Did Elon Musk Just Confirm Moon Landings Were Faked?

Yeah, bonehead I guess they just shit the rocks and elements they brought back located at museums all over the world and studied by credible scientist as well.

The Russians KNOW that 911 was a false flag, yet they fail to expose it.


The Russians KNOW that it was impossible to put a man on the Moon in 1969, yet they fail to expose it.

Ok I spent my career around military pilots - something is so freaking off about this guy, and his tick - that little head tick he seems to have going on. WTF - serious MKUltra here -

These do not seem like confident former military pilots - they seem like grown up special needs kids.

the earth is FLAT. "Space" does not exist. There is no fucking Mars. So no, he will never actually go there. It will be fully faked.

Yep, these don't seem like men proud of their accomplishments. Their body language SCREAMS deception. I used to think that moon hoax believers were retarded, now I know I was retarded for believing the official narrative.

I can't get a cell phone signal or WIFI in certain parts of my house...but people believe they can send live footage from space to earth--HOW MANY YEARS AGO?


BAHAHAHAHAHA!

AND Don't give me the analogue or short-range crap.

Well, the moon has much lower gravity at the surface and above that Mars has. Safely stabilizing for one is vastly different than the other. All but the last lander on Mars have arrived via airbags. Once we start safely landing there remotely via safer methods we can start sending humans.

Hmmm. I see a cherry-picked clip taken from a long briefing during which there are plenty of other times they were smiling and laughing.

the earth is FLAT. "Space" does not exist. There is no fucking Mars. So no, he will never actually go there. It will be fully faked.

"Elon Musk just announced that SpaceX abandons propulsive landing plans for Red Dragon mission to Mars.

In my opinion, we should not be surprised.

NASA supposedly used propulsive landing for the Apollo missions to the moon...in 1969.

An unusual press conference. These guys don't seem very excited to be sharing about their visit to the moon.

Hmmm. I see a cherry-picked clip taken from a long briefing during which there are plenty of other times they were smiling and laughing.

Yeah, nervous laughter / gallows humor. If you watch the whole thing, it just proves the point more; it is obvious that they are not comfortable with what they are saying.

Watch the whole cherry-picked clip? Or the whole briefing. I've seen the latter and it is NOT obvious as you claim. But I doubt you've watched it.

Millennial detected.

I watched the whole thing years ago.

3:50 a pop.

doubtful

Wrong. They said they cannot travel through the region of space traveled by Orion EFT-1, and that is accurate given Apollo's specs. The trajectory taken by Apollo avoided the most intense parts of the Van Allen belts. Orion EFT-1 flew right through it. Here's Apollo's trajectory:

Using SPENVIS, here is the dose expected for an Apollo astronaut sitting inside an Apollo spacecraft with about 7-8 g/cm^2 areal density on the trajectory taken by Apollo to the moon:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
That dose isn't dangerous at all.

With that said, you cannot send astronauts on an Apollo command module through the same region on the same trajectory as Orion EFT-1 without risking the astronauts developing mild symptoms of radiation poisoning. Orion EFT-1 took it right through the most intense region of radiation right over the equator.

Here is the expected dose if you were to send Apollo astronauts in an Apollo command module on the same trajectory as Orion EFT-1's final orbit:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
Nearly 30 rads of radiation. At that dose you are approaching the threshold at which you may start to exhibit mild symptoms of radiation poisoning according to the CDC:

"Mild symptoms may be observed with doses as low as 0.3 Gy or 30 rads."
[link to www.bt.cdc.gov]

Still won't kill you, but it might just make you sick if you fly Orion EFT-1's trajectory with the older Apollo capsule and normally your mission would just be getting started. The electronics on the Apollo spacecraft were less susceptible to radiation though. Computers were also in charge of a lot less of the Apollo spacecraft, and were built using core memory that generally could not experience a "bit flip" due to radiation the way modern memory chips do.

Orion's missions will likely involve using solar electric propulsion, which is much lower thrust than Apollo, which means more time spent in the belts than Apollo and possibly in less inclined orbits (or with an argument of perigee that puts it over the equator at apogee as the orbit is slowly raised) like Orion EFT-1. That's something you couldn't do with the Apollo capsule safely, but that's not what they did for Apollo.

I watched the whole conference. It was obvious those guys had problems with the subject.

And don't give me the old line "Well, Armstrong is really a shy guy", etc.

Watching the whole thing does not improve your case. Their behavior is similar through the entire interview.

Anyone without an agenda can watch it and see for themselves.

"Elon Musk just announced that SpaceX abandons propulsive landing plans for Red Dragon mission to Mars.

In my opinion, we should not be surprised.

NASA supposedly used propulsive landing for the Apollo missions to the moon...in 1969.

I ask you to please click the following hyperlinks to read three articles, carefully, watch one 3-1/3 minute video, closely, and then draw your own conclusions about the Apollo Moon landings that we are told occured nearly 50 years ago."

Read the rest here: [link to www.zerohedge.com]

actually we did land on the moon but were meet by large alien ships that told us to gather a few rocks and not to come back.

I disagree. But in any case I personally feel that if I were in their shoes in that conference I would be somewhat subdued as well. This was not ours after they got back. This was after they spent weeks in quarantine following their return. That's plenty of time for the adrenaline to die down and come to the realization that you will never fly in space again or do anything as amazing as what you just did. To me I think that would be quite a downer. If you disagree fine but that doesn't constitute proof of a hoax.

Let the people view the evidence and draw their own conclusions.


"This was after they spent weeks in quarantine following their return."

Yeah, those debriefing sessions in the "quarantine" must have been devastating.


"... come to the realization that you will never fly in space again or do anything as amazing as what you just did."

Oh, boo-hoo! So sad!