Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,135 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,662,265
Pageviews Today: 2,196,374Threads Today: 542Posts Today: 10,073
06:11 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !

 
I AM THE ROPE...
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 249502
United States
06/09/2007 11:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
4 parts !

September Clues...pretty amazing !

Thanks to LightEye !

[link to www.livevideo.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 162114
United States
06/09/2007 11:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
OP you're a day late and a dollar short! This BS has already been posted twice by other gullible idiots.

And for the record, no I don't think 19 arabs managed to pull off 911 without some major help...and I'm not talking about Osama.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 249502
United States
06/09/2007 11:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
Thanks for the re-wind. I had only watched Part 1...watching
2 now. Ah, I don't know what to say...
Fonts

User ID: 360036
Canada
01/23/2008 12:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
I thought September Clues Was Great, Real or not!
Where is a DVD download so i can share with my friends?

I do find quality with 911 Videos Sucks Ass Real Bad, Where Are all the origional Shots of 911? every Video I have Seen Has Been Re Edited and has pixilation.. can tell me All the Videos Captured on 911 were from cheap cell phones?... is that what the big media stations were using>? a 100 dollar digi cam?

Whers the good quality Videos??????

and the DVD download for september clues!
Chattermouse
User ID: 261468
United States
06/03/2010 10:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
Don't buy any DVDs of this, the creator Simon Shack doesn't sell them as he is not doing this for money, unlike agent "Anthony Lawson," a shill who made a pathetic video attempting to discredit September Clues and then tried to sell it as September Clues on eBay.
The best place to download the real September Clues is [link to www.septemberclues.info] the highest quality ones are parts A-H, epilogue and addendum.
Chatamouse
User ID: 261468
United States
06/07/2010 09:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
The ~10 minute sections are of higher quality than parts 1 and 2. Bump.
chattermouse
User ID: 261468
United States
06/22/2010 08:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
the highest quality clips are in AVI. [link to www.septclues.com]
chatemouse
User ID: 261468
United States
06/23/2010 08:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
and of course the main point of this research is the fact that no commercial aircraft crashed into the wtc, the pentagon, or in Shanksville on September 11 2001.
chattermouse
User ID: 261468
United States
06/26/2010 10:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
this is from page 11 of the "9/11 and September Clues" thread in the "Big Ones" subforum at [link to www.septemberclues.info]

*

9/11 : A BRIEF SUMMARY OF EVENTS

by Simon Shack, may 2010


A- On Tuesday, September 11, 2001 the entire World Trade Center Complex was destroyed or terminally damaged (9 buildings in all). Powerful explosives were employed to achieve this purpose. The area was most likely fully evacuated to avoid casualties. The demolition work started at around 10AM behind a thick smokescreen which was raised to keep it safely out of view from NewYorkers. The 9 buildings destroyed were: WTC1, WTC2, WTC3, WTC4, WTC5, WTC6, WTC7, The Deutsche Bank and the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox church.

B- On TV, a 102-minute film told the world a different story: The physical destruction of the WTC complex was blamed on two passenger jets. It was an entirely pre-fabricated “Hollywood” production created to substitute the real-life events in Manhattan that morning. The computer-animated footage featured repetitive aerial views (seemingly TV-helicopter images) of the smoking WTC towers. All the TV networks showed these dull images for the duration of the event. The world’s TV audience, led to believe they were watching real news footage from Manhattan, cursed the “foreign terrorists” which reportedly hijacked those planes.

C- The film included but a few moments of ‘spectacular footage’, most notably a 16-second approach of an apparent airplane (“FLIGHT175”). It was split in short sequences aired in seamless succession by the 5 major US TV networks. The most memorable sight for the world TV audience was the final, 2-second cut of “FLIGHT 175” striking WTC2, as aired by ABC and CNN. It showed a black airplane-silhouette disappearing behind WTC1 and, apparently, exploding inside the hiddenWTC2. (a crude piece of computer-animation).

D- Earlier on, WTC1 had reportedly been struck by another jet (a so-called “FLIGHT11”- never shown on TV that morning). However, the inexplicable lack of required airport logs and obligatory aviation data for both “FLIGHT11” and “FLIGHT175” suggests that they simply did not exist. No black boxes or registered airplane parts were ever recovered.

