What do you think of the flat earth? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65066428 United States 06/21/2017 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75112784 United States 06/21/2017 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
still flat User ID: 75118557 United States 06/21/2017 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seems all the ball people have is insults and character assassination. When your only argumnet is abusive words you have none. It is not your fault that you have been decived since you were a child. A ball Earth lie often told is still a lie. There is zero physical proof of the ball Earth theory, none. There is no curvature, no curvature not a ball, not a ball then you cannot call the Earth a sphere. The Earth is and shall always remain a flat plane. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65066428 United States 06/21/2017 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75120927 Brazil 06/21/2017 09:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75112784 United States 06/21/2017 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75106529 Japan 06/22/2017 03:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't make sense, it's the original video uploaded and the source from the ESA is in this thread. Quit acting like this isn't an obvious fail. They got busted and you're too butthurt to admit it. Globeheads like you, Hydra, are pathetic and suffer from severe cognitive dissonance. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75106529 SOURCE VIDEO: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] go to the 15:11 mark Original Video using software to brighten the video proving the obvious fake CGI bullshit from the ESA: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Source video: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75106529 Trying to prove that a video is CGI by applying CGI is simply hypocritical. If you could prove that e.g. the weather patterns in the ISS video didn't match with the actual weather at the locations in the ISS flight path, you had a point - but not by applying CGI to the video. Oh come on Hydra, you know that the stars can be seen clearly without any video effect manipulation whatsoever. He only brightened the white spots to show what he was talking about even more clearly. There is definitely something strange about that footage and it's clearly not dust or dirt on a window. Those are meant to be stars just like in other footage from space, but they messed up and put the stars on a layer in front of the Earth making it appear as if the Earth is transparent. Even you can admit that it's at the very least a bit strange. Oh, you think that the dots are stars. Do you really think that the NASA guys are dumber than the average YouTube uploader? Do you really think that they are so dumb that they overlay "stars" over the complete image? Do you really think they would overlay a random pixel pattern instead of known star patterns? Do you really think that they don't know what stars would be visible from the ISS? The pixel pattern is stationary even when the camera is moved at the end of the video, it's simply a chip with damaged pixels. And at the end of the video (11:48) [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] , when the horizon gets darker, you can see real stars that move with the camera and according to the orbit of the ISS. Can you give us a reason, why they should overlay "stars", when there are stars visible in the video? Desperate try to dismiss this video, but flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. . Yes. To all of your questions. They made a mistake here and it was obvious. They are only human after all and we all make mistakes. This wouldn't be the first time they made a mistake either but it's damning evidence that they are faking this footage. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75106529 Japan 06/22/2017 03:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The flat earth conspiracy exists because they don't want you to know that we are living in a dome. If we live on a globe, a dome is impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65066428 :derp4: Typical globe head had no argument. That's a nice pic of yourself reacting to the truth of a flat earth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75106529 Japan 06/22/2017 05:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've marked the video to begin at 44:05 as that is the only thing I'm discussing now. Specifically the comparison of footage from 1990 to footage from 2011. Look at how fake the clouds move in the old footage. Now with better technology it seems NASA can fake the cloud change and make them more believable... This should at the very least make you question the validity of anything NASA shares when it comes to views of the Earth from space. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71946138 United States 06/22/2017 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hydra User ID: 48407174 Germany 06/22/2017 06:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Hydra ... Trying to prove that a video is CGI by applying CGI is simply hypocritical. If you could prove that e.g. the weather patterns in the ISS video didn't match with the actual weather at the locations in the ISS flight path, you had a point - but not by applying CGI to the video. Oh come on Hydra, you know that the stars can be seen clearly without any video effect manipulation whatsoever. He only brightened the white spots to show what he was talking about even more clearly. There is definitely something strange about that footage and it's clearly not dust or dirt on a window. Those are meant to be stars just like in other footage from space, but they messed up and put the stars on a layer in front of the Earth making it appear as if the Earth is transparent. Even you can admit that it's at the very least a bit strange. Oh, you think that the dots are stars. Do you really think that the NASA guys are dumber than the average YouTube uploader? Do you really think that they are so dumb that they overlay "stars" over the complete image? Do you really think they would overlay a random pixel pattern instead of known star patterns? Do you