Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch Blast SCOTUS for Refusing to Hear Major Second Amendment Case

Texas is in the 5th Circut

THERE ARE MANY OTHER SOURCES MORAN

AND I CAN SEE THE ONLY SHILL HERE IS YOU

THAT WOULD TAKE 61 VOTES IN THE SENATE WHICH WE DON'T HAVE

I pinned this for you because it's important.

I didn't create this thread. I'm not saying the one claiming that a California ruling will affect the entire country. I'm not the one insisting that the 9th circuit rules over Texas when it is in fact the 5th circuit that does. I'm not the one spreading a fake narrative to incite fear.


Perhaps you are confused on what the word shill actually means!

--

It is. It is, but it's not the end of the world and they're not coming for your guns just yet. But it is a wake up call to show you that there are SCOTUS that are treasonous scum.

Texas falls under the 5th chief. Look again!

9th circuit strikes again.
Their votes are always about as anti-American as it gets.

Guys, hold up.

Here's the deal: Bottom line - they come for our guns, we fucking shoot them until they stop.

No burying. No hiding. No "they fell off my boat."

USE the 2nd Amendment.

Agreed. I think this is generally accepted approach to 110 million gun owners in the USA.

Verrrrrry upsetting

They are coming for our guns.

Trump is in their problem right now.

lol... it's too late to disarm America by gov decree...

Patriot in Puerto Rico repealed gun control laws , won the case in court that declared Puerto Rico Gun laws Anti-constitucional

[link to www.breitbart.com]

it dont matter what the judge what the pres or the police say

in U.S.A

you got the right to bear arms NO MATTER WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENDS

so sit back relax crack a Beer and Molon Labe

SCOTUS cannot hear second amendment or Dick act issues because all 'gun control' is written about firearms to sidestep precedent.

It's all bullshit. This applies to California. The only ppl saying otherwise are left wing sources playing pretend like they do with nothing to back it up other than libtard wet dream opinion and the right wings guys they triggered into melting down over their baseless opinion. (Which is why they won't provide links. They know we'll laugh at the source)

California got it because they actually wanted it there. It doesn't apply to any other states.

Last Edited by Merit on 06/26/2017 05:02 PM

As an American, you need to go by the Constitution, not by the words and actions of traitors.

It is the LAW OF THE LAND.

Period.

End of story.

Exactly

NOTHING MORE NOTHING LESS

fuck when are they going to understand????

He was the real Mack Daddy that Obama's crew stole for real.


The Anita Hill stuff was so many Lulz back then. Those women were social climbing swing monkeys. Good tiemz

Thank you, Merit!


--

NO, this means that states can decided if you have a right to carry your firearm in public. This has nothing to do with the right to own or buy firearms, but where you can carry them.

Excellent use of propaganda that Google brainwashed so many with.

Right. It's a states rights issue. Which all agree is how it should be yes?

That's why it's ridiculous to try and pretend places like Texas are affected by this. Really outside of the west coast and maybe Hawaii there's not any states with enough public support to pass this.

New York maybe but outside of NYC those yanks actually really like their guns democrats or not so probably not even there.

Last Edited by Merit on 06/26/2017 05:30 PM

Umh..... this will come thru...."paperwork" you going to shot mailman? No... more likely you will bend over....home loan almost paid off...children will need your support...you want to finish that classic Chevy in your garage...

The us constitution says otherwise so does the heller decision

this case has already been decided.