Challenge to Globe earthers.

Math is not a "fantasy," your OP has been debunked and furthermore, you have admitted you knew the true number when you created this thread. "Common sense" does not factor into it, reality does not care what your assumptions or "common sense" tells you.

So you don't understand math then. Got it.

The only thing you have shown is that your opening post was a lie and you knew it to be so when you made it.

Common sense logic... care to elaborate on what that is? Because by common sense logic, you are a retard.

fyi... tesla had the same arguments against the math cultists who settled for their math to say what ever is completely illogical and can never be demonstrated in real life experiments.

Danth's law.

heres reality for you...

water dont shoot out from the poles of wet ball despite your magical holy math saying gravity should only be 0.5% stronger at the poles of the wet ball.

reality dude... reality.

Spin your tennis ball at the rate of 1 revolution per day and tell me how much water flies off.

Nikola Tesla vs Astromut

Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.

Nikola Tesla

There's no reason for water to "shoot out from the poles of wet ball" given earth's considerable gravity. That would go against gravity, of course. Your assumptive statements do not dictate reality and you know this, yet you lie anyway. Sorry troll, try again later.

And you were wrong.

Gravity = 9.8 meters per second squared. 100% of the cetrifugal force is less then 1/2 of 1% of gravity. Take it all away and you won't have 100% - 50% more gravity. does basic addition and subtraction confuse you?

I'll wait OP. Dying to see the results.

all of it due to density and bouyancy acting before the effect can be prounounced.

still doesnt explain why no water fly off from the poles

Anything involving math is automatically "fantasy" to him because he thinks Tesla told him he could sleep through his math and science classes and still be able to refute all of known science and reality.

density and buoyancy are not vectors. They don't have direction. Gravity gives items weight and DOES provide a direction.

It still works even if you don't understand it.

says who and how?

Says everyone that can do the math and the many that have measured the difference between the poles and equator.
Just because YOU don't understand it doesn't mean everyone else has their head up their ass.

for some reason bouyancy and density take dense to the dense direction and light to the light direction.

but these are not real directions, same with gravity though, there are no real directions in space!

AAAHHH so thats your reality basis, not the math.

FYI, it is easily explained by the FACT atmospheric air pressure is stornger in the north than in the south!

but you need your FANTASY magic holy math to disregard this and see how you can push in your none existent spin and gravity.

I'm sure YOU thought that word salad meant something.

Could we get a dumbass to English translator in here please?

The more funny is the flat brains are using Tesla to prove their non sense and yet, Tesla believed in a globe earth.

astromut are you lying??

I think you are, cause you are smart enough to know I am only questioning the way you use your math in relation to reality, not in relation to itself.

but you are suggesting Im questioning math in relation to math.

If air pressure caused weight then every one climbing mountains would be lighter. They are not.

Air pressure decreases with altitude. That means there is always a greater air pressure on the BOTTOM of an object. If air pressure caused weight then everything would be getting pushed up.

*falsely prove

A) it doesnt really matter.

B) Im quite sure he was a flat earther

Again, you just proved I'm right.

I just wish we had something visual we could show them.

I was sincerely hoping someone here had a model I could use.

got any evidence?

yes... if the object is lighter than air it would be pushed up.
but since we are denser than air, air pressure at the north pole, only accounts for I GUESS only 0.5% increase in weight?
that is IF what you are saying is true, that actual measurements were used to measure this 0.5% increase and not just math with no observation in reality.

No, I'm not lying. I never said you were trying to refute the math properly, in fact I demanded you show where my math is wrong. You won't and you can't, because it's right. It does describe reality whether you're willing to admit it or not.

I would suggest you refrain from accusing me of lying without something to back it up, but honestly I don't care if you get yourself banned or not.

Earth is an oblate spheroid.

The centrifugal bias, strongest at equator, weakest at pooles causes the earth to bulge at the equator.

As such: when stood at the equator you have more mass between you and the opposite side of the globe.

All of this mass contributes to a slightly higher gravitational attraction to the free body.

This is however counteracted (and then some) by the centrifugal force itself acting on said body.

After all is accounted for:

If you weighed 100 pounds at the north pole on a spring scale, at the equator you would weigh 99.65 pounds, or 5.5 ounces less.

This is the reason rocket launches are slightly cheaper nearer the equator.

The earth is a globe, flat earthers are an embarrassment to human endeavour and intellect.

Go outside and watch the star movements over time.

Do the same thing on an AUS webcam.

Look how they move.