CORRUPTION NEVER ENDS: Kamala Harris Refuses TEN TIMES To Answer If A Convicted Felon Should Be Allowed To Serve In The Senate

I don't think she is a natural born citizen, her mother is from India and her father from a British colony. I don't think they were US citizens when she was born, but not super sure. Not real sure that matters after the Kenyan Clown, either.


Convicted felon serve in the senate?

We have so many engaging in felonious activity who will never face indictment it is somewhat of a moot point, all sarcasm aside.

You'd think Harris's immediate answer would be "Of COURSE not!!" The fact that she'd ignore ten times a simple question with an obvious answer suggests that Harris is just another corrupt progressive.

And we shouldn't forget that Kamala Harris also recently complained Sheriff Joe Arpaio shouldn't have been pardoned because "he was convicted of a crime."

What about disbarred lawyers?

Getting disbarred is a trick in itself, but one president and one almost-president, have been disbarred.

I am not favor of asking the same question over and over. It is an annoying tactic no matter which side does it.

Of course she did!! She is a felon just hasn't been convicted yet.

All Congressturds and D.C. hacks amaze me at how they refuse to answer the simplest questions. Why worry? She can just be like Hillary and give one answer and later say what she really meant was something else.

:Swamp470:

Yeah just want to slap that guy regardless

People seem to think that because they can ask a question that it must be answered. It is like people that think because they are born they are entitled to something.

She is such a fucking embarrassment.

Harris could've easily prevented the repeated question by simply giving an answer the first time it was asked.

Harris supposedly works for the people. It's her job to answer questions, especially if she's going to be a presidential candidate. You want to slap THE REPORTER for asking an important question like that? You find no fault with her for refusing to answer?

All the esteemed Sheriff Arpaio did was continue enforcing immigration laws that have been on the books for many years.

Where he got into trouble was when a liberal judge charged him with contempt of court. He was charged because the lib judge had ordered him essentially, to stop enforcing the immigration laws.

He was doing crime prevention sweeps and then checking ID's to see if people were legal to be here.

My guess is Kamala Harris should not be involved in politics or government at any level.

Democrat=crookedest of the crooked ALWAYS..a few Repubs are probably somewhat honest

That's because she should be in jail.amala

"Harris is now under criminal investigation for aiding and abetting a major pedophile ring operating in the state of California, which has led to the arrest of the Assistant Attorney General for the State of California."
- Tom Heneghan briefings.

Fake news.

Your right! After the third time, guilty as charged!

Willie Brown's old squeeze.

I liked his style.

Kamala, on the other, slept her way to the middle.

Regarding Arpaio, this video gives a detailed explanation why his conviction was complete bullshit:

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Last Edited by FromRussiaWithLube on 09/11/2017 08:04 PM

She was born in the US. If neither parent was a US citizen, it might make a difference, but probably not with today's mentalities.

When she runs in 2020, she will get 99% of the Black vote, 75% of the women's votes, probably half of the Hispanic votes, and all the liberal's votes.

She could be a shoo-in for the presidency. Doesn't look good for the constitution.

She won't get voted in. People are sick of the liberal bullshit.

Once you've done your time, your slate should be clean. So yes they should be allowed to serve.

The real problem is the felonious senators who have not been caught, which is just about ALL of them

Now THAT's interesting!!

Democrats haven't relied on getting voted in for years.
Possibly decades.
They get installed, like a colostomy bag.

Last Edited by The Comedian :D on 09/11/2017 09:02 PM

Be realistic, if some guy was machine gunning a "gotcha" question at you 10 times in the most annoying way possible you would be pretty miffed.

People seem to think that if they pay taxes that gives them some right to exclaim they pay someones salary in the government and boss them around. Just like they think, if they are in some kind of elected office, that it means they are a slave to any ole riffraff that wants to verbally assault them with gotcha questions (while videoing no less).

She has as much right to not answer in such a scenario as the riffraff think he is entitled to an answer.

In such situations the only way to win is to not engage. Other riffraff will be like Ooooohhh Loooook she didn't answer, but reasonable people will see the situation for what it is.

If she is such a scumbag as is being insinuated, she will eventually show her true colors without being ambushed with a loaded gotcha question randomly in public

Nearly all politicians are thieves and con artists or worse.

The longer they are in office or just government the more corrupt and mendacious they are.

Politicians are a distinct criminal class. Hat tip Mark Twain and America has the best politicians money can buy.

What is gotcha about the question? The answer is a simple No, I don't think a convicted felon should "serve" in the senate.

Let's be "realistic." "Should a convicted felon be allowed to serve in the Senate?" is NOT a "gotcha" question. It's actually a basic legal and moral question, one that Harris -- if she wasn't already corrupt herself -- should've been happy to answer, simply and promptly.

"Reasonable people" will see her avoidance as a clear indication that she wants to remain supportive of fellow Democrat and progressive Senator Menendez, who's probably going to be convicted on corruption charges.