E- The tower collapses were also computer animations – and an integral part of the 102min film. These were the most demanding digital film sequences yet an essential part of the hoax. The strange-looking tower collapses were just an over-the-top artistic license allowed to its creators for a desired shock & awe effect. The real-life WTC destruction took place behind a smokescreen and was never captured on film. The September Clues imagery analyses have methodically exposed the multiple signs of doctoring of all the existing imagery of the collapse videos.

F- Electromagnetic counter-measures ensured that no private cameras functioned that morning. The EMP/HERF technology is part of the most advanced military research in modern warfare. Its development has accounted for the Pentagon’s largest source of R&D funding for the last decades.

G- The only reality of the day was the convenient disposal of the obsolete, asbestos-filled WTC complex. There were no hijacked jets. Extensive research has failed to identify their alleged 266 passengers. An overwhelming body of evidence suggests that the twin towers were most likely empty and that the alleged 9/11 victims were fictitious identities generated through a computer database. In conclusion, 9/11 was but a psy-op designed to build a pretext for war and a window of opportunity to enact a number of hugely profitable financial scams.
34

User ID: 1012548
United States
06/26/2010 10:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
I don't like simonshack..he isn't very friendly with people who disagree with his theory.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1013938
United Kingdom
06/26/2010 10:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
this what happened

Thread: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****

Thread: Meet Tom Sullivan... another nail in the "official 9/11" coffin... (Page 2)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1013938
United Kingdom
06/26/2010 10:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
oh DO come on OP, is this the best u can come up with after 10 years???

1. aluminium planes simply cannot penetrate the 2 buildings as depicted in the teevee clips

2. wtc 1 2 and 7 (and the marriot htl) were brought down by 3 x 150kt subterranean nukes, this is wht the buldings came down at almost freefall speed, because the nuke shockwaves pulverised the buildings and all contents into micro particles of dust

3. the pentagram was hit by a 7 ton missile, which did not explode, it simpley penetrated right through to a courtyard area

[link to www.dkhalezov.com]

see the current glp thread, dimitri will laugh at this thread, pls do not muddy the waters any further wit this crapola
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1013938


Thanks, and yes, people who have not as yet seen the Khalesov interview as well as "September Clues 9/11" etc. should do so to understand, finally and forever, that NO planes hit ANY buildings on 9/11.

9/11 was a CGI extravaganza (a lousy one at that) inflicted on the world by the US military, US mainstream media and US Gov. and Israhell.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1013938
United Kingdom
06/26/2010 07:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
ttt
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1013938
United Kingdom
06/26/2010 08:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC:

1. Pulverization of 99% of concrete into ultra fine dust as recorded by official studies. Concrete dust was created instantly throughout the towers when the fusion device million degree heat rapidly expanded water vapour 1000-fold in the concrete floors.

2. Superheated steels ablating (vaporizing continuously as they fall) as seen in video clips of the towers collapsing. This requires uniform temperatures roughly twice that of thermite. Conventional demolition or explosive charges (thermate, rdx, hdx etc.) cannot transfer heath so rapidly that the steel goes above it's boiling temperature.

3. 22 ton outer wall steel sections ejected 200 meters into the winter garden. Cutting charges cannot eject heavy steels and throwing charges cannot provide the energy required without heavy, solid surface mounts.

4. 330 ton section of outer wall columns ripping off side of tower. Cutting charges cannot eject heavy steels linked together and throwing charges cannot provide the energy required without very heavy, solid surfaces to mount those charges.

5. Molten ponds of steel at the bottom of elevator shafts (WTC1, WTC2, WTC7). Massive heath loads have been present at the lower parts of these high-rise buildings. As one of the witnesses after seeing the flow of metals declared: "no one will be found alive".

6. The spire behaviour (stands for 20-30 seconds, evaporates and goes down, steel dust remains in the air where the spire was). The spire did not stand because it lost its durability when the joints vaporized.

7. Sharp spikes in seismograph readings (Richter 2.1 and 2.3) occurred at the beginning of collapse for both towers. Short duration and high power indicate an explosive event.

