Users Online Now: 885 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 89,606
Pageviews Today: 207,484	Threads Today: 207	Posts Today: 3,532
09:27 AM

News

Back to Forum

Post New Thread

View Favorites

Warning: might require too much thought

RSS

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 247385
6/9/2007 12:47 AM
Report abusive post

Warning: might require too much thought

Quote

[link to www.familysecuritymatters.org]

Is justice really “blind?” Or does the system treat public figures unequally, depending upon whether they are conservative or liberal? FSM Contributing Editor Frank Salvato has an explosive commentary exposing this outrageous dichotomy. Has justice been politicized?

The Incredible Judicial Disparity: Berger v. Libby

By Frank Salvato

If you needed any more proof that the American judicial system is completely – and alarmingly – subjective, look no further than the disparity between the sentences imposed on Sandy Berger and I. Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby. In Washington DC’s version of The Peoples’ Court, it would seem that the deciding factors in how severe a sentence one gets depends on political party affiliation - the severity of the crime be damned.

This past Tuesday US District Judge Reggie B. Walton, a Bush 43 appointee, sentenced former Vice Presidential Chief of Staff I. Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby to 30 months in prison and fined him $250,000 for obstruction of justice and lying to a federal agent. Walton said he saw no good reason to allow Libby to remain free pending appeal. Walton also required Libby to serve two years probation upon release from prison.
Libby’s conviction stems from an overly aggressive investigation into the alleged “leaking” of a covert CIA agent’s name, Valerie Plame. Plame, the wife of the irritatingly smug Joseph Wilson, had sent him on a non-White House sanctioned exploratory mission to Niger, which, as Christopher Hitchens aptly points out, inadvertently validated President Bush’s claim that Saddam Hussein had been shopping for yellowcake uranium in Niger, a point the agenda-driven media dropped at the Wilson’s allegation of Plame’s outing.

As Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald investigated the matter it became quite clear to even the most intellectually challenged among us, that no one in the White House had anything to do with Ms. Plame’s alleged exposure as a Non-Official Cover operative (NOC). In fact, not only had Robert Novak and Richard Armitage informed Fitzgerald that it was in truth Armitage who had mentioned Plame’s name, the facts cast serious doubt as to whether she was considered covert at all, her cover had been blown years early by convicted spy Aldrich Ames.

Through it all, Fitzgerald’s relentless pursuit of someone to charge with something uncovered only that Libby was guilty of not being able to recall who had mentioned Plame’s name to him. Libby testified that he heard Plame's name from Tim Russert of NBC News when, in fact, he learned of Plame's identify from other government officials. The former chief of staff – who it should be pointed out was preoccupied by operating at his post while our nation was at war – gave conflicting accounts to FBI agents and in testimony to the Grand Jury.

It bears mentioning here that the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO), is calling for Plame to explain “differences” in her various accounts of how her husband came to be sent on an exploratory mission to Niger in the first place, her diverse accounts having been given to the CIA's inspector general, Senate investigators and a House committee in March. We will wait to see if Plame is imprisoned for having a bad memory or whether she gets a book deal.

For Libby’s bad memory – and for not outing a non-covert CIA analyst – he will spend two and a half years of his life, which has up until now been spent as a distinguished public servant, behind bars and become a quarter of a million dollars poorer in the process.

By contrast, and even though the crime committed was infinitely more dubious, Sandy Berger is still free to roam the streets – and the National Archives.

In October of 2003, former Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger, in preparation for his 9/11 Commission testimony, removed and then destroyed unique and classified documents pertaining to the Clinton Administration’s knowledge of terrorist threats to the United States.
Berger described his removal of the unique documents initially as “an honest mistake.” But as details emerged, courtesy of a report titled, Sandy Berger's Theft of Classified Documents: Unanswered Questions compiled by the US House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform, it became clear that Berger’s efforts were premeditated and tantamount to an attempt at obstructing the 9/11 Commission’s investigation.

