw that. The company should tell Escrows how many shares it is willing to dilute in the AS. Otherwise the company isn't in control. We're the assets robbed from private holders? Or were the assets robbed from a PUBLIC TRADING STOCK? Return assets to the rightful owners first.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 73644195
United States
05/19/2017 01:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: answer me this batman....if the assets go to Escrows first...
How can the assets go to a private non trading entity such as Escrows first so that they control the assets and how many shares the company will have to dilute?

Screw that. The company should tell Escrows how many shares it is willing to dilute in the AS. Otherwise the company isn't in control. We're the assets robbed from private holders? Or were the assets robbed from a PUBLIC TRADING STOCK? Return assets to the rightful owners first.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73644195


I have no problem compensating especially Escrows. I just don't want them in control and to dictate how we run our company. The fucked it up the first time so why would I have them in control again?

Escrows are previous shareholders which means they are the ones who fucked this up the first time.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 73644195
United States
05/19/2017 01:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: answer me this batman....if the assets go to Escrows first...
How can the assets go to a private non trading entity such as Escrows first so that they control the assets and how many shares the company will have to dilute?

Screw that. The company should tell Escrows how many shares it is willing to dilute in the AS. Otherwise the company isn't in control. We're the assets robbed from private holders? Or were the assets robbed from a PUBLIC TRADING STOCK? Return assets to the rightful owners first.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73644195


I have no problem compensating especially Escrows. I just don't want them in control and to dictate how we run our company. The fucked it up the first time so why would I have them in control again?

Escrows are previous shareholders which means they are the ones who fucked this up the first time.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73644195


I don't want Escrows in charge. They will fuck us. They screwed us once they will do it again.

That is why we need a fresh start with this board of directors. Give them the damn assets so we can SEE what they will do with them.

How can hammer this board of directors when you don't give them anything to manage so we can see is they are legit or fucked up.

You gotta give them the damn assets so we can see their works. How can they work if there are no assets to work with. How can I judge that or them?
Nobuddy
User ID: 61473254
Canada
05/19/2017 01:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: answer me this batman....if the assets go to Escrows first...
Without escrows there's nothing to prevent the 'publicly traded' company from continuing along it's suicidal course..

No board or directors to run interference, no shareholders to 'demand' forward momentum & no assets to mis-'manage' everything sits still until the threat has been properly addressed.. else it all goes bye bye.

If the board of directors are not responsible for the 'direction' of the corporation.. then who is.?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74804615
United States
05/19/2017 01:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: answer me this batman....if the assets go to Escrows first...
Before going back to the original estate of a public traded company, then how do Escrow holders manage such assets.

I mean they are private. Escrows have no board of directors, no trading stock, and no shareholders to manage such assets.

The assets in my opinion have to come back to the original estate from the PUBLIC TRADED company it was stolen from, so that the new board of directors can MANAGE such assets.

Escrows have nothing in place in organizing to manage such assets.

And the truth is...the assets were taken from a public trading stock, so they need returned to the public trading stock.

Escrows need compensation and I can agree with that.

But I will be damned if Escrows are going to dictate how those assets get utilized with no board of directors.

Escrows need to be at the mercy of the company not the other way around, and the only way for that to happen is if the assets go back to the public traded company in which they were robbed from forst. Otherwise the company has no leverage and the company is at the mercy of bandits with no organization because they are not a company with organization to manage those assets.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73644195


Is the asset a business or Real Estate? It sounds like you are under the impression that Escrow companies have the ability to control assets without any restrictions.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72398115
United States
05/19/2017 02:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: answer me this batman....if the assets go to Escrows first...
As precedents would not be so applicable in this disturbance of the peace and smooth operation of said such company, which is in all ways certainly disruptive, Escrows would be as good as dead flotsam jetsam or salvage. In which case, as such being extra leverage to hassle within the strict legalism of escaping stupidity taxes from market forces, future Escrow earnings potential would be the underutilized unrealized gains. As always, or not depending on how that guy against OP wants to play.
MyLifeForYou!

User ID: 71740445
United States
05/19/2017 02:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: answer me this batman....if the assets go to Escrows first...
Fuck your corporation. Corporations were a major reason for the revolutionary war and they will be a major reason for the 2nd revolution.
There's a 95% chance you are a candy ass uniparty tory.


News