OK, Einsteintards. I accept General Theory of Relativity. No forces, only fields. Now tell us HOW COME planets got the current orbital speed?

Have you ever watched figure-skating?

Curved space might explain a body in orbit - but you still need to postulate a 'force' to make an apple fall.


Besides Electric Universe Theory has it all covered - gravity turns out to be the cumulative effect of atomic dipole effects.



[link to youtu.be (secure)]

Thanks for the YT link. I identified myself with Wallace Thornhill in the first 5 minutes. I'm shure I'll enjoy the rest of the conference.

My work here, the last two months, bashing Einstein's work and also Quantum Mechanics, looks like the first steps he did almost 40 years ago. I'm sorry I'll never be able to follow his steps as I'm almost his age.

I'm bashing fake science here because it is fun and because I'm fed up with all the garbage out there. Now I have some time free and the initial knowledge to do what I do here.

But mostly is for fun, to discuss with severely indoctrinated people (on science) and create controversy around exactly what Tornhill is saying: Postulates without any chance to be proven for 100 years. Also, I like to call this group of parasites The Science Club.

Don't dare to question some Science Club's postulates like the standard model of elementary particles or Einstein's GTR or you will not be able to get even a janitor's job at any University. Also forget chances to get published on "Scientific Journals". The Club censors them.

Special relativity only works in an inertial frame. The big bang is a non-inertial frame.

Except it isn't.

None of what you posted is true, so I'm sure Einstein wouldn't have much to say about it.

Einstein never said gravity wasn't a force. He also said this:

There could be no fairer destiny for any physical theory than that it should point the way to a more comprehensive theory in which it lives on as a limiting case.

Electric Universe explains everything.


[link to www.thunderbolts.info (secure)]

From one of so many sites that appears when googling: "did einstein said gravity isnt a force" I selected this for his simple explanation.

Please, be cathegoric with things you really know. If not, be humble and doubt!




[link to science.howstuffworks.com]

Albert Einstein, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921, contributed an alternate theory of gravity in the early 1900s. It was part of his famous General Theory of Relativity, and it offered a very different explanation from Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. Einstein didn't believe gravity was a force at all; he said it was a distortion in the shape of space-time, otherwise known as "the fourth dimension" (see How Special Relativity Works to learn about space-time).

Basic physics states that if there are no external forces at work, an object will always travel in the straightest possible line. Accordingly, without an external force, two objects travelling along parallel paths will always remain parallel. They will never meet.

But the fact is, they do meet. Particles that start off on parallel paths sometimes end up colliding. Newton's theory says this can occur because of gravity, a force attracting those objects to one another or to a single, third object. Einstein also says this occurs due to gravity -- but in his theory, gravity is not a force. It's a curve in space-time.

Everything about Einstein is BS.

All "his" (he was a FtM tranny - most obvious one ever seen) theories are math-based and unfalsifiable.

Unfalsifiability makes his shit NON-science.

ALL scientific theories MUST be falsifiable!

Have you ever stopped being paid for being a shill?

You haven't "bashed" anything. All you have shown is you are a fool who doesn't really understand what he developed and you do not know the history. You also do not know how science is done. Yes it builds on other people's work. That is a given. Your characterization of Einstein as stealing others work is nothing but pure prejudice.

The very first line of The Formal Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity says this.

In recent years I have worked, in part together with my friend Grossman, on a [1] generalization of the theory of relativity.

This is what Lorentz said about Einstein:

I considered my time transformation only as a heuristic working hypothesis. So the theory of relativity is really solely Einstein's work. And there can be no doubt that he would have conceived it even if the work of all his predecessors in the theory of this field had not been done at all. His work is in this respect independent of the previous theories.

Never does Einstein say it isn't a force. Your quote says it, but those are not Einstein's words. Einstein is explaining what a force is, a curvature of space-time. Newton never explained what a force is, it just something that exists and we can define the properties of. There is a difference between contact forces and non-contact forces like gravity. They are difficult to explain, this goes for electromagnetic forces also. We cannot explain them as a simple push or a pull. Electrical forces, gravity, and magnetism are explained as distortions in space. The fields exist and encompass all of space. Einstein furthered this understanding by saying they are distortions in space and time.

Learn what the scientific definition of theory is. That isn't it.

Deformed space time IS gravity

Simple: the programmer programmed them at their current orbital speeds in the simulation base code.

Trying to explain basic mechanics makes one a shill now?
Well, thanks for the compliment.

Why are you anti-science?

Watch how the community rewrites history in a convenient way.

Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Albert Einstein Archives

[link to www.albert-einstein.org]


Then read this:

Albert Einstein's 1916 Review Article on General Relativity
by Tilman Sauer

[link to arxiv.org (secure)]

Then, read this. Later, keep digging. Almost all is out there.
I write here for pleasure and don't care what others think.

History: Einstein was no lone genius

[link to www.nature.com]

Easy explanation - general relativity is wrong.

It is used in your GPS. Is your GPS wrong?

What the hell are you talking about?

:Pepe540:

Think differently for once, if you are not severely indoctrinated with 100 years of deviations on the path of scientific discoveries. Read the info I linked and think to whom the hoax of the century favours: Eisntein, genius of genius! Are you kidding me? He was a lazy dog, ignorant thief and natural con artist who mastered scams with his charming, deceiving personality. A proffesional begger since his high-school years. RESEARCH THIS and COMPARE notes with what says the site of Jerusalem University (a custody organization for Einstein's name).

Mathematics is above physics for the last 100 years. Rational thought, intuition and practical experiments are left behind the power of theoretical postulates and mathematical proofs (not physical), leaving science to rely or math (that should be a TOOL) as the path to discoveries.

Making assumptions over assumptions and tuning math to fit the assumptions is the cancer that is killing scientifical developments. Day after day, more questions than answers appears as theoretical scientists try to fit math to postulates, without even thinking on practical proof. Science, as was known by centuries, died about 90 years ago by the hand of mathe-physicists. This doesn't happens with applied sciences and engineering, where intuition, luck and practical experiments produces the things that make the current world.

I have nothing else to say here. This is not the place to go any further.

Good luck in your way. I'll follow mine.

I gave you the quote from Lorentz who did not think Einstein was a "thief". There is nothing in the links that isn't already known and nothing that suggests he is a "thief". You are misguided.

There is nothing wrong with creating more questions. In fact it is a good thing. No one said we know everything. If we do not attempt to answer one question, we do not find the new questions and the new discoveries.

The problem is that we have never been outside the van Allen radiation belt.

The further away from earth you get the electromagnetic function is removed " aka gravity"

Planets and stars cant even be proven, space science can not be proven. The majority of people are trusting people that control your everyday life .

Planets and stars could be a lens illusion ,reflections or otherwise.

Nothing on this earth has ever been past the radiation belt.

Its all a lie based on what people believe is fact because they see it in a telescope lens. LIght is a funny funny thing.

:tptbmine:

Last Edited by messagehalted on 07/22/2017 11:12 PM