Comparing the two cases, you would think that Sandy Berger would be in the cell next to ‘Scooter’ Libby, the one welcoming Libby into the minimum security federal corrections facility where the politically elite serve their time. Additionally, you would think that Berger would be the one wishing Libby well as he watched him walk out of prison after 30 months, Berger remaining to finish his sentence. But the US Judicial System isn’t that equitable, especially when politics is concerned.
Where Patrick Fitzgerald’s ego-driven investigation culminated in his need to charge someone to with something (an honest and thorough investigation could never result in no charges being filed, right?), those investigating Sandy Berger’s crime against the people of the United States were, it appears, motivated solely by political loyalty, having been placed in their positions by the Clinton Administration.

US Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine, Deputy Assistant US Attorney General Bruce Swartz, Chief of the USJD Counterterrorism Section John Dion and Howard Sklamberg, USJD trial attorney from the public integrity unit, were all principally involved in the Berger investigation and were all either appointed by Bill Clinton or were holdovers from the Clinton Administration.

As a result of the incredibly apathetic USJD investigation and prosecution of Sandy Berger’s theft and destruction of unique and classified documents from the National Archives, and as the result of a plea bargain authorized by the USJD, Berger agreed to a $10,000 fine, a revocation of his security clearance for three years and a lie detector test, which to this day has not been administered. This sentence was augmented by US Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson who increased the fine to $50,000 and added two years probation and 100 hours of community service. Robinson said, “The court finds that the fine [recommended by government prosecutors] is inadequate because it doesn't reflect the seriousness of the offense.”

Berger, additionally, forfeited his license to practice law to avoid being cross-examined about his illegal activities by the Board on Bar Counsel, a forfeiture that effectively ends any inquiry into Berger’s crimes.
In the end, ‘Scooter Libby’ will be spending the next two and a half years behind bars for not being able to correctly remember who committed the non-crime of not outing a non-covert CIA analyst whose recollections are as various as the media outlets and congressional fact finding committees she recounted them to. Meanwhile, Sandy Berger gets to have lunch at Spago whenever he wants and after he stole, then destroyed, unique and significant documents committed to the United States National Archives, documents pertaining to the most devastating slaughter of human beings on American soil ever.

The inequity of these two sentences, the egomaniacal piety of the investigations, both aggressive and apathetic, demonstrates that the legal system in the United States of America – and especially the US Justice Department – has been politicized to the point of corruption.
In an atmosphere where judicial veracity and the integrity of the prosecutorial process have been compromised, no justice can be found.
“Our country is now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction, to wit: by consolidation [of power] first, and then corruption, its necessary consequence.” – Thomas Jefferson

Billy Joel
User ID: 221336
6/9/2007 12:48 AM

Re: Warning: might require too much thought	Quote

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 247385 (OP)
6/9/2007 12:51 AM

Re: Warning: might require too much thought	Quote
ignorant and apathetic i don't know and i don't care Then you deserve to lose it all.

Billy Joel
User ID: 221336
6/9/2007 1:05 AM

Re: Warning: might require too much thought	Quote

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 246951
6/9/2007 1:07 AM

Re: Warning: might require too much thought	Quote
For God's sake, live by the rules. They aren't that bad.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 247385 (OP)
6/9/2007 1:23 AM

Re: Warning: might require too much thought

Quote

Here's the essence of the situation in a clip from the Dennis Prager Show.

"Dennis talks to Brian Carney, member of the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, about the G8 conference going on in Germany now. They discuss the sources of the charges against Lewis Libby and the likelihood that President Bush will pardon him… Dennis rails against a justice system that creates prosecutorial abuse of power cases like the Libby travesty, the phony Duke Lacrosse Rape case and others."

Start listening around the 11:00 minute mark, but most importantly at 16:35.

[link to www.townhall.com]

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21470
6/9/2007 1:31 AM

Re: Warning: might require too much thought	Quote
For God's sake, live by the rules. They aren't that bad. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 246951 tell that to the people that make them

Back to Forum

Post New Thread

View Favorites

Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 10,000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis.

The content of post on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Privacy Policy - Terms Of Use

Copyright 1999-2010 © GodLikeProductions.com

Page generated in 0.033s (5 queries)