A white E4-B (the most advanced, US military command and control plane) is seen in this CNN footage flying a few miles from the WTC just as the alleged Flight 175 crashes into the South Tower.
Now ask yourself this: did this so-called "Doomsday plane" just happen to be flying over Manhattan when Flight 175 flew into the South Tower? And over Washington D.C. when Flight 77 was supposed to crash into the Pentagon? What are the chances of it being coincidently a few miles from the crash scene just as Flight 175 hits the South Tower? Or did this 'flying Pentagon' guide into the tower a remote-controlled plane masquerading as a hijacked plane? We know this plane was one of several such planes participating in Operation Global Guardian, the umbrella military exercise that practises Armageddon every year. Usually, this takes place in October. But for some reason that has not been explained by the Pentagon, the schedule in 2001 was altered to a few days before September 11. Congressman, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) made a formal inquiry through official channels, but was told the Air Force knew nothing about this plane flying that day!! Not even the Air Force knew that one of its most important planes was flying at that time? Give me a break! There's a cover-up going on. We need to know if this plane had taken off BEFORE the planes crashed on 9/11, or whether it took to the air in response to the events unfolding that day in order to direct the jet fighters that, of course, never arrived! Was this military exercise, re-scheduled for September (the only time such a change has happened), used as a convenient cover for coordinating the attacks in New York and Washington?
Anonymous Coward User ID: 215395 4/14/2007 8:23 AM
Re: CNN footage of most advanced electronic warfare plane flying near WTC as Flight 175 hit South Tower
better watch em soon....the police state is getting much more aggressive in censoring these 911 videos...a lot of them aren't lasting very long.....download and save !
Anonymous Coward User ID: 214292 4/14/2007 8:26 AM
Re: CNN footage of most advanced electronic warfare plane flying near WTC as Flight 175 hit South Tower
well...I'd say "the cat is out of the bag" so to speak....but the neocons who ordered the "new pearl harbor" are still running the show....that's the bottom line.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 218975 4/14/2007 8:41 AM
Re: CNN footage of most advanced electronic warfare plane flying near WTC as Flight 175 hit South Tower
well...I'd say "the cat is out of the bag" so to speak....but the neocons who ordered the "new pearl harbor" are still running the show....that's the bottom line.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 215395
Yes. But if the normal political process is not going to remove them and if the normal legal process is not going to get them investigated and prosecuted, then how do we stop them from carrying out Act 2 of 9/11?
Bush was flown on 9/11 to Offutt AFB near Omaha, Nebraska, home of STRATCOM, where Operation Global Guardian was being conducted, and the base for the four E4-Bs. Curiously, so were a number of CEOs of companies in the WTC1 and WTC2 who would have been killed had they been in their offices. Ostensibly it was to watch a Charity Classic golf and tennis tournament held at the base and organised by billionaire Warren Buffett [link to www.robertpmiles.com]
Mr. Buffett was reportedly at his home in Omaha, Nebraska watching TV when he heard about the terrorist attacks. He was getting ready to host his "last annual golf charity event" which just happened to be at the U.S. Strategic Command headquarters located at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha. Offutt AFB is, coincidentally, where President G. W. Bush flew to on Air Force One later in the day for "safety." This early golf charity event hosted by Mr. Buffett was to include celebrities, professional athletes, and a small group of business leaders in which one of these business leaders became a very lucky person.
This very lucky person was Ann Tatlock, the CEO of Fiduciary Trust Co. International. Now what made Mrs. Tatlock such a lucky person for being invited to this charity event that morning? Mrs. Tatlock not only works in the World Trade Center, but her offices were right where Flight 175 crashed into the South WTC Tower. She was escorted by military officers to an officer's lounge with TV to watch it happen.
One interesting note about Ann Tatlock is that she is a trustee of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) along with former Secretary of State and current Carlyle Group advisor James A. Baker III who's law firm, Baker Botts LLP, is defending Saudi Arabia against the trillion dollar lawsuit filed by the families of 9/11 victims. HHMI also employed Don C. Wiley, one of the dozen distinguished microbiologists that have mysteriously died within five months of each other shortly after 9/11.
done for User ID: 73457 4/14/2007 11:47 AM
Re: CNN footage of most advanced electronic warfare plane flying near WTC as Flight 175 hit South Tower
Mr. Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. has a subsidiary company called FlightSafety International Inc., a flight training school. One of the so-called hijackers" - Abdulrahman Al Omari, trained at this school before supposedly crashing AA Flight 11 into the North Tower.
Also interesting to note is that Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, another flight training school that reportedly trained at least one of the alleged 9/11 hijackers, Waleed Al Shehr, has ties with both Buffett's FlightSafety International Inc. and NetJets along with a lot of other companies "indirectly involved" with 9/11.
Mr. Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. has large stock holdings in a company called SunTrust Banks, Inc. This is one of the banks in which most of the alleged 9/11 hijackers reportedly set up bank accounts using fake social security numbers.
Oooh, and a NetJets executive company jet owned by Warren Buffett's parent company Berkshire Hathaway was "tracking" Flight 93 when it crashed in an open field in Shanksville, PA.
A white E4-B (the most advanced, US military command and control plane) is seen in this CNN footage flying a few miles from the WTC just as the alleged Flight 175 crashes into the South Tower.
They intercepted NO planes.
Inside job.
Case closed.
Quoting: 65 books a year 206988
I agree this is the most simple expression of guilt on 911. One thing to add though, the USA north east including Washington DC is the most protected airspace on earth and for a long time, over 1 hour, not one of four jets were intercepted.
ok, i looked at the rense pics, and the grain of the emulsion kind of blurs the details enough that you really cant tell if its an e4 or a civi 747.....however, let's assume it's an e4......by the timelines that have been published, the airforce should have been under full alert by then....but no fighters intercepting, right? kind of makes sense they would scramble an e4 or 2 to designate bogies.....why would the presence of an e4 be considered malevolent? i'm not trying to poke holes in your theory, just trying to understand the underlying reasoning, and find a logical counter-argument, and see which floats higher in the water.....my technique for separating wheat from chaff
Disclaimer: This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality
or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every
effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually
review each and every one of the more than 10,000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis.
The content of post
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in
no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of
the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or
administration of GodlikeProductions.
This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please visit: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.
Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.