8. A press weighting 50 tons disappeared from a basement floor of Twin Towers and was never recovered from debris. Not possible with collapses or controlled demolitions. The press was vaporized or melted totally.

9. Bone dust cloud around the WTC. This was found not until spring 2006 from the Deutsche Bank building. (In excess of 700 human remains found on the roof and from air vents). See [link to www.911citizenswatch.org]

10. Fires took 100 days to extinguish despite continuous spraying of water. Thermate would burn out totally and then cool down much faster, just in a few days. This long cooling time means the total heath load being absorbed into the steels of the WTC was massive, far in excess anything found in collapses or typical controlled demolitions.

11. Brown shades of color in the air due nuclear radiation forming NO2, NO3 and nitric acid. TV and documentary footage changed the color balance to blue to disguise this fact indicating complicity in the coverup.

12. Elevated Tritium values measured in the WTC area but not elsewhere in New York. Official studies stated that 8 EXIT signs from two commercial Boeing jets were responsible. The tritium in those EXIT signs is insufficient to explain the measurements (very little tritium is available for measuring after evaporation into air as hydrogen and as tritiated water vapour. This can provide conclusive proof of fusion devices and therefore US/Israeli military involvement.

13. Pyroclastic flow observed in the concrete-based clouds. Only found with volcanic eruptions and nuclear detonations. The explosion squibs cool down just a few milliseconds after the explosion or after having reached some 10 meters in the air. Pyroclastic flow will not mix with other clouds meaning very serious heath in those clouds not possible with the conventional demolition or explosive charges. The pyroclastic clouds were cooling down at the WTC but this process took some 30 seconds. See [link to video.google.com]

14. Huge expanding dust clouds 5 times the volume of the building indicating extreme levels of heat generated far in excess of traditional demolition explosives.

15. Rubble height was some 10% of the original instead of 33% expected in a traditional demolition. Fusion device removal of underground central steel framework allowed upper framework to fall into this empty space and reduce the rubble height.

16. No survivors found, except some firefighters in one corner pocket in the rubble who looked up to see blue sky above them instead of being crushed by collapsing debris. Upward fusion flashlight-like beam of destruction missed this pocket but removed debris above those lucky firemen.

17. 14 rescue dogs and some rescue workers died far too soon afterward to be attributed to asbestos or dust toxins (respiratory problems due to alpha and tritium particles created by fusion are far more toxic)

18. Record concentrations of near-atomic size metal particles found in dust studies due to ablated steel. Only possible with vaporized (boiling) steels.

19. Decontamination procedure used at Ground Zero (hi-pressure water spraying) for all steel removed from site. Water spraying contains fusion radioactivity.

20. No bodies, furniture or computers found in the rubble, but intact sheets of paper covered the streets with fine dust. Items with significant mass absorbed fusion energy (neutrons, x-rays) and were vaporized while paper did not. Paper and powder theory.

21. 200 000 gallon sprinkler water tanks on the roofs of WTC1 and WTC2, but no water in the ruins. Heat of fusion devices vaporized large reservoirs of water.

22. Reports of cars exploding around the WTC and many burned out wrecks could be seen that had not been hit by debris. Fusion energy (heath radiation and the neutrons) caused cars to ignite and burn far from WTC site.

23. Wide area electrical outage, repairs took over 3 months. Fusion devices cause EM pulse with Compton scattering. See German engineers help the USA plate 5. [link to home.debitel.net]

24. EM pulse was recorded by broadcast cameras with high quality electronic circuitry. This occurred at the same time as the seismic peaks recorded by Lamont Doherty during the beginning of the collapse. This is due to the Compton Effect and resulted in a large area power outage at the WTC.

Source: [link to www.saunalahti.fi]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1013938
United Kingdom
06/26/2010 09:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
ttt for yank time
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1013938
United Kingdom
06/26/2010 11:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE ***** Quote

This is just a Russian covering up Russia's involvement in the 9/11 attacks
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1016739

I cover up Russian ‘involvement’ in the attacks? Ha-ha-ha. I pointed it out that the Soviet-made missile stolen from the Russians was used in the Pentagon attack (which you had no clue about before) and despite this you will say that I ‘cover-up’ Russian involvement? Which part of the alleged ‘Russian involvement’ I allegedly cover-up? Would you mind to be more precise?

