Don't impeach Bush, let him bungle on

Why don't they anoint Rothschild as President

Bring it all out in the open.

Sadly, we will have to live with the Bush/Cheney regime until January '09. And I am not too optimistic about the '08 elections either. I am not excited about any of the candidates (both Democratic and Republican) that are running. Hopefully, Ron Paul will decide to run to make things interesting. Sure, he won't win, but he doesn't seem to be part of the NWO gang. He is totally against the Federal Reserve, would push for another 9/11 independent investigation... two of the biggest taints on American society right now.

I am still waiting for Jeb Bush to announce his intentions to run for President in '08. Naysayers would state that America has had enough of the Bush name. However, don't underestimate the stupidity of the American people.

Sadly, we will have to live with the Bush/Cheney regime until January '09. And I am not too optimistic about the '08 elections either. I am not excited about any of the candidates (both Democratic and Republican) that are running. Hopefully, Ron Paul will decide to run to make things interesting. Sure, he won't win, but he doesn't seem to be part of the NWO gang. He is totally against the Federal Reserve, would push for another 9/11 independent investigation... two of the biggest taints on American society right now.

I am still waiting for Jeb Bush to announce his intentions to run for President in '08. Naysayers would state that America has had enough of the Bush name. However, don't underestimate the stupidity of the American people.

Sadly, we will have to live with the Bush/Cheney regime until January '09. And I am not too optimistic about the '08 elections either. I am not excited about any of the candidates (both Democratic and Republican) that are running. Hopefully, Ron Paul will decide to run to make things interesting. Sure, he won't win, but he doesn't seem to be part of the NWO gang. He is totally against the Federal Reserve, would push for another 9/11 independent investigation... two of the biggest taints on American society right now.

I am still waiting for Jeb Bush to announce his intentions to run for President in '08. Naysayers would state that America has had enough of the Bush name. However, don't underestimate the stupidity of the American people.

The, Jeb Bush thought is a frightful one....... Isn't, he a PNAC cohort?

Bush a notorious silverspoon pansy pretends to be a tough guy.

Permit me a foray of a paragraph into psychojournalism. It fascinates me to know that George Bush was a male cheerleader at Andover. Yes, it could have been worse. He might have been a table-dancer. But most of us who were in high school when he was recognize that you either came to watch football, or you came to watch the girl cheerleaders. There was something odd about a boy who wanted to be one.

We are ruled by a male cheerleader who favors torture. I wonder what things twist in the inner fog.



"Ricky, Ricky he's our man. If he can't do it, nobody can. Goooooooooooo Plesiosaurs!"

Given a president who seems chiefly concerned to display his indomitable manhood, the question arises: What restraints keep him from absolute control of a formidably armed nation of three hundred million? The Constitution, noblest of fables, was designed to do just this. But absent the will to enforce them, checks and balances do not exist, and laws, principles, and constitutions mean nothing. If no one says “no,” the president simply behaves as he wants. The genius of the strange little man in the White House has been to recognize this, to divine the weakness of the American political order.

When he wanted to attack Iraq, he simply lied, and lied again, and shifted his ground and lied again. It worked. When he didn’t want to follow the Geneva Conventions in his treatment of captured Iraqis, he just declared his prisoners of war not to be prisoners of war. Torture? He just did it and faced down the country and the world. Disregard of civil rights? Spying? He just did as he chose.

Here is the great discovery of the little man who doesn’t read. America is not the land of the free, nor of the brave, nor of the politically sentient. Nor is it a country of laws or of principles. It is a country of those who just do as they want. A president can do anything he chooses. Who will tell him no? Nobody has.

Today there is speculation as to whether he will make war, perhaps nuclear war, on Iran. The universal assumption seems to be that if he wants to, he will just do it. The legislature, already having given up its authority to declare war, seems to regard the military as the private guard of the president. Is it not interesting that one dim, pugnacious, ignorant little man can bring on nuclear war all by himself?

When Mr. Bush gets caught lying or breaking the law, he shows no embarrassment, contrition, or sense of having done anything wrong. He seems to have no conception of right and wrong, of principle. He is not accustomed to being told “no,” and accepts no constraints on his power. All that matters to him is that he get his way. He gets it.

Where will this lead? Obviously, to vastly increased police powers. But I wonder. If, down the pike, Bush announced that to protect us from terrorism he would have to postpone the presidential elections and remain in office—what would happen? Suppose he came up with a bit of supportive theater. If just before the elections something blew up, and were attributed not to the CIA but to Terrace, what then? The Reichstag has burned before. The public, the congress, the judiciary are so very, very easily manipulated. All it takes is the will to do it.

And that the little man has.

A tribal rite in the column racket is the discovery of darkness in the hearts of presidents, or witlessness, and we discover away industriously. I have done my share. I thought Clinton a bright, libidinous lout, Jimmy Carter a moralizing cipher, Reagan a sort of Grandfather Barbie and, by contrast, Eisenhower a wise man hiding behind remarkable syntax. None was evil, or mad. Bush is something new in presidential politics, genuinely dangerous and genuinely out of control. The time is ripe for him. America no longer has the institutional defenses to say "no."

Fred Reed
Shrub-scrub to tough guys.

Rumor is: Rudy does more dress-up than J. Edgar Hoover.

Rumor is: Rudy does more dress-up than J. Edgar Hoover.



Um... where did you hear that J. Edgar Hoover was a cross dresser? The media? Keep in mind that J. Edgar Hoover was very suspicious of who actually killed JFK. Unless I see undoctored photographs of Hoover in a ballroom gown, I will stick to my opinion that he was slandered by our govt to minimalize him.

Rumor is: Rudy does more dress-up than J. Edgar Hoover.

I'd say let Bush just keep plowing under the neo-Brats

"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes that you can do these things. Among them are a few Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or businessman from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid." --President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952