really think that they don't know what stars would be visible from the ISS? The pixel pattern is stationary even when the camera is moved at the end of the video, it's simply a chip with damaged pixels. And at the end of the video (11:48) [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] , when the horizon gets darker, you can see real stars that move with the camera and according to the orbit of the ISS. Can you give us a reason, why they should overlay "stars", when there are stars visible in the video? Desperate try to dismiss this video, but flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. Yes. To all of your questions. I didn't expect something else. Flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Hydra User ID: 48407174 Germany 06/22/2017 06:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've marked the video to begin at 44:05 as that is the only thing I'm discussing now. Specifically the comparison of footage from 1990 to footage from 2011. Look at how fake the clouds move in the old footage. Now with better technology it seems NASA can fake the cloud change and make them more believable... This should at the very least make you question the validity of anything NASA shares when it comes to views of the Earth from space. Japan again throws shit at the wall, in the hope that something sticks. Don't post to much YouTube videos - you know what happened the last times you did it. Flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75106529 Japan 06/22/2017 07:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've marked the video to begin at 44:05 as that is the only thing I'm discussing now. Specifically the comparison of footage from 1990 to footage from 2011. Look at how fake the clouds move in the old footage. Now with better technology it seems NASA can fake the cloud change and make them more believable... This should at the very least make you question the validity of anything NASA shares when it comes to views of the Earth from space. Japan again throws shit at the wall, in the hope that something sticks. Don't post to much YouTube videos - you know what happened the last times you did it. Flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. . So something here is strange and you simply call it shit sticking to the wall. Globe earth shills have to dismiss every fake space photo and video, it's in their job description. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75106529 Japan 06/22/2017 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75106529 Oh come on Hydra, you know that the stars can be seen clearly without any video effect manipulation whatsoever. He only brightened the white spots to show what he was talking about even more clearly. There is definitely something strange about that footage and it's clearly not dust or dirt on a window. Those are meant to be stars just like in other footage from space, but they messed up and put the stars on a layer in front of the Earth making it appear as if the Earth is transparent. Even you can admit that it's at the very least a bit strange. Oh, you think that the dots are stars. Do you really think that the NASA guys are dumber than the average YouTube uploader? Do you really think that they are so dumb that they overlay "stars" over the complete image? Do you really think they would overlay a random pixel pattern instead of known star patterns? Do you really think that they don't know what stars would be visible from the ISS? The pixel pattern is stationary even when the camera is moved at the end of the video, it's simply a chip with damaged pixels. And at the end of the video (11:48) [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] , when the horizon gets darker, you can see real stars that move with the camera and according to the orbit of the ISS. Can you give us a reason, why they should overlay "stars", when there are stars visible in the video? Desperate try to dismiss this video, but flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. Yes. To all of your questions. I didn't expect something else. Globe earth shills have to dismiss every fake space photo and video, it's in their job description. . You conveniently removed the rest of my post: "They made a mistake here and it was obvious. They are only human after all and we all make mistakes. This wouldn't be the first time they made a mistake either but it's damning evidence that they are faking this footage." They messed up and you are dismissing it because it's an obvious mistake that cannot be explained. Your cognitive dissonance is keeping you from admitting that they are liars. |
Hydra User ID: 46912050 Germany 06/22/2017 08:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Hydra Oh, you think that the dots are stars. Do you really think that the NASA guys are dumber than the average YouTube uploader? Do you really think that they are so dumb that they overlay "stars" over the complete image? Do you really think they would overlay a random pixel pattern instead of known star patterns? Do you really think that they don't know what stars would be visible from the ISS? The pixel pattern is stationary even when the camera is moved at the end of the video, it's simply a chip with damaged pixels. And at the end of the video (11:48) [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] , when the horizon gets darker, you can see real stars that move with the camera and according to the orbit of the ISS. Can you give us a reason, why they should overlay "stars", when there are stars visible in the video? Desperate try to dismiss this video, but flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. Yes. To all of your questions. I didn't expect something else. Flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. You conveniently removed the rest of my post: "I'm a little Japanese asshole who changes other posters quotes." :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75106529 Japan 06/22/2017 11:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I didn't expect something else. Flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. You conveniently removed the rest of my post: "Globe earth shills have to dismiss every fake space photo and video, it's in their job description." Giving you a taste of your own medicine, if you don't like it don't edit my posts either. Address the change in the clouds from alleged footage from space, or continue to dismiss the obvious mistakes. And for the record I live in Japan but I'm not Japanese. Fix your SJW filled country. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73012677 United States 06/22/2017 11:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61432737 United States 06/22/2017 11:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