You are right on the money sir. I had Dimitri figured out from jump street. I argued with him in this thread for many many posts and pointed out the truth for all to see but many are not listening. The dead givaway is the manner in which he absolves the US Government of any involvement which we know to be a LIE.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1016739

I by no means ‘absolve’ the US Government. I accuse the US Government of at least:
1) unnecessary demolishing the WTC-7 by a third 150 kiloton mini-nuke, which added at least 33% to total radiological consequences on ground zero (or ‘Ground Zero’ with Capital Letters if you wish).
2) not properly informing the public of radiological consequences around ground zero.
3) sending to clean ground zero gullible people without providing them proper training in handling nuclear hazards, without forcing them to wear adequate protective gear, and without adequately paying them for their dangerous work.
4) for ringing an atomic alert (caused by the missile that struck the Pentagon) for only Cheney and Rice and not for the entire Washington D.C.
5) for creating several commissions tasked with producing bogus evidence.
6) for cheating the people with this bogus evidence produced by these commissions.
7) for cheating people in regard to the alleged ‘planes’ made of aluminum that allegedly penetrated steel double-walled perimeters of the Twin Towers.
8) for shooting down of at least two passenger planes (flights 77 and 93);
9) for organizing persecution against innocent people in connection with 9/11 (war on alleged ‘terror’ and curtailment of civil rights inclusive).

I am certian that either of these 9 points is winnable in the court of law if the case is properly prepared and properly conducted.

By contrast, the FBI appointed shills/agent-provocateurs denounce/ignore any of these 9 winnable points of mine and propose, instead, suing the US Government on definitely losing points. Namely – they propose to accuse the US Government of pre-planned demolishing the Twin Towers with alleged ‘nano-thermite’/thermite/TNT/laser beams from space/so-called DEW/etc., accuse the US Government of staging both – the aerial attacks on the Twins and the Pentagon, and so also to accuse the US Government of premeditated mass murder. Which under no circumstances is possible to win in any court of law. Primarily because these FBI-appointed shills/agent-provocateurs would never be able to prove their points, while the US Government, in defense, will always be able to prove its complete innocence in regard to these ridiculous accusations.

Thus any reasonable person friendly with common sense and elementary logic and also at least partly acquainted with jurisprudence could see who is in reality a liar and who is not. Who is trying to defend the US Government (although by Jesuit methods – by pretending to accuse it using straw-man arguments) and who wants to accuse the US Government (at least for those counts of crime it really committed).

Anyone logical and fair is welcome to make his or her own conclusion and to judge who of us is a real government shill – me, or those ‘Anonymous Cowards’ whom I quote here.

In so doing he's also absolving the Russians in one stroke. This is his smoking gun.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1016739

See my explanation above when it comes to ‘absolving the Russians’. But when it comes to the ‘smoking gun’ I think the smokiest of all smoking guns is the one seen in the hands of those agent-provocateurs who propose to accuse the US Government for the alleged crimes it has never committed knowing it perfectly that such kind of charge would be in any case lost in the court of law.

I suspect that there might be a great deal of truth in what he's saying about it being nuclear but only because this lays the groundwork for the Americans to use this a sort of a reverse psychological tool - a reverse propaganda ploy. In other words the Americans are getting ready to make the admission, or some kind of a claim that YES there were nukes used to take the buildings down but it was Al Queda - not us and the combined intelligence agencies of the Russians, French, English and Israeli's. ……
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1016739

The above quote only means that the ‘Anonymous Coward’ who claimed this did not bother to watch my video presentation attentively enough. Because in it I successfully disproved the ‘mini-nukes’ theory and explained that it was HUGE 150 kiloton thermo-nuclear charges sized of a big barrel each that by no means could belong to any so-called ‘Al-Qaeda’, and not even to any ‘Russian/French/English/Israeli intelligent services’ but only to the US authorities. This consideration alone renders useless all previous bubbling of the abovementioned ‘Anonymous Coward’ about ‘reverse psychological tools’ and ‘reverse propaganda ploys’.

