Unresolved mistery: What is the speed of Gravity?

So, basically: 1=1.

Thanks for that.

every atom in your body is very very old

no atoms will die ever ever

why is the sun will die? cus science told you so?

are u still a sheep?

the sun will never cool off a bit, the sun does not shoot out energy/photon into space around it.

the sun shares its radiant energy with matters around it.

hot atoms on the sun share their vibrating force with matters on earth, f=G x m1m2/rr and f=Ke x e1e2/rr are the carriers of sun's energy.

sun light/solar energy is not keeping shooting at earth,
but moving around the earth as earth spins.

the same energy circling around, never lose a bit into space.

1=1 about what? word salad?

Your math, not mine.

energy can only exist within matter/charged particles

force can only exist within charged particles/matter

keys to understanding the universe

by now, you should understand there is no such thing as zero point energy, vacuum energy, free energy.

there is no dark matter, dark energy, no black holes.

gravity is not a mystery, nothing can distort space or time.

understand science mistakes/lies, see the reality in a new vision.

Have to watch this video, when gravitational waves "were measured" three years ago. It's funny!

my guess is that "speed of gravity" is a construct humans use to describe something they are unable to understand, similar is a construct we use "time" to describe the decay of matter

because gravity appears to be instantaneous

gravity does no propagate

gravity is the result that large mass has on space, and the effect is felt instantly because the space itself is altered

also large mass probably affects space in other dimentions, so that would explain why we see gravity in our universe but cannot find 90% of the mass that the gravity should "originate" from, because the gravity is the sum of all mass effects from other parallel universes, as well

einstein's theory is bullshit...

if you were to have a tug-of-war with a man on the moon, and he suddenly yanked on the rope really hard so that he gained inches of rope in a split second, you would feel it INSTANTLY --- the slack he picked up comes from you

that's like placing a bowling ball on a bed, then putting a marble on the bed and watching it roll towards the impression the bowling ball makes

you wouldn't ask how long it takes for the bowling ball to send waves of attraction out to the marble

space itself is the bed, and it is altered by large mass, there is no propagation time, it is already a done deal and the effect is the gravity

I agree. Gravity is dependent on the mass of an object. The more mass, the more gravity. If mass is constant, gravity is static. Gravity has no velocity. It is an inherent property of mass. It's like wet and water. Neither can be treated separately.

Signed,
Al

Correct. The best way to understand gravity and the nature of the universe is to consider what Einstein said, and study the opposite, because he was wrong on pretty much everything.

Space has no properties. You need to consider the Aether.

In theory it should be equivalent to the speed of light.

In reality it is relative to mass energy.

The speed of gravity nearest to the nearest black hole is 10.425 quadrillion times the speed of light.

It's where our theoretical physics fall apart, and why they've got time and space so horribly wrong.

Time as we perceive it is constant but wildly variable throughout the universe. At the center of the universe (if you were there now) time would progress normally for you, and on your timepiece, but hours for you there passed, while in that time millions of years would have passed here.

That's good for a start, except space itself has no properties.

Each atom is surrounded by a field. (A field is a perturbation in the Aether.)

If many atoms have the fields coherently aligned, the effect is magnetism. If the alignment is incoherent, the effect is gravity.

Since the Aether is in all, and is all, the fields are connected. (This is how instantaneous action at a distance is possible.)

Masses that are separated experience inertia, which is a property of the Aether. When the bodies get close enough for the effect to be noticeable, their fields interact, causing a loss of inertia, because the fields are a type of low pressure zone in the Aether.

The loss of inertia causes an acceleration, which people call magnetic "attraction" (if coherent), or gravitational "attraction" (if incoherent).

Cool thread!
Not unresolved! was solved on a commodore C64!


Thread: DIY: Journey to the centre of the earth (Page 5)

The actual real formulas and equations for the above extremely simplified explanation would change this would and our technologies in ways you can't possibly imagine, or explore in theoretical physics.

We are neither worthy nor ready for it...

Would=world

But it can't fix autocorrect errors.

lol

Van Flandern also discusses the famous Michelson-Morely experiment, the Michelson-Gale experiment, and the Sagnac experiment, which are often cited as discrediting Lorentz’s version of relativity. The truth of the matter is that Lorentz’s version of relativity can easily account for the observations if one simply assumes a local gravity field with preferred frame for local observers, rather than a universal gravity field. Further, at the time, the wave nature of matter has not yet been discovered by Louis de Broglie.

Van Flandern concludes his paper by saying:

Near the end of his career, Lorentz is quoted as having graciously conceded the contest: “My theory can obtain all the same results as special relativity, but perhaps not with a comparable simplicity.” (private communication from C.O. Alley) Today, with hindsight, we might make a somewhat different assessment: “Special relativity can explain all the experimental results in Table II that Lorentzian relativity can, but perhaps not with a comparable simplicity.” Even so, SR cannot explain the faster-than-light propagation of gravity, although LR readily can.

We conclude that the speed of gravity may provide the new insight physics has been awaiting to lead the way to unification of the fundamental forces.

gravity only exist between matter and matter

mass has no gravity on space, mass and space cannot interact.

when the distance between two matters changes, their gravity changes. gravity speed is electrostatic force speed.

all bodies/masses/matters in space are connected by an invisible rubber band we called gravity.

if one mass is moving/vibrating, all the rest masses will share the force according to their distance. F=G x m1m2/rr.

that is the true gravity wave.

gravity is induced attraction electrostatic force, therefore gravity speed is equal to electrostatic force speed.

light is vibrating electrostatic force produced by hot/exited/vibrating charged particles, therefore light speed is equal to gravity speed.

forget about what you learned from books, all wrong.

Asking what the speed of gravity is, is like asking what the speed of the wind is. It depends.

"all bodies/masses/matters in space are connected by an invisible rubber band we called gravity the Aether.


"light is vibrating electrostatic force produced by hot/exited/vibrating charged particles perturbations in the Aether, therefore light speed is equal to much slower than gravity speed."

Fixed it for you ^^

Lorentz theory was an attempt to demonstrate that "existence of ether" was in accordance with invariance of Laws of Electromagnetism.

Result of Michelson Morley experiment itself did not shatter that theory.

Albert Einstein noted: “Concerning the Experiment of Michelson and Morley, H.A. Lorentz showed that the result obtained at least does not contradict the theory of an ether at rest”

[link to www.relativitybook.com]

It is often said, that the Lorentz Ether theory and Special Relativity are empirically equivalent and it is not possible to distinguish between these theories by experiment.

The Lorentz Ether Theory explains null result of ether- drift experiments by means of contraction hypothesis and local time.

The both theories employ the same set of transformations (so – called Lorentz Transformations). Reciprocity of observations in Special Relativity takes place due to physical equivalence of reference frames.

there is no aether, no photon, no quantum.

what is aether made of? what's the mechanism?

science you learned from books is not all correct

the only thing correct is nature laws

we found two, f=G x m1m2/rr and f=Ke x q1q2/rr.



Einstein's theories are all mistakes.

Photoelectric effect theory won him a Nobel. Later he admit it was mistaken. All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?' Nowadays every Tom, D i c k and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -Albert Einstein 1953

He thought gravity able to slow down light. If a star has enough mass, its light will be slow down so much and make it invisible, so black hole.

In reality, all star lights have the same speed C. Real black hole is in every toilet.

He thought the sun's gravity able to bend light so at solar eclipse we can see stars behind the sun.

In fact, hot plasma on sun's surface reflect/bend those stars light behind the sun. So those dumb scientists able to took a picture back then to support his theory.

He thought nothing can travel at light speed due to unlimited energy is needed.

Mistaken, he don't even sure what is energy/quantum.

All the motion is caused by force, electrostatic force. f=ma, enough force able to push matter at any speed.

But force has a speed limit, electrostatic force and gravity have same speed as light speed. A train travels at 100 m/h cannot push a man to 101/m/h.

E=Mcc is total bs. Matter is charged particles, energy is the electrostatic force matter carries.