fireworkartist User ID: 75093784 United States 06/23/2017 12:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Revelation 3:15 New International Version "I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other!" You may also find "Common Sense" by Thomas Paine helpful. Good grief. An open mind does not necessitate the re-evidencing of hen's teeth, OP. Got yourself a working brian? Use it, moran. fireworkartist |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 62294659 Canada 06/23/2017 01:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They need the earth to be a globe so they can justify why all the rockets going into space turn sideways and not go straight up. No video of rocket going straight up into space. Alien deception agenda to unite the world. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 40783562 Its also a gatekeeper. If you believe the Earth is a globe, you should believe everything else including Newtonian physics and laws of; but why cant there be more than one set of rules. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73012677 United States 06/23/2017 01:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74634135 United States 06/23/2017 02:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47798342 United States 06/23/2017 02:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 62294659 Canada 06/23/2017 03:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Aircraft tracking does not use GPS, it uses ground based stations. And you just gave an argument against the flat earth: if earth were flat, aircraft tracking should also work in the southern hemisphere. GPS works in one direction: satellite --> GPS receiver. Aircrafts, as cars, don't have a GPS transmitter on board. No it does work, but the airplane tracking deliberately doesn't work because it would prove a flat earth... The principle: GPS satellites constantly transmit their position above earth and their time. The GPS receiver in an aircraft gets the data from the satellites (usually 6 to 8) and calculates from this data its position on earth. This calculated position is automatically transmitted by an ADS-B transmitter on the aircraft. The ADS-B signal, giving the position of the aircraft, can be received by ADS-B receivers on other aircraft or ground stations. Want to get one? Here you go: [link to www.flightradar24.com (secure)] And who told you that "the airplane tracking deliberately doesn't work because it would prove a flat earth"? Some guy on YouTube? Deliberately switching of the ADS-B transmitter would put aircrafts at risk since the collision warning system depends on the ADS-B signals. The picture below shows two flights, UA 7941 from Washington, DC to Tokyo and QF 28 from Sydney to Santiago de Chile. Both flights have a duration of about 14 hours 15 minutes. The distances on a globe earth are 10,930 km resp. 11,370 km. On a flat earth the distance Sydney - Santiago is twice as long as the distance Washington - Tokyo and QF 28 should take more than 28 hours. I see you must have an early copy of the new Flat Earth map... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70248054 Cyprus 06/23/2017 03:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they are corrupt and compartmentalized. They are there for the paycheck. They believe in the fairytale just like you do Hydra, except for the ones at the top, who laugh their ass off at people like you defending them without getting a paycheck. You don't make sense, it's the original video uploaded and the source from the ESA is in this thread. Quit acting like this isn't an obvious fail. They got busted and you're too butthurt to admit it. Globeheads like you, Hydra, are pathetic and suffer from severe cognitive dissonance. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75106529 SOURCE VIDEO: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] go to the 15:11 mark Original Video using software to brighten the video proving the obvious fake CGI bullshit from the ESA: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Source video: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75106529 Trying to prove that a video is CGI by applying CGI is simply hypocritical. If you could prove that e.g. the weather patterns in the ISS video didn't match with the actual weather at the locations in the ISS flight path, you had a point - but not by applying CGI to the video. Oh come on Hydra, you know that the stars can be seen clearly without any video effect manipulation whatsoever. He only brightened the white spots to show what he was talking about even more clearly. There is definitely something strange about that footage and it's clearly not dust or dirt on a window. Those are meant to be stars just like in other footage from space, but they messed up and put the stars on a layer in front of the Earth making it appear as if the Earth is transparent. Even you can admit that it's at the very least a bit strange. Oh, you think that the dots are stars. Do you really think that the NASA guys are dumber than the average YouTube uploader? Do you really think that they are so dumb that they overlay "stars" over the complete image? Do you really think they would overlay a random pixel pattern instead of known star patterns? Do you really think that they don't know what stars would be visible from the ISS? The pixel pattern is stationary even when the camera is moved at the end of the video, it's simply a chip with damaged pixels. And at the end of the video (11:48) [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] , when the horizon gets darker, you can see real stars that move with the camera and according to the orbit of the ISS. Can you give us a reason, why they should overlay "stars", when there are stars visible in the video? Desperate try to dismiss this video, but flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. . |