……You see, I am one who has always held that it was a nuclear event possibly coupled with some sort of exotic weaponry - particle beam, laser, Tesla type energy transmission, or otherwise.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1016739

That only means that the ‘Anonymous Coward’ quoted above has no clue about mechanics and has difficulties with common sense and elementary logic. Because for anyone friendly with common sense it is clear that a nuclear charge of 150 kiloton alone is more than enough to demolish the WTC and neither ‘Tesla-type stuff’, nor ‘particle-beam’, nor ‘laser’, nor so-called ‘nano-thermite’ is actually needed.

In short , Dimitri is, to a certain extent, speaking truthfully, and to a major extent he's a fucking liar of the highest order - and a traitor to the cause of truth.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1016739

Yes, of course. And those, who propose to sue the US Government for the intentional pre-planned demolition of the WTC by so-called ‘nano-thermite’ or by ‘laser-beams from space’ are, of course, ‘at service to the case of the truth’. Thinking peoples should differ from zombied morons and from the FBI shills and they should have their own judgment regarding the question who of two of us is indeed a liar.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 587855
United States
06/28/2010 11:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
yawn
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1001840
United Kingdom
06/28/2010 01:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
September Clues good, lying russian ex-spy? Very Bad.

Its so easy for someone to produce a document in the course of a video and claim it is original.
The lying ruskie claims he is ex soviet nuclear artilleryman, he shows nice picture of someone in uniform and an ID card, having never seen original documents for either of these items and having nothing to compare them too, i do not accept them as anything like proof, for they are not.

Where did the funding come from to make the overly long diatribe video?, who is the interviewer?, he refuses to answer these questions.

Do we really think that an insider coming out of the cold would be allowed to make and release this video if it did not fulfil someones agenda.

The very fact that all his information has been couched in terms of knowledge from a nuclear expert, with insider military access from the USSR presenting what he KNOWS after 9YEARS have passed is total crap.
Why didnt he do this five six or seven years ago if he has known about this since the early 1980's?.

I'll tell you why, his story has been formulated as another line of defence, it is a well crafted response to a need to be able to fulfil certain aspects of the 9/11 story as holes have begun to appear in the official story, and whoever the fucking idiot is who has been stating that, "your story is letting the russians off the hook for the attack" should take his own head off and kick it around because hes so fucking easily led he doesn't need it on his shoulders to navigate life. TWAT fucking TWAT.

That is perfect as far as those elements within the american government who are involved are concerned and no doubt are cock a hoop over how fortunate they are that some people are not only thinking like this but are willing to attempt to persuade others of the veracity of their "new findings".

Ask yourself this why would the American elite need pavel chekov to supply any weaponry whatsoever?.
They had their cover story and psy-op so well prepared we are still wondering exactly what the fuck did happen on that day nearly ten years on.

He states in the video that he saw in an american newspaper that someone who worked in the world trade center had discovered they had been redundantly wired with a small nuclear charge, they had noticed it on the blueprint and that it had created much consternation at the time, and this backed up what he already knew.
since seeing that video and hearing that i believed that finding that article would cement in my mind the truth of his words and i have looked for it extensively, i have also asked him to provide the source of the article he remembers.
I cant find it anywhere, and he cant tell me what paper it was in, is this because during the depths of the cold war the chances of a russian holding the ability to compromise the nuclear arsenal would have been kept far away from "western propaganda mouth-pieces", for sure he would not have been caught dead with something like that if he was in that position because it would have cost him his job.
If an intel officer whose job it was to read papers had it then when and where would he have seen it, this is something he would remember as seeing an american newspaper would have been something in his professional life he would never have come across. remember this is proper cold war russia, you couldn't buy a pair of levis and certainly not the fucking new york times.
think about this it does not add up, his story is another line of subterfuge aimed at keeping us in the dark and to splinter the movement further, lying russian bastard.
yoda
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48689817
Germany
11/18/2013 10:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New 9/11 Video - September Clues...pretty amazing !
bump

News