Hydra User ID: 46912050 Germany 06/23/2017 05:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I didn't expect something else. Flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. You conveniently removed the rest of my post: "I'm a little Japanese asshole who changes other posters quotes." Giving you a taste of your own medicine, if you don't like it don't edit my posts either. When did I change your post, before you started with it? Link please! Address the change in the clouds from alleged footage from space, or continue to dismiss the obvious mistakes. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75106529 Why should I address your point, when you never addressed any of my points? And: Flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. And for the record I live in Japan but I'm not Japanese. Fix your SJW filled country. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75106529 If you don't like to be called Japanese, register and get a screen name. And what have SJW in Germany to do with a flat earth? . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Hydra User ID: 46912050 Germany 06/23/2017 05:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They need the earth to be a globe so they can justify why all the rockets going into space turn sideways and not go straight up. No video of rocket going straight up into space. Alien deception agenda to unite the world. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 40783562 If you believe the Earth is a globe, you should believe everything else including Newtonian physics and laws of; but why cant there be more than one set of rules. Then present the alternative set of rules for verification. Present the rules that keep the sun, moon, planets and stars above Earth. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Hydra User ID: 46912050 Germany 06/23/2017 05:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Hydra Aircraft tracking does not use GPS, it uses ground based stations. And you just gave an argument against the flat earth: if earth were flat, aircraft tracking should also work in the southern hemisphere. GPS works in one direction: satellite --> GPS receiver. Aircrafts, as cars, don't have a GPS transmitter on board. No it does work, but the airplane tracking deliberately doesn't work because it would prove a flat earth... The principle: GPS satellites constantly transmit their position above earth and their time. The GPS receiver in an aircraft gets the data from the satellites (usually 6 to 8) and calculates from this data its position on earth. This calculated position is automatically transmitted by an ADS-B transmitter on the aircraft. The ADS-B signal, giving the position of the aircraft, can be received by ADS-B receivers on other aircraft or ground stations. Want to get one? Here you go: [link to www.flightradar24.com (secure)] And who told you that "the airplane tracking deliberately doesn't work because it would prove a flat earth"? Some guy on YouTube? Deliberately switching of the ADS-B transmitter would put aircrafts at risk since the collision warning system depends on the ADS-B signals. The picture below shows two flights, UA 7941 from Washington, DC to Tokyo and QF 28 from Sydney to Santiago de Chile. Both flights have a duration of about 14 hours 15 minutes. The distances on a globe earth are 10,930 km resp. 11,370 km. On a flat earth the distance Sydney - Santiago is twice as long as the distance Washington - Tokyo and QF 28 should take more than 28 hours. I see you must have an early copy of the new Flat Earth map... Present the latest copy of the flat earth map that fixes the problem ... . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Hydra User ID: 46912050 Germany 06/23/2017 05:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they are corrupt and compartmentalized. They are there for the paycheck. They believe in the fairytale just like you do Hydra, except for the ones at the top, who laugh their ass off at people like you defending them without getting a paycheck. Quoting: Cyprus Coward 70248054 Is the angular size of the sun in the sky smaller in winter than it is in summer in Cyprus? . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75106529 Japan 06/23/2017 11:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Hydra I didn't expect something else. Flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. You conveniently removed the rest of my post: "I'm a little Japanese asshole who changes other posters quotes." Giving you a taste of your own medicine, if you don't like it don't edit my posts either. When did I change your post, before you started with it? Link please! Address the change in the clouds from alleged footage from space, or continue to dismiss the obvious mistakes. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75106529 Why should I address your point, when you never addressed any of my points? And: Flat earth shills have to dismiss every space photo and video, it's in their job description. And for the record I live in Japan but I'm not Japanese. Fix your SJW filled country. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75106529 If you don't like to be called Japanese, register and get a screen name. And what have SJW in Germany to do with a flat earth? . You deleted the rest of my post, that's editing it. You did this initially and now you are butthurt because your post was edited. Grow some thicker skin. I don't mind being called Japanese, but I'm just clarifying that I am not a Japanese person. For some reason you often point that out as if it will help your argument somehow or as if it's somehow insulting...to be clear it's not insulting and it has no effect on your points. Every space photo and video IS fake, only shills like you are dismissive. But honestly, I could care less what you think. SJW are fucking up your country, they are corrupting your government and you must be just as blind, ignorant and biased as any simple minded SJW. To believe in a globe is to deny the truth that you have been lied to, it's ridiculous and your cognitive dissonance is obvious. The Earth is flat regardless of